INTERPLAY OF LEAN THINKING AND SOCIAL DYNAMICS IN CONSTRUCTION

Production, commercial, technical, organizational and social aspects must be managed simultaneously for a construction project to be successfully delivered. However, most management approaches in construction are technically-oriented methodologies that largely neglect central social aspects related to people’s behaviour. Lean construction research has likewise focused more on technical and commercial aspects than on social aspects. Recent research in the domain has aroused interest in various social aspects, such as the language-action-perspective, people development, culture and transformation, and integral theory. Yet little research has been pursued to understand the interactions between lean construction thinking and the social dynamics within construction project organizations. To begin to bridge this gap, the latent synergy and feedback loops between lean construction practices and social dynamics variables such as trust, goal setting and power distance in construction are discussed in this paper. The interplay between lean construction tools and the social dynamics variables is illustrated through an example based on the Last Planner System (LPS). We argue that lean tools work better when the environment is less autocratic, the team is more integrated, and the levels of trust between project team members are higher. In this organizational environment power-distance is decreased. Lean and goal setting also seem to interact positively and motivate the team.

[1]  Luis F. Alarcón,et al.  Characterization of Lean Project Delivery , 2013 .

[2]  Gregory A. Howell New Operating System for Project Management: Consequences and Opportunities , 2011 .

[3]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. , 1990 .

[4]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[5]  Rafael Sacks,et al.  Effects of the Last Planner System on Social Networks among Construction Trade Crews , 2015 .

[6]  Luis F. Alarcón,et al.  Assessing the Impacts of Implementing Lean Construction , 2008 .

[7]  Luis F. Alarcón,et al.  Lean Construction Professional's Profile (LCPP): Understanding the Competences of a Lean Construction Professional , 2007 .

[8]  Zofia K. Rybkowski,et al.  Literature Review on Trust and Current Construction Industry Trends , 2012 .

[9]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An integrative model of organizational trust, Academy of Management Review, : . , 1995 .

[10]  Cornelius J. König,et al.  Integrating Theories of Motivation , 2006 .

[11]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction , 2000 .

[12]  Herman Glenn Ballard,et al.  THE LAST PLANNER SYSTEM OF PRODUCTION CONTROL , 2000 .

[13]  Luis F. Alarcón,et al.  Selection of Third Party Relationships in Construction , 2014 .

[14]  T. Malone Is Empowerment Just a Fad? Control, Decision Making, and IT , 1997 .

[15]  Binshan Lin,et al.  Project delivery system selection of construction projects in China , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[16]  William A. Lichtig,et al.  The Integrated Agreement for Lean Project Delivery , 2010 .

[17]  Luis F. Alarcón,et al.  Improving the Effectiveness of New Construction Management Philosophies using the Integral Theory , 2010 .

[18]  Sai On Cheung,et al.  Are Construction Disputes Inevitable? , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[19]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  The Toyota way : 14 management principles from the world's greatest manufacturer , 2004 .

[20]  Luis F. Alarcón,et al.  Uncertainty Management in Repetitive Projects using WIP Buffers , 2010 .

[21]  Hal Macomber,et al.  Linguistic Action: Contributing to the Theory of Lean Construction , 2003 .