Fast wave ultrasonic propagation in trabecular bone: numerical study of the influence of porosity and structural anisotropy.

Our goal is to assess the potential of computational methods as an alternative to analytical models to predict the two longitudinal wave modes observed in cancellous bone and predicted by the Biot theory. A three-dimensional (3D) finite-difference time-domain method is coupled with 34 human femoral trabecular microstructures measured using microcomputed tomography. The main trabecular alignment (MTA) and the degree of anisotropy (DA) were assessed for all samples. DA values were comprised between 1.02 and 1.9. The influence of bone volume fraction (BV/TV) between 5% and 25% on the properties of the fast and slow waves was studied using a dedicated image processing algorithm to modify the initial 3D microstructures. A heuristic method was devised to determine when both wave modes are time separated. The simulations (performed in three perpendicular directions) predicted that both waves generally overlap in time for a direction of propagation perpendicular to the MTA. When these directions are parallel, both waves are separated in time for samples with high DA and BV/TV values. A relationship was found between the least bone volume fraction required for the observation of nonoverlapping waves and the degree of anisotropy: The higher the DA, the lower the least BV/TV.

[1]  G Van der Perre,et al.  A comparison of time-domain and frequency-domain approaches to ultrasonic velocity measurement in trabecular bone. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  P. Zysset,et al.  A combined atomic force microscopy and nanoindentation technique to investigate the elastic properties of bone structural units. , 2001, European cells & materials.

[3]  Shinro Takai,et al.  Development of Novel Ultrasonic Bone Densitometry Using Acoustic Parameters of Cancellous Bone for Fast and Slow Waves , 2006 .

[4]  J. Williams Ultrasonic wave propagation in cancellous and cortical bone: prediction of some experimental results by Biot's theory. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  K. Wear Ultrasonic attenuation in human calcaneus from 0.2 to 1.7 MHz , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[6]  A Hosokawa Simulation of ultrasound propagation through bovine cancellous bone using elastic and Biot's finite-difference time-domain methods. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  W. Lauriks,et al.  Ultrasonic wave propagation in human cancellous bone: application of Biot theory. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  M. Biot Theory of Propagation of Elastic Waves in a Fluid-Saturated Porous Solid. II. Higher Frequency Range , 1956 .

[9]  M. Biot Theory of Propagation of Elastic Waves in a Fluid‐Saturated Porous Solid. I. Low‐Frequency Range , 1956 .

[10]  S. Yoon,et al.  Comparison of acoustic characteristics predicted by Biot's theory and the modified Biot-Attenborough model in cancellous bone. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  R. Strelitzki On the measurement of the velocity of ultrasound in the os calcis using short pulses , 1996 .

[12]  M. Kaczmarek,et al.  Short ultrasonic waves in cancellous bone. , 2002, Ultrasonics.

[13]  G Berger,et al.  In vitro assessment of the relationship between acoustic properties and bone mass density of the calcaneus by comparison of ultrasound parametric imaging and quantitative computed tomography. , 1997, Bone.

[14]  M. Laval-jeantet,et al.  Ultrasound attenuation imaging in the os calcis: an improved method. , 1994, Ultrasonic imaging.

[15]  F. Padilla,et al.  Effects of frequency-dependent attenuation and velocity dispersion on in vitro ultrasound velocity measurements in intact human femur specimens , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[16]  Maryline Talmant,et al.  Three-dimensional simulations of ultrasonic axial transmission velocity measurement on cortical bone models. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Mark R Holland,et al.  Anomalous negative dispersion in bone can result from the interference of fast and slow waves. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  W Lauriks,et al.  Measuring flow resistivity of porous materials at low frequencies range via acoustic transmitted waves. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  P R White,et al.  Ultrasonic propagation in cancellous bone: a new stratified model. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[20]  P. Laugier,et al.  A method for the estimation of femoral bone mineral density from variables of ultrasound transmission through the human femur. , 2007, Bone.

[21]  P. Nicholson,et al.  The dependence of ultrasonic properties on orientation in human vertebral bone. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  G. Berger,et al.  Broadband ultrasonic attenuation imaging: A new imaging technique of the os calcis , 1994, Calcified Tissue International.

[23]  R. Strelitzki,et al.  Measurement of airborne ultrasonic slow waves in calcaneal cancellous bone. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[24]  G. L. Bretthorst,et al.  Bayesian estimation of the underlying bone properties from mixed fast and slow mode ultrasonic signals. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  J. Kinney,et al.  Relationship Between Plain Radiographic Patterns and Three- dimensional Trabecular Architecture in The Human Calcaneus , 1999, Osteoporosis International.

[26]  E. Bossy,et al.  Three-dimensional simulation of ultrasound propagation through trabecular bone structures measured by synchrotron microtomography , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  P. Laugier,et al.  Phase and group velocities of fast and slow compressional waves in trabecular bone. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Maurice A. Biot,et al.  Generalized Theory of Acoustic Propagation in Porous Dissipative Media , 1962 .

[29]  V Bousson,et al.  In vitro ultrasonic characterization of human cancellous femoral bone using transmission and backscatter measurements: relationships to bone mineral density. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  G. Berger,et al.  Ultrasound parametric imaging of the calcaneus:In vivo results with a new device , 1996, Calcified Tissue International.

[31]  Robin O Cleveland,et al.  Derivation of elastic stiffness from site-matched mineral density and acoustic impedance maps , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[32]  R Barkmann,et al.  Numerical simulation of the dependence of quantitative ultrasonic parameters on trabecular bone microarchitecture and elastic constants. , 2006, Ultrasonics.

[33]  T. Otani,et al.  Quantitative Estimation of Bone Density and Bone Quality Using Acoustic Parameters of Cancellous Bone for Fast and Slow Waves , 2005 .

[34]  H K Genant,et al.  A new method for quantitative ultrasound measurements at multiple skeletal sites: first results of precision and fracture discrimination. , 2000, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[35]  P. Laugier,et al.  In vitro measurement of the frequency-dependent attenuation in cancellous bone between 0.2 and 2 MHz. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  P. Laugier,et al.  Velocity dispersion of acoustic waves in cancellous bone , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[37]  Laurent Sedel,et al.  In Vitro Acoustic Waves Propagation in Human and Bovine Cancellous Bone , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[38]  J. Wu,et al.  Measurement of velocity and attenuation of shear waves in bovine compact bone using ultrasonic spectroscopy. , 1997, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[39]  F. Patat,et al.  Bidirectional axial transmission can improve accuracy and precision of ultrasonic velocity measurement in cortical bone: a validation on test materials , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[40]  P. Levitz,et al.  Fractal Dimension of Trabecular Bone Projection Texture Is Related to Three‐Dimensional Microarchitecture , 2000, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[41]  B. Stampa,et al.  Assessment of the Geometry of Human Finger Phalanges Using Quantitative Ultrasound In Vivo , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[42]  Regular ArticleUltrasound Attenuation Imaging in the Os Calcis: An Improved Method , 1994 .

[43]  P Rüegsegger,et al.  Do quantitative ultrasound measurements reflect structure independently of density in human vertebral cancellous bone? , 1998, Bone.

[44]  K. Wear,et al.  Measurements of phase velocity and group velocity in human calcaneus. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[45]  P Rüegsegger,et al.  Micro-CT examinations of trabecular bone samples at different resolutions: 14, 7 and 2 micron level. , 1998, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[46]  F. Padilla,et al.  Optimal Prediction of Bone Mineral Density with Ultrasonic Measurements in Excised Human Femur , 2005, Calcified Tissue International.

[47]  C. Simmons,et al.  Method‐Based Differences in the Automated Analysis of the Three‐Dimensional Morphology of Trabecular Bone , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[48]  A. Hosokawa,et al.  Acoustic anisotropy in bovine cancellous bone. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  C. Langton,et al.  The measurement of broadband ultrasonic attenuation in cancellous bone. , 1984, Engineering in medicine.

[50]  Robert W. Graves,et al.  Simulating seismic wave propagation in 3D elastic media using staggered-grid finite differences , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[51]  G. Pharr,et al.  The elastic properties of trabecular and cortical bone tissues are similar: results from two microscopic measurement techniques. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[52]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[53]  Kang I L Lee,et al.  Correlations between acoustic properties and bone density in bovine cancellous bone from 0.5 to 2 MHz. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[54]  T G Leighton,et al.  Empirical angle-dependent Biot and MBA models for acoustic anisotropy in cancellous bone , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[55]  Françoise Peyrin,et al.  Variation of Ultrasonic Parameters With Microstructure and Material Properties of Trabecular Bone: A 3D Model Simulation , 2007, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[56]  Andres Laib,et al.  Comparison of measurements of phase velocity in human calcaneus to Biot theory. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[57]  W. Hayes,et al.  A 20-year perspective on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone. , 1993, Journal of biomechanical engineering.