CEOs' reputation, quality management and environmental innovation: The roles of stakeholder pressure and resource commitment

In this paper, we examine how and when chief executive officers' (CEOs') reputation enhances environmental innovation by considering quality management as a mediating mechanism of this relationship. In addition, we introduce stakeholder pressures (primary and secondary stakeholder pressures) as important contingencies of the relationship between CEOs' reputation and quality management. Moreover, we test the moderating role of resource commitment on the quality management‐environmental innovation relationship. We test our research model using data from a manufacturing industry sample of 217 firms from Ghana. We find that quality management mediates the relationship between reputation and environmental innovation. Moreover, the relationship between CEOs' reputation and quality management is amplified when levels of both primary and secondary stakeholder pressures are greater. Finally, our findings show that the effect of quality management on environmental innovation is enhanced when resource commitment is greater. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

[1]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. , 1977 .

[2]  C. Fornell,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics , 1981 .

[3]  W. Powell,et al.  THE IRON CAGE REVISITED: , 1983, The New Economic Sociology.

[4]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit , 1984 .

[5]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[6]  Alan J. Dubinsky,et al.  A Model of Sales Supervisor Leadership Behavior and Retail Salespeople's Job-Related Outcomes: , 1986 .

[7]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Joseph A. Cote,et al.  Estimating Trait, Method, and Error Variance: Generalizing across 70 Construct Validation Studies , 1987 .

[9]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[10]  D. Slevin,et al.  A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior , 1991 .

[11]  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[12]  R. Grant The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation , 1991 .

[13]  Gaylen N. Chandler,et al.  The founder's self-assessed competence and venture performance , 1992 .

[14]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[15]  Joel Podolny Market Uncertainty and the Social Character of Economic Exchange , 1994 .

[16]  H. Rao The Social Construction of Reputation: Certification Contests, Legitimation, and the Survival of Organizations in the American Automobile Industry: 1895–1912 , 1994 .

[17]  S. Hart A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1995 .

[18]  A. Roth,et al.  Strategic Determinants of Service Quality and Performance: Evidence from the Banking Industry , 1995 .

[19]  L. Preston,et al.  The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications , 1995 .

[20]  Robert M. Morgan,et al.  The Resource-Advantage Theory of Competition: Dynamics, Path Dependencies, and Evolutionary Dimensions , 1996 .

[21]  C. Fombrun,et al.  The Reputational Landscape , 1997 .

[22]  M. Russo,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective On Corporate Environmental Performance And Profitability , 1997 .

[23]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[24]  R. Poulin SPECIES RICHNESS OF PARASITE ASSEMBLAGES: Evolution and Patterns , 1997 .

[25]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  A process view on managing quality during the creation of technical innovations: Lessons from field research , 1997 .

[26]  Petronella C. de Weerd-Nederhof,et al.  Assessing R & D quality in rehabilitation technology development. The case of Roessingh Research and Development , 1997 .

[27]  Petra Christmann Effects of “Best Practices” of Environmental Management on Cost Advantage: The Role of Complementary Assets , 2000 .

[28]  R. Landis,et al.  Moderated Multiple Regression Tests are Criterion Specific , 2000 .

[29]  K. Rennings Redefining innovation -- eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics , 2000 .

[30]  Stephen S. Standifird Reputation and e-commerce: eBay auctions and the asymmetrical impact of positive and negative ratings , 2001 .

[31]  Neil A. Morgan,et al.  Product quality alignment and business unit performance , 2001 .

[32]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[33]  Scott Shane,et al.  Network Ties, Reputation, and the Financing of New Ventures , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[34]  F. Bosch,et al.  Reputation Management Capabilities as Decision Rules , 2004 .

[35]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN OPERATIONAL PRACTICES AND PERFORMANCE AMONG EARLY ADOPTERS OF GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN CHINESE MANUFACTURING ENTERPRISES , 2004 .

[36]  E. A. Locke,et al.  The relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skill, and motivation to subsequent venture growth. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[37]  C. Fombrun,et al.  Business Ethics: Corporate Responses to Scandal , 2004 .

[38]  C. Reese,et al.  A Bayesian operationalization of the resource‐based view , 2004 .

[39]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing , 2004 .

[40]  Neil A. Morgan,et al.  Antecedents of Export Venture Performance: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Assessment , 2004 .

[41]  Antoaneta P. Petkova,et al.  Being good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation , 2005 .

[42]  P. Daugherty,et al.  The role of resource commitment and innovation in reverse logistics performance , 2005 .

[43]  A. Jaffe,et al.  A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy , 2005 .

[44]  John L. Campbell Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? an institutional theory of corporate social responsibility , 2007 .

[45]  A. Sohal,et al.  The impact of TQM practices on performance: a comparative study between Australian and Singaporean organizations , 2006 .

[46]  T. Laosirihongthong,et al.  The impact of total quality management on innovation , 2006 .

[47]  S. Thornhill Knowledge, innovation and firm performance in high- and low-technology regimes , 2006 .

[48]  G. M. Castro,et al.  Business and Social Reputation: Exploring the Concept and Main Dimensions of Corporate Reputation , 2006 .

[49]  Charles E. Eesley,et al.  Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action , 2006 .

[50]  R. Morgan,et al.  Factors facilitating and impeding the development of export market-oriented behavior: A study of Hong Kong manufacturing exporters , 2006 .

[51]  Patrícia Moura E Sá,et al.  The Role of TQM Practices in Technological Innovation: The Portuguese Footwear Industry Case , 2007 .

[52]  Moses Acquaah Managerial social capital, strategic orientation, and organizational performance in an emerging economy , 2007 .

[53]  J. D. Hess,et al.  Mean-Centering Does Not Alleviate Collinearity Problems in Moderated Multiple Regression Models , 2007 .

[54]  A. Stefan,et al.  Does It Pay to Be Green? A Systematic Overview , 2008 .

[55]  Nuria E. Hurtado-Torres,et al.  Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: a resource-based perspective. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[56]  S. Carter,et al.  The role of entrepreneurial capital in building service reputation , 2008 .

[57]  Antoaneta P. Petkova,et al.  How can New Ventures Build Reputation? An Exploratory Study , 2008 .

[58]  Monika I. Winn,et al.  Building Chains and Directing Flows , 2008 .

[59]  Sanja Pekovic,et al.  From quality to innovation: Evidence from two French Employer Surveys , 2009 .

[60]  Qing Cao,et al.  Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[61]  Paul C. Godfrey,et al.  The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesis , 2009 .

[62]  R. Baron,et al.  Entrepreneurs' Optimism And New Venture Performance: A Social Cognitive Perspective , 2009 .

[63]  I. Barreto Dynamic Capabilities: A Review of Past Research and an Agenda for the Future , 2010 .

[64]  Y. Debrah,et al.  The Protracted Collapse of Ghana Airways: Lessons in Organizational Failure , 2010 .

[65]  J. Harrison,et al.  Managing for Stakeholders, Stakeholder Utility Functions, and Competitive Advantage. , 2010 .

[66]  M. Lähdesmäki,et al.  Towards a Variety of Meanings – Multiple Representations of Reputation in the Small Business Context , 2010 .

[67]  Jeffrey A. Sonnenfeld,et al.  Value Congruence and Charismatic Leadership in CEO–Top Manager Relationships: An Empirical Investigation , 2011 .

[68]  Kevin Baird,et al.  The relationships between organizational culture, total quality management practices and operational performance , 2011 .

[69]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: strategy for the (n)ever-changing world , 2011 .

[70]  Juan José Tarí,et al.  Quality management, environmental management and firm performance: direct and mediating effects in the hotel industry , 2012 .

[71]  William Newburry Waving the Flag: The Influence of Country of Origin on Corporate Reputation , 2012 .

[72]  R. Abratt,et al.  Corporate identity, corporate branding and corporate reputations: Reconciliation and integration , 2012 .

[73]  Hao Tan,et al.  Determinants of quality management practices: An empirical study of New Zealand manufacturing firms , 2013 .

[74]  A. Strobl,et al.  Entrepreneurial reputation in destination networks , 2013 .

[75]  Pavel Castka,et al.  The effect of pressure from secondary stakeholders on the internalization of ISO 14001 , 2013 .

[76]  Richard K. Blundel,et al.  Evaluating Enterprise Policy Interventions in Africa: A Critical Review of Ghanaian Small Business Support Services , 2015 .

[77]  S. Schmidt,et al.  Entrepreneurial orientation in turbulent environments: The moderating role of absorptive capacity , 2014 .

[78]  Yina Li Environmental innovation practices and performance: moderating effect of resource commitment , 2014 .

[79]  G. Sánchez-Marín,et al.  CEO reputation and top management team compensation , 2014 .

[80]  Antoaneta P. Petkova How to Judge What Can’t be Seen and Touched? The Contingent Effect of Media Reputation on Young Firms’ Access to Venture Capital , 2014 .

[81]  Nathaniel Boso,et al.  The Form of Relationship between Firm-Level Product Innovativeness and New Product Performance in Developed and Emerging Markets , 2015 .

[82]  S. Sciascia,et al.  Family Ownership and R&D Intensity in Small‐ and Medium‐Sized Firms , 2015 .

[83]  David M. Woisetschläger,et al.  Toward a better understanding of stakeholder participation in the service innovation process: More than one path to success , 2016 .

[84]  Y. Debrah,et al.  Toward a Construct of Liability of Origin , 2016 .

[85]  M. Halme,et al.  Our Collaborative Future: Activities and Roles of Stakeholders in Sustainability-Oriented Innovation , 2017 .

[86]  George Lodorfos,et al.  Barriers to enter in foreign markets: evidence from SMEs in emerging market , 2017 .

[87]  Qingzhong Ma,et al.  Structure in chaos: entrepreneurial reputation effects on performance during volatility , 2017 .

[88]  S. Roper,et al.  Innovation, quality management and learning: Short-term and longer-term effects , 2017 .

[89]  Xuemei Xie,et al.  Female technology entrepreneurs: resource shortages and reputation challenges – a view of institutional support , 2018 .

[90]  Felipe Hernández-Perlines,et al.  The Role of Environment in Sustainable Entrepreneurial Orientation. The Case of Family Firms , 2018, Sustainability.

[91]  J. Amankwah‐Amoah,et al.  Entrepreneurial orientation, environmental sustainability and new venture performance: Does stakeholder integration matter? , 2018, Business Strategy and the Environment.

[92]  Shubham,et al.  Secondary stakeholder pressures and organizational adoption of sustainable operations practices: The mediating role of primary stakeholders , 2018 .

[93]  J. Amankwah‐Amoah,et al.  Can adopting ambitious environmental sustainability initiatives lead to business failures? An analytical framework , 2019, Business Strategy and the Environment.

[94]  W. Phillips,et al.  Going It Alone Won’t Work! The Relational Imperative for Social Innovation in Social Enterprises , 2019 .

[95]  J. Amankwah‐Amoah,et al.  Environmental sustainability orientation, competitive strategy and financial performance , 2019, Business Strategy and the Environment.

[96]  J. Amankwah‐Amoah,et al.  Global sustainability under uncertainty: How do multinationals craft regulatory policies? , 2019, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.

[97]  J. Amankwah‐Amoah,et al.  Stakeholder integration, environmental sustainability orientation and financial performance , 2020, Journal of Business Research.

[98]  J. Amankwah‐Amoah,et al.  Micro-foundations of organizational design and sustainability: The mediating role of learning ambidexterity , 2021 .