Detailed assessment of global transport-energy models’ structures and projections

This paper focuses on comparing the frameworks and projections from four global transportation models with considerable technology details. We analyze and compare the modeling frameworks, underlying data, assumptions, intermediate parameters, and projections to identify the sources of divergence or consistency, as well as key knowledge gaps. We find that there are significant differences in the base-year data and key parameters for future projections, especially for developing countries. These include passenger and freight activity, mode shares, vehicle ownership rates, and energy consumption by mode, particularly for shipping, aviation and trucking. This may be due in part to a lack of previous efforts to do such consistency-checking and “bench-marking.” We find that the four models differ in terms of the relative roles of various mitigation strategies to achieve a 2 °C/450 ppm target: the economics-based integrated assessment models favor the use of low carbon fuels as the primary mitigation option followed by efficiency improvements, whereas transport-only and expert-based models favor efficiency improvements of vehicles followed by mode shifts. We offer recommendations for future modeling improvements focusing on (1) reducing data gaps; (2) translating the findings from this study into relevant policy implications such as gaps of current policy goals, additional policy targets needed, regional vs. global reductions; (3) modeling strata of demographic groups to improve understanding of vehicle ownership levels, travel behavior, and urban vs. rural considerations; and (4) conducting coordinated efforts in aligning historical data, and comparing input assumptions and results of policy analysis and modeling insights.

[1]  J D Miller,et al.  The state of clean transport policy: a 2014 synthesis of vehicle and fuel policy developments , 2014 .

[2]  M. Ha-Duong,et al.  Climate change 2014 - Mitigation of climate change , 2015 .

[3]  Marshall A. Wise,et al.  Balancing global water availability and use at basin scale in an integrated assessment model , 2016, Climatic Change.

[4]  Aie,et al.  Energy Technology Perspectives 2012 , 2006 .

[5]  Patrick Jochem,et al.  Real-world fuel economy and CO2 emissions of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles , 2015 .

[6]  Sonia Yeh,et al.  Transportation Module of Global Change Assessment Model (GCAM): Model Documentation , 2013 .

[7]  Sonia Yeh,et al.  Mitigating Climate Change: Decomposing the Relative Roles of Energy Conservation, Technological Change, and Structural Shift , 2013 .

[8]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Energy Pathways for Sustainable Development , 2012 .

[9]  J. Minx,et al.  Climate Change 2014 : Synthesis Report , 2014 .

[10]  Zhenhong Lin,et al.  Improving the behavioral realism of global integrated assessment models: An application to consumers’ vehicle choices , 2017 .

[11]  A. Schäfer,et al.  The future mobility of the world population , 2000 .

[12]  A. Bandivadekar,et al.  The WLTP: How a new test procedure for cars will affect fuel consumption values in the EU , 2014 .

[13]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Transport electrification: A key element for energy system transformation and climate stabilization , 2014, Climatic Change.

[14]  From land use to land cover : Restoring the afforestation signal in a coupled integrated 1 assessment-earth system model and the implications for CMIP 5 RCP simulations 2 3 , 2014 .

[15]  K. Calvin,et al.  Post-2020 climate agreements in the major economies assessed in the light of global models , 2015 .

[16]  Sonia Yeh,et al.  Incorporating Behavioral Effects from Vehicle Choice Models into Bottom-Up Energy Sector Models , 2015 .

[17]  Tom Kober,et al.  A CROSS-MODEL COMPARISON OF GLOBAL LONG-TERM TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION UNDER A 2°C CLIMATE CHANGE CONTROL TARGET , 2013 .

[18]  F. Creutzig,et al.  Energy and environment. Transport: A roadblock to climate change mitigation? , 2015, Science.

[19]  James R. McFarland,et al.  Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change? , 2015, Science.

[20]  Detlef P. van Vuuren,et al.  Climate impact of transportation A model comparison , 2013, Climatic Change.

[21]  Detlef P. van Vuuren,et al.  Decomposing passenger transport futures: Comparing results of global integrated assessment models , 2017 .

[22]  Fuqiang Zhang,et al.  Methodological issues in cross-country/region decomposition of energy and environment indicators , 2001 .

[23]  J. Edmonds,et al.  Modelling energy technologies in a competitive market , 1993 .

[24]  Xiliang Zhang,et al.  Modeling Regional Transportation Demand in China and the Impacts of a National Carbon Policy , 2014 .

[25]  Lew Fulton,et al.  IEA Mobility Model (MoMo) and its use in the ETP 2008 , 2009 .

[26]  A. Schäfer,et al.  Transportation in a Climate-Constrained World , 2009 .

[27]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy:: which is the preferred method? , 2004 .

[28]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Limited impact on decadal-scale climate change from increased use of natural gas , 2014, Nature.

[29]  Sha Fu,et al.  Long-Term Transport Energy Demand and Climate Policy: Alternative Visions on Transport Decarbonization in Energy Economy Models , 2013 .

[30]  Lee Schipper,et al.  Transport and Carbon Emissions in the United States: The Long View , 2011 .

[31]  Son H. Kim,et al.  Long-term implications of alternative light-duty vehicle technologies for global greenhouse gas emissions and primary energy demands , 2011 .

[32]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  From land use to land cover: restoring the afforestation signal in a coupled integrated assessment–earth system model and the implications for CMIP5 RCP simulations , 2014 .

[33]  Céline Guivarch,et al.  Transport infrastructure costs in low-carbon pathways , 2017 .