Comparing energy crops for biogas production Yields, energy input and costs in cultivation using digestate and mineral fertilisation

Analyses of six crops grown in southern Sweden for biogas production (hemp, sugar beet, maize, triticale, grass/clover ley, winter wheat) showed varying performance regarding methane yield per hectare and energy input and costs in the production and supply of crops as biogas feedstock. The highest biomass and biogas yield was observed for sugar beet. Crops with lower risk of negative environmental impact in cultivation, such as ley and hemp, produced less than half the methane energy yield per hectare. Triticale, also having less risk of negative environmental impact, gave an energy yield similar to that of winter wheat grain and maize. Replacing most of the mineral fertiliser with biogas digestate did not, with the exception for hemp, influence crop yields per hectare, but energy input in cultivation decreased by on average 34% for the six crops tested. For hemp and sugar beet the biogas feedstock costs for the freshly harvested crop per GJ methane were close to that of the economic reference crop, winter wheat grain. For maize, beet tops and first and second year ley, the feedstock costs were lower, and for triticale much lower. When ensiled crops were used for biogas the feedstock costs increased and only those of triticale silage remained slightly lower than the cost of dried wheat grain. However, all feedstock costs were so high that profitable biogas production based solely on ensiled crops would be difficult to achieve at present Swedish biogas sales prices. (c) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  J. Englund,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of industrial hemp - effect of harvest time on methane energy yield per hectare. , 2011 .

[2]  Volkhard Scholz,et al.  Sustainability of Energy Crop Cultivation in Central Europe , 2010 .

[3]  D. R. Tottman The decimal code for the growth stages of cereals, with illustrations , 1987 .

[4]  Thomas Prade,et al.  Energy balances for biogas and solid biofuel production from industrial hemp , 2012 .

[5]  T Wiesenthal,et al.  How much bioenergy can Europe produce without harming the environment , 2006 .

[6]  J. Zadoks A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals , 1974 .

[7]  Monika Heiermann,et al.  Biogas Crops – Part II: Balance of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy from Using Field Crops for Anaerobic Digestion , 2009 .

[8]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater seventh edition , 2013 .

[9]  G. Ghekiere,et al.  Biological ensilage additives as pretreatment for maize to increase the biogas production. , 2010 .

[10]  Amtlicher Teil,et al.  Bundesministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz , 2007, Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz.

[11]  M. B. Green Energy in pesticide manufacture, distribution and use , 1987 .

[12]  Josef Boxberger,et al.  Biogas production from grassland biomass in the Alpine region. , 2005 .

[13]  Thomas Prade,et al.  Biomass and energy yield of industrial hemp grown for biogas and solid fuel , 2011 .

[14]  Mikael Lantz,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Biofuels in Sweden , 2010 .

[15]  Mikael Lantz,et al.  Biogas från gödsel och vall - analys av föreslagna styrmedel , 2011 .

[16]  Ivo Achu Nges,et al.  Benefits of supplementing an industrial waste anaerobic digester with energy crops for increased biogas production. , 2012, Waste management.

[17]  E. Robert,et al.  Indirect Land Use Change From Increased Biofuels Demand - Comparison of Models and Results for Marginal Biofuels Production from Different Feedstocks , 2010 .

[18]  D. Weichgrebe,et al.  The valuation of malnutrition in the mono-digestion of maize silage by anaerobic batch tests. , 2008, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[19]  E. Lichtfouse Sociology, Organic Farming, Climate Change and Soil Science , 2010 .

[20]  Jacinto F. Fabiosa,et al.  Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change , 2008, Science.

[21]  Siegfried Schittenhelm,et al.  Chemical composition and methane yield of maize hybrids with contrasting maturity. , 2008 .

[22]  Bo Stenberg,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of alfalfa silage with recirculation of process liquid. , 2007, Bioresource technology.

[23]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Effects of ensiling, silage additives and storage period on methane formation of biogas crops. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[24]  Pål Börjesson,et al.  Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems—Part II: The environmental impact of replacing various reference systems , 2007 .

[25]  W. Zollitsch,et al.  Biogas production from maize and dairy cattle manure - influence of biomass composition on the methane yield. , 2007 .

[26]  Pål Börjesson,et al.  Agricultural crop-based biofuels – resource efficiency and environmental performance including direct land use changes , 2011 .

[27]  T. Bennett Environment and Agriculture , 2010 .

[28]  F. Weissbach,et al.  Correcting the dry matter content of sugar beet silages as a substrate for biogas production. , 2008 .

[29]  Emma Kreuger,et al.  Ensiling of crops for biogas production: effects on methane yield and total solids determination , 2011, Biotechnology for biofuels.

[30]  Barbara Amon,et al.  Methane production through anaerobic digestion of various energy crops grown in sustainable crop rotations. , 2007, Bioresource technology.

[31]  G. Kiely,et al.  How can we improve biomethane production per unit of feedstock in biogas plants , 2011 .

[32]  A. Lehtomäki,et al.  Two-Stage Anaerobic Digestion of Energy Crops: Methane Production, Nitrogen Mineralisation and Heavy Metal Mobilisation , 2006, Environmental technology.