Nominative-partitive alternation in subject marking in Estonian occurs mainly in existentials and related constructions. The paper measures the overall frequency of use of partitive subjects (PS) in Estonian dialects to explore whether differences are found, which can be explained by language contacts. Second, it provides an overview of constructions where PSs occur in Estonian dialects. The data is obtained from the Corpus of Estonian Dialects (12 subdialects, 1517 instances of PS usage). The results show that in usage frequency of PSs, Estonian dialects are relatively uniform and there are no striking differences between the dialects. The use of PSs was less frequent in Northern-Seto (a South-Estonian subdialect, in the Russian contact area), where the use of PSs is more tightly associated with negative clauses than it is in other dialects. Negation is also generally the most powerful factor conditioning the use of PSs (explains 52% of the usages of PSs). Kokkuvote. Liina Lindstrom: Partitiivsubjekt eesti murretes. Nominatiivipartitiivi vaheldumine subjekti markeerimisel toimub eesti keeles peamiselt eksitentsiaallausetes ja sellega sarnastes konstruktsioonides. Artiklis moodetakse partitiivsubjekti esinemissagedust eesti murretes, et leida, kas murrete vahel on olulisi erinevusi partiivsubjekti kasutamisel, ja kas neid erinevusi saab selgitada keelekontaktide mojuga. Lisaks vaadeldakse konstruktsioone, kus partitiivsubjekt uldse voib esineda. Andmed on parit eesti murrete korpusest (12 eri murrakut, kokku 1517 partitiivsubjekti kasutusjuhtu). Artiklist selgub, et partitiivsubjekti kasutuse pohjal on eesti murded kullalt sarnased. Pisut vahem kasutati partitiivsubjekti Pohja-Seto tekstides, kus see oli tugevamalt seotud eitusega kui mujal. Eitus oli ka uldiselt koige olulisem partitiivsubjekti kasutamist mojutav tegur (52% partitiivsubjektiga lausetest olid eitavad). Votmesonad : murdesuntaks; partitiivsubjekt; eristav subjekti markeerimine; eesti murded
[1]
Barbara H. Partee,et al.
Russian Genitive of Negation Alternations: The Role of Verb Semantics
,
2011
.
[2]
Lembit Vaba.
KUIDAS LÄTI-EESTI KEELEKONTAKT ON MÕJUTANUD EESTI MURDEKEELE GRAMMATIKAT JA SÕNAMOODUSTUST
,
2011,
ESA 2011.
[3]
Ilja A. Seržant,et al.
The Independent Partitive Genitive in North Russian
,
2017
.
[4]
David R. Dowty.
Thematic proto-roles and argument selection
,
1991
.
[5]
Helena Metslang.
5. Partitive noun phrases in the Estonian core argument system
,
2014
.
[6]
Ellen F. Prince,et al.
Toward a taxonomy of given-new information
,
1981
.
[7]
Arvo Laanest.
Sissejuhatus läänemeresoome keeltesse
,
1975
.
[8]
The partitive case in existential and copula clauses in Balto-Finnic
,
2008
.
[9]
Marja-Liisa Helasvuo,et al.
On the subject of subject in Finnish
,
2015
.
[10]
Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm,et al.
The Circum-Baltic languages : an areal-typological approach
,
2001
.
[11]
Merlijn de Smit,et al.
Primary Argument Case-marking in Baltic and Finnic
,
2013
.
[12]
Å. Viberg.
Swedish Impersonal Constructions from a Cross- linguistic Perspective An Exploratory Corpus-based Study
,
2010
.
[13]
Ilja A. Seržant.
The Independent Partitive as an Eastern Circum-Baltic isogloss
,
2015
.
[14]
The world is raining: Meteorological predicates and their subjects in a typological perspective
,
2015
.
[15]
Aspektuaalisen objektin synty
,
1991
.
[16]
Matti Miestamo,et al.
Partitives and negation : A cross-linguistic survey
,
2014
.
[17]
Liina Lindström,et al.
Parsing Corpus of Estonian Dialects
,
2009
.
[18]
Alan Timberlake,et al.
A reference grammar of Russian
,
2004
.
[19]
Balthasar Bickel,et al.
Grammatical Relations Typology
,
2010
.
[20]
On the Case-Marking of Existential Subjects in Estonian
,
2013
.
[21]
L. Larsson,et al.
Baltic influence on Finnic languages
,
2001
.