The effect of packet loss in the homogeneous and heterogeneous protocols media exchange environment: A comparison

In the last few years, when two Internet users want to communicate via chatting application, they have to use the same application since each chatting application uses a certain signaling protocol to handle the chatting sessions. As a result, many researchers proposed some mapping architectures when two users want to communicate using different chatting applications by proposing a translation gateway in order to translate the message format of the sender to the receiver message format. This paper presents a comparison with respect to the packet loss for the homogeneous and heterogeneous protocols media exchange environments including the two main media session architectures.

[1]  R. Sureswaran,et al.  A control criteria to optimize collaborative document and multimedia conferencing bandwidth requirements , 1995, Proceedings of IEEE Singapore International Conference on Networks and International Conference on Information Engineering '95.

[2]  Rosilah Hassan,et al.  Next Generation IP Address Transition Mechanism for Web Application System , 2011 .

[3]  Putra Sumari,et al.  An Effective Method for Audio Translation between IAX and RSW Protocols , 2011 .

[4]  T. Dagiuklas,et al.  A lightweight and scalable VoIP platform based on MGCP/H.323 interworking and QoS management capabilities , 2005 .

[5]  Gee Rittenhouse,et al.  Providing VOIP service in UMTS-HSDPA with frame aggregation , 2005, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005..

[6]  Mohamed Boucadair.  Inter-Asterisk Exchange (IAX) , 2009 .

[7]  I. Lambadaris,et al.  A comparative study of the SIP and IAX VoIP protocols , 2005, Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2005..

[8]  E. Merzari,et al.  Large-Scale Simulations on Thermal-Hydraulics in Fuel Bundles of Advanced Nuclear Reactors , 2007 .

[9]  Mosleh M. Abu-Alhaj,et al.  Comparative Evaluation and Analysis of IAX and RSW , 2010, ArXiv.

[10]  Ivan Livaja,et al.  EXTENSIBLE MESSAGING AND PRESENCE PROTOCOL (XMPP) , 2018 .

[11]  Wolfgang Kellerer,et al.  Service architectures in H.323 and SIP: A comparison , 2003, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[12]  Behrouz A. Forouzan,et al.  Data Communications and Networking , 2000 .

[13]  R. Sureswaran,et al.  Multimedia Communication: RSW Control Protocol and IAX , 2008, 2008 International Symposium on High Capacity Optical Networks and Enabling Technologies.

[14]  Manjur Kolhar.  Real Time Conference Gateway for Heterogeneous Clients , 2011 .

[15]  Peter Saint-Andre,et al.  Interworking between the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP): Instant Messaging , 2015, RFC.

[16]  Nancy Garg.  Network Simulators: A Case Study , 2015 .

[17]  Nobuhiko Kitawaki,et al.  Perceptual QoS assessment technologies for VoIP , 2004, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[18]  R. Sureswaran,et al.  A fully distributed architecture to support multimedia conferencing , 1999, 1999 Internet Workshop. IWS99. (Cat. No.99EX385).

[19]  Yi-Hung Huang,et al.  A novel design of instant messaging service extended from short message service with XMPP , 2004 .

[20]  Mohamed Boucadair.  Inter-Asterisk Exchange (Iax): Deployment Scenarios in Sip-Enabled Networks , 2009 .

[21]  B. Goode,et al.  Voice over Internet protocol (VoIP) , 2002, Proc. IEEE.

[22]  Henning Schulzrinne,et al.  Reliable, scalable and interoperable internet telephony , 2006 .