Product diversification through licensing: Empirical evidence from Chinese firms

Anecdotal evidence suggests that manufacturing firms are able to engage in product diversification through external technology acquisitions, such as technology licensing. However, there is little empirical evidence regarding this proposition to link inward technology licensing and firms’ product diversification or to suggest when and under what conditions the effect of diversification through this channel may be mitigated or augmented. The current study aims to address this research gap through an empirical investigation of a sample of 141 Chinese manufacturing licensee firms. The results indicate that inward technology licensing is positively related to a firm’s diversification and that this relationship is further moderated by a licensee firm’s R&D expenditure and technological distance relative to the licensor firm.

[1]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[2]  T. Khanna,et al.  Is Group Affiliation Profitable in Emerging Markets? An Analysis of Diversified Indian Business Groups , 2000 .

[3]  F. Damanpour.  Organizational Size and Innovation , 1992 .

[4]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[5]  J. Killing,et al.  Diversification through licensing , 1978 .

[6]  A. Arora,et al.  Ideas for rent: an overview of markets for technology , 2010 .

[7]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  International Diversification: Effects on Innovation and Firm Performance in Product-Diversified Firms , 1997 .

[8]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Scale, Scope and Spillovers: The Determinants of Research Productivity in Ethical Drug Discovery , 2015 .

[9]  Salvatore Torrisi,et al.  Technological exploration through licensing: new insights from the licensee’s point of view , 2010 .

[10]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Technological Competencies in the World's Largest Firms: Characteristics, Constraints and Scope for Managerial Choice , 1995 .

[11]  N. Capon,et al.  Marketing and Technology: A Strategic Coalignment , 1987 .

[12]  Gary R. Carini,et al.  The Impact of Internationalization on the Diversification-Performance Relationship: A Replication and Extension of Prior Research , 2000 .

[13]  Martin Natter,et al.  Strategic diversification and capacity utilization , 2001 .

[14]  Wim Vanhaverbeke,et al.  External technology sourcing: The effect of uncertainty on governance mode choice , 2007 .

[15]  Kwaku Atuahene-Gima,et al.  Inward Technology Licensing as an Alternative to Internal R&D in New Product Development: A Conceptual Framework , 1992 .

[16]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  Open Innovation in Practice: An Analysis of Strategic Approaches to Technology Transactions , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[17]  Fabrizio Cesaroni,et al.  Technological outsourcing and product diversification: do markets for technology affect firms’ strategies? , 2004 .

[18]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Finding the organizational sources of technological breakthroughs: the story of Hewlett‐Packard's thermal ink‐jet , 2002 .

[19]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap. , 1994 .

[20]  Antonio Focacci,et al.  A techno-economic analysis of the results of product diversification in household appliance durables—evaluating concreteness , 2003 .

[21]  Keun Lee,et al.  Technological Regimes, Catching-Up and Leapfrogging: Findings from the Korean Industries , 2001 .

[22]  S. Purkayastha,et al.  Diversification and Performance in Developed and Emerging Market Contexts: A Review of the Literature , 2012 .

[23]  Young Jun Kim,et al.  Technology licensing partners , 2006 .

[24]  Andrea Fosfuri.  The Licensing Dilemma: Understanding the Determinants of the Rate of Technology Licensing , 2006 .

[25]  Young Jun Kim,et al.  Choosing between international technology licensing partners: An empirical analysis of U.S. biotechnology firms , 2009 .

[26]  I. Mathur,et al.  Performance impact of business group affiliation: An analysis of the diversification-performance link in a developing economy , 2007 .

[27]  A. Arora.  Contracting for tacit knowledge: the provision of technical services in technology licensing contracts , 1996 .

[28]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets , 2001 .

[29]  Yuandi Wang,et al.  The dual role of local sites in assisting firms with developing technological capabilities: Evidence from China , 2013 .

[30]  A. Arora,et al.  Licensing the market for technology , 2003 .

[31]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  Curvilinearity in the diversification–performance linkage: an examination of over three decades of research , 2000 .

[32]  Julian Lowe,et al.  R&D and technology purchase through licence agreements: complementary strategies and complementary assets , 1998 .

[33]  David A. Belsley.  On the efficient computation of the nonlinear full-information maximum-likelihood estimator , 1980 .

[34]  R. Bettis.  Performance differences in related and unrelated diversified firms , 1981 .

[35]  Paul G. Patterson,et al.  Managerial perceptions of technology licensing as an alternative to internal R&D in new product development: an empirical investigation , 1993 .

[36]  P. Williamson,et al.  Related diversification, core competences and corporate performance , 2007 .

[37]  Homi Katrak,et al.  Imports of technology and the technological effort of Indian enterprises , 1990 .

[38]  Kwaku Atuahene-Gima,et al.  Buying technology for product development in smaller firms , 1993 .

[39]  P. McCullagh.  Quasi-Likelihood Functions , 1983 .

[40]  Atul Nerkar,et al.  Old Is Gold? The Value of Temporal Exploration in the Creation of New Knowledge , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[41]  R. Caves,et al.  THE IMPERFECT MARKET FOR TECHNOLOGY LICENSES , 2009 .

[42]  Protiti Dastidar,et al.  International corporate diversification and performance: Does firm self-selection matter? , 2009 .

[43]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[44]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[45]  Mauro F. Guillén,et al.  Strategy and Structure in Developing Countries: Business Groups as an Evolutionary Response to Opportunities for Unrelated Diversification , 2001 .

[46]  A. Jaffe.  Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[47]  E. Huizingh.  Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives , 2011 .

[48]  Douglas J. Miller.  Technological diversity, related diversification, and firm performance , 2006 .

[49]  Royston Greenwood,et al.  The effect of within-industry diversification on firm performance: synergy creation, multi-market contact and market structuration , 2004 .

[50]  Daniel K. N. Johnson.  "Learning-by-Licensing": R&D and Technology Licensing in Brazilian Invention , 2002 .

[51]  Erik Jan Hultink,et al.  External technology acquisition and product innovativeness: The moderating roles of R&D investment and configurational context , 2011 .

[52]  A. Arora.  Licensing Tacit Knowledge: Intellectual Property Rights And The Market For Know-How , 1995 .

[53]  Xibao Li,et al.  In-house R&D, technology purchase and innovation: empirical evidences from Chinese hi-tech industries, 1995-2004 , 2010, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[54]  Yongtae Park,et al.  How should firms carry out technological diversification to improve their performance? An analysis of patenting of Korean firms , 2009 .

[55]  Peter T. Gianiodis,et al.  Innovation speed: Transferring university technology to market , 2005 .

[56]  Kiminori Gemba,et al.  Diversification dynamics of the Japanese industry , 2001 .

[57]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Knowledge acquisition from foreign parents in international joint ventures: an empirical examination in the Hungarian context , 1996 .

[58]  J. West,et al.  Open innovation : researching a new paradigm , 2008 .

[59]  R. Rumelt,et al.  Diversification strategy and profitability , 1982 .

[60]  B. Hako.  Strategies for diversification , 1972 .

[61]  Xiaolin Li,et al.  Impact of industry competition on contract manufacturing: An empirical study of U.S. manufacturers , 2012 .

[62]  Belen Villalonga,et al.  Diversification Discount or Premium? New Evidence from the Business Information Tracking Series , 2004 .

[63]  G. Hamel.  Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances , 1991 .

[64]  U. Lichtenthaler,et al.  A Capability-Based Framework for Open Innovation: Complementing Absorptive Capacity , 2009 .

[65]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[66]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .

[67]  A. Arora,et al.  COMPLEMENTARITY AND EXTERNAL LINKAGES: THE STRATEGIES OF THE LARGE FIRMS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY* , 1990 .

[68]  Chen-Kuo Lee,et al.  Relationships among industry environment, diversification motivations and corporate performance , 2008 .

[69]  R. Katila,et al.  SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF SEARCH BEHAVIOR AND NEW PRODUCT INTRODUCTION , 2002 .

[70]  Anil K. Gupta.  Impact of technological intensity on related and unrelated diversification , 1990 .

[71]  Bart van Looy,et al.  Technological Diversification, Coherence and Performance of Firms , 2007 .

[72]  Toke Reichstein,et al.  Licensing-in fosters rapid invention! the effect of the grant-back clause and technological unfamiliarity , 2012 .

[73]  Cynthia A. Montgomery,et al.  Corporate economic performance: Diversification strategy versus market structure , 1981 .

[74]  G. Ioannou,et al.  Absorptive capacity, innovation, and financial performance , 2011 .

[75]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[76]  Leslie E. Papke,et al.  Panel data methods for fractional response variables with an application to test pass rates , 2008 .

[77]  R. W. Wedderburn.  Quasi-likelihood functions, generalized linear models, and the Gauss-Newton method , 1974 .

[78]  F. Malerba,et al.  Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification , 2003 .

[79]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[80]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[81]  R. Rumelt.  Strategy, structure, and economic performance , 1974 .

[82]  Aubrey Silberston,et al.  Diversification and Integration in American Industry. , 1962 .

[83]  Jean-Paul Chavas,et al.  Economies of diversification: A generalization and decomposition of economies of scope , 2010 .

[84]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[85]  Rejie George,et al.  Heterogeneity in Business Groups and the Corporate Diversification - Firm Performance Relationship , 2012 .

[86]  F. Kodama,et al.  Technological Diversification of Japanese Industry , 1986, Science.

[87]  P. Almeida,et al.  Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: the influence of the MNC and host country on innovation , 2004 .

[88]  A. Pehrsson.  Business relatedness and performance : a study of managerial perceptions , 2006 .