Physiological Demands of a Self-Paced Firefighter Air-Management Course and Determination of Work Efficiency

Firefighters often complete air management courses (AMC) to assess the ability to tolerate personal protective equipment, appropriately manage the breathing system and assess occupational performance. Little information is known relative to the physiological demands of AMCs, nor how to assess work efficiency in order to characterize occupational performance and evaluate progress. Purpose: To assess the physiological demands of an AMC and examine differences across BMI categories. A secondary aim was to develop an equation to assess work efficiency in firefighters. Methods: Fifty-seven firefighters (Women, n = 4; age: 37.2 ± 8.4 yr.; height: 182.0 ± 6.9 cm; body mass: 90.8 ± 13.1 kg; BMI: 27.8 ± 3.6 kg·m−2) completed an AMC per routine evaluation while wearing a department issued self-contained breathing apparatus and full protective gear. Course completion time, starting pounds per square inch (PSI) on the air cylinder, changes in PSI, and distance traveled were recorded. All firefighters were equipped with a wearable sensor integrated with a triaxial accelerometer and telemetry to assess movement kinematics, heart rate, energy expenditure, and training impulse. The AMC consisted of an initial section involving a hose line advance, rescue (body drag), stair climb, ladder raise, and forcible entry. This section was followed by a repeating loop, which consisted of a stair climb, search, hoist, and recovery walk. Firefighters repeated the course loop until the self-contained breathing apparatus air supply pressure reached 200 PSI, at which time they were instructed to lay down until the PSI reached zero. Results: Average completion time was 22.8 ± 1.4 min, with a mean distance of 1.4 ± 0.3 km and an average velocity of 2.4 ± 1.2 m·s−1. Throughout the AMC, the mean heart rate was 158.7 ± 11.5 bpm equating to 86.8 ± 6.3% of the age-predicted max heart rate and a training impulse of 55 ± 3 AU. Mean energy expenditure was 464 ± 86 kcals and work efficiency was 49.8 ± 14.9 km·PSI−1·s. Regression analysis determined that fat-free mass index (R2 = 0.315; β = −5.069), body fat percentage (R2 = 0.139; β = −0.853), fat-free mass (R2 = 0.176; β = −0.744), weight (R2 = 0.329; β = −0.681), and age (R2 = 0.096; β = −0.571) were significant predictors of work efficiency. Conclusions: The AMC is a highly aerobic task with near-maximal heart rates reached throughout the course. Smaller and leaner individuals achieved a higher degree of work efficiency during the AMC.

[1]  Richard M. Kesler,et al.  Fitness Fights Fires: Exploring the Relationship between Physical Fitness and Firefighter Ability , 2021, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

[2]  Mark G Abel,et al.  Predictors of Work Efficiency in Structural Firefighters. , 2021, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[3]  M. Abel,et al.  The Influence of Age on Firefighter Combat Challenge Performance and Exercise Training Habits. , 2020, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[4]  K. Sell,et al.  What do Firefighting Ability Tests Tell Us About Firefighter Physical Fitness? A Systematic Review of the Current Evidence. , 2020, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[5]  A. Stromberg,et al.  The Effect of Personal Protective Equipment on Firefighter Occupational Performance. , 2019, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[6]  Michael H. Stone,et al.  Standardization and Methodological Considerations for the Isometric Midthigh Pull , 2019, Strength & Conditioning Journal.

[7]  Joy C MacDermid,et al.  Comparison of Canadian firefighters and healthy controls based on submaximal fitness testing and strength considering age and gender , 2019, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[8]  A. Groslambert,et al.  Physiological responses and parasympathetic reactivation in rescue interventions: The effect of the breathing apparatus , 2018, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[9]  K. Ebersole,et al.  INTRA-RATER TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY AND RESPONSE STABILITY OF THE FUSIONETICS™ MOVEMENT EFFICIENCY TEST. , 2018, International journal of sports physical therapy.

[10]  F. Trudeau,et al.  Greater physical fitness is associated with better air ventilation efficiency in firefighters. , 2015, Applied ergonomics.

[11]  Denise L. Smith,et al.  Firefighter Health and Fitness Assessment: A Call to Action , 2014, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[12]  J. Oksa,et al.  Field Tests for Evaluating the Aerobic Work Capacity of Firefighters , 2013, PloS one.

[13]  M. Abel,et al.  The Effect of Fatigue and Training Status on Firefighter Performance , 2012, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[14]  C. Christophi,et al.  Firefighters' physical activity: relation to fitness and cardiovascular disease risk. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[15]  L. J. Henry,et al.  Assessment of Physical Fitness Aspects and Their Relationship to Firefighters' Job Abilities , 2011, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[16]  S. Kales,et al.  The Prevalence of Overweight, Obesity, and Substandard Fitness in a Population-Based Firefighter Cohort , 2011, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[17]  Richard L Hughson,et al.  Physiological responses and air consumption during simulated firefighting tasks in a subway system. , 2010, Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme.

[18]  Richard L Hughson,et al.  Air management and physiological responses during simulated firefighting tasks in a high-rise structure. , 2010, Applied ergonomics.

[19]  M. Michaelides,et al.  Predicting Performance on a Firefghter's Ability Test From Fitness Parameters , 2008, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[20]  David C Christiani,et al.  THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE , 1977, The Lancet.

[21]  M. Mittleman,et al.  Seasonality and Coronary Heart Disease Deaths in United States Firefighters , 2007, Chronobiology international.

[22]  J. Medbø,et al.  Physiological responses of firefighters and performance predictors during a simulated rescue of hospital patients , 2006, Ergonomics.

[23]  N. Eves,et al.  The influence of the self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) on ventilatory function and maximal exercise. , 2005, Canadian journal of applied physiology = Revue canadienne de physiologie appliquee.

[24]  Matthew R Rhea,et al.  PHYSICAL FITNESS AND JOB PERFORMANCE OF FIREFIGHTERS , 2004, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[25]  David C Christiani,et al.  Firefighters and on-duty deaths from coronary heart disease: a case control study , 2003, Environmental health : a global access science source.

[26]  H N Williford,et al.  Relationship between fire fighting suppression tasks and physical fitness. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[27]  J. Evans Straightforward Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 1995 .

[28]  J. Hodgson,et al.  Variables predictive of performance in elite middle-distance runners. , 1985, British journal of sports medicine.

[29]  George K. Beckham,et al.  Effect of Body Position on Force Production During the Isometric Midthigh Pull , 2018, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[30]  K. Ebersole,et al.  Tactical Athletes: An Integrated Approach to Understanding and Enhancing the Health and Performance of Firefighters-in-Training , 2015 .

[31]  C O Dotson,et al.  Relationship between simulated fire fighting tasks and physical performance measures. , 1982, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.