An Overlooked Consequence of Dietary Mixing: A Varied Diet Reduces Interindividual Variance in Fitness

The determinants of diet breadth are of interest to nutritionists, ecologists, and evolutionary biologists. A recent synthesis addressing this issue found conflicting evidence for the relationship between diet breadth and mean individual fitness. Specifically, it found that while, on average, a mixed diet does increase mean fitness, in some instances, a single food provides equal (or higher) fitness than a mixed diet. Critical to ecological and evolutionary considerations of diet, however, is not only mean fitness but also variance in fitness. We combine contemporary meta-analytic methods with models of nutritional geometry to evaluate how diet affects between-individual variance in fitness within generalist consumers from a range of trophic levels. As predicted by nutritional geometry, we found that between-individual variance in fitness-related traits is higher on single-food than mixed diets. The effect was strong for longevity traits (57% higher) and reproductive traits (37%) and present but weaker for size-related traits (10%). Further, the effect became stronger as the number of available foods increased. The availability of multiple foods likely allows individuals with differing nutritional optima to customize intake, each maximizing their own fitness. Importantly, these findings may suggest that selection on traits correlated with nutritional requirements is weak in heterogeneous nutritional environments.

[1]  Niels J Dingemanse,et al.  Energetics and behavior: unrequited needs and new directions. , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[2]  S. Simpson,et al.  Macronutrient balance, reproductive function, and lifespan in aging mice , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Jérôme Buhl,et al.  Evolving Nutritional Strategies in the Presence of Competition: A Geometric Agent-Based Model , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[4]  Kerrie Mengersen,et al.  Meta‐analysis of variation: ecological and evolutionary applications and beyond , 2015 .

[5]  Michael A Charleston,et al.  Nutritional ecology beyond the individual: a conceptual framework for integrating nutrition and social interactions , 2015, Ecology letters.

[6]  Mathieu Lihoreau,et al.  Recent advances in the integrative nutrition of arthropods. , 2015, Annual review of entomology.

[7]  Michael A Charleston,et al.  Modelling nutrition across organizational levels: from individuals to superorganisms. , 2014, Journal of insect physiology.

[8]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Additive genetic variance and developmental plasticity in growth trajectories in a wild cooperative mammal , 2014, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[9]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  HETEROGENEITY IN INDIVIDUAL QUALITY AND REPRODUCTIVE TRADE‐OFFS WITHIN SPECIES , 2014, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[10]  C. Lortie,et al.  Publication and Related Biases , 2013 .

[11]  M. Rosenberg,et al.  Phylogenetic Nonindependence and Meta-analysis , 2013 .

[12]  K. Kannan,et al.  Functional implications of Drosophila insulin-like peptides in metabolism, aging, and dietary restriction , 2013, Front. Physiol..

[13]  D. Raubenheimer,et al.  30 Days in the Life: Daily Nutrient Balancing in a Wild Chacma Baboon , 2013, PloS one.

[14]  Andrew M. Rodewald,et al.  Evaluation of the reliability and validity of GraphClick as a data extraction program , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  J. Duffy,et al.  Physiological effects of diet mixing on consumer fitness: a meta-analysis. , 2013, Ecology.

[16]  Kerrie Mengersen,et al.  Handbook of Meta-analysis in Ecology and Evolution , 2013 .

[17]  David Raubenheimer,et al.  The Nature of Nutrition: A Unifying Framework from Animal Adaptation to Human Obesity , 2012 .

[18]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  Meta-analytic insights into evolutionary ecology: an introduction and synthesis , 2012, Evolutionary Ecology.

[19]  David Raubenheimer,et al.  Match and mismatch: conservation physiology, nutritional ecology and the timescales of biological adaptation , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  David Raubenheimer,et al.  Optimal foraging for specific nutrients in predatory beetles , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  Cyrille Violle,et al.  The return of the variance: intraspecific variability in community ecology. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[22]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  Methodological issues and advances in biological meta-analysis , 2012, Evolutionary Ecology.

[23]  L. Cook,et al.  The generalism-specialism debate: the role of generalists in the life and death of species , 2011 .

[24]  Andrew D Higginson,et al.  Optimal foraging for multiple nutrients in an unpredictable environment. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[25]  I. Jamieson,et al.  Multimodel inference in ecology and evolution: challenges and solutions , 2011, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[26]  Wolfgang Viechtbauer,et al.  Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package , 2010 .

[27]  J. Hadfield,et al.  General quantitative genetic methods for comparative biology: phylogenies, taxonomies and multi‐trait models for continuous and categorical characters , 2010, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[28]  H. Schielzeth Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients , 2010 .

[29]  Jarrod D. Hadfield,et al.  MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models , 2010 .

[30]  L. Hedges,et al.  The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis , 2009 .

[31]  H. A. Orr,et al.  Fitness and its role in evolutionary genetics , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[32]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[33]  Audrey Dussutour,et al.  Communal Nutrition in Ants , 2009, Current Biology.

[34]  David Raubenheimer,et al.  Sex-Specific Fitness Effects of Nutrient Intake on Reproduction and Lifespan , 2008, Current Biology.

[35]  David Raubenheimer,et al.  Lifespan and reproduction in Drosophila: New insights from nutritional geometry , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  S. Simpson,et al.  Nutrient-specific compensation following diapause in a predator: implications for intraguild predation. , 2007, Ecology.

[37]  S. Simpson,et al.  Evolving resistance to obesity in an insect , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  R. Sibly,et al.  Optimal foraging when regulating intake of multiple nutrients , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[39]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit , 2002 .

[40]  S. Thompson,et al.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[41]  R. Kassen The experimental evolution of specialists, generalists, and the maintenance of diversity , 2002 .

[42]  W. Link,et al.  Individual Covariation in Life‐History Traits: Seeing the Trees Despite the Forest , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[43]  W. R. Demott UTILIZATION OF A CYANOBACTERIUM AND A PHOSPHORUS-DEFICIENT GREEN ALGA AS COMPLEMENTARY RESOURCES BY DAPHNIDS , 1998 .

[44]  P. Rogers,et al.  Food choice and intake: towards a unifying framework of learning and feeding motivation , 1998, Nutrition Research Reviews.

[45]  G. Smith,et al.  Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test , 1997, BMJ.

[46]  R. Greenspan,et al.  Natural behavior polymorphism due to a cGMP-dependent protein kinase of Drosophila. , 1997, Science.

[47]  S. Simpson,et al.  The geometry of compensatory feeding in the locust , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[48]  A. Honěk,et al.  Intraspecific variation in body size and fecundity in insects: a general relationship , 1993 .

[49]  L. V. Valen,et al.  MORPHOLOGICAL VARIATION AND WIDTH OF ECOLOGICAL NICHE , 1965 .

[50]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[51]  Marc J Lajeunessei On the meta-analysis of response ratios for studies with correlated and multi-group designs. , 2011, Ecology.

[52]  B. Hallgrímsson,et al.  Variation and Variability: Central Concepts in Biology , 2005 .

[53]  Bias in meta›analysis detected by a simple, graphical test , 1998 .

[54]  Ingram Olkin,et al.  Stochastically dependent effect sizes. , 1994 .