Approximation Metrics for Discrete and Continuous Systems

Established system relationships for discrete systems, such as language inclusion, simulation, and bisimulation, require system observations to be identical. When interacting with the physical world, modeled by continuous or hybrid systems, exact relationships are restrictive and not robust. In this paper, we develop the first framework of system approximation that applies to both discrete and continuous systems by developing notions of approximate language inclusion, approximate simulation, and approximate bisimulation relations. We define a hierarchy of approximation pseudo-metrics between two systems that quantify the quality of the approximation, and capture the established exact relationships as zero sections. Our approximation framework is compositional for a synchronous composition operator. Algorithms are developed for computing the proposed pseudo-metrics, both exactly and approximately. The exact algorithms require the generalization of the fixed point algorithms for computing simulation and bisimulation relations, or dually, the solution of a static game whose cost is the so-called branching distance between the systems. Approximations for the pseudo-metrics can be obtained by considering Lyapunov-like functions called simulation and bisimulation functions. We illustrate our approximation framework in reducing the complexity of safety verification problems for both deterministic and nondeterministic continuous systems

[1]  Ian M. Mitchell,et al.  Level Set Methods for Computation in Hybrid Systems , 2000, HSCC.

[2]  Antoine Girard,et al.  Approximate Simulation Relations for Hybrid Systems , 2008, Discret. Event Dyn. Syst..

[3]  Paulo Tabuada,et al.  Bisimilar control affine systems , 2004, Syst. Control. Lett..

[4]  George J. Pappas,et al.  Approximate Bisimulations for Constrained Linear Systems , 2005, Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[5]  A. Agung Julius,et al.  A behavioral framework for compositionality: linear systems, discrete event systems and hybrid systems , 2004 .

[6]  Sérgio Vale Aguiar Campos,et al.  Symbolic Model Checking , 1993, CAV.

[7]  Maria Domenica Di Benedetto,et al.  Bisimulation theory for switching linear systems , 2004, 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601).

[8]  E. Clarke,et al.  Symbolic Model Checking : IO * ’ States and Beyond * , 1992 .

[9]  Edmund M. Clarke,et al.  Symbolic Model Checking: 10^20 States and Beyond , 1990, Inf. Comput..

[10]  Robin Milner,et al.  Communication and concurrency , 1989, PHI Series in computer science.

[11]  Albert Benveniste,et al.  Toward an Approximation Theory for Computerised Control , 2002, EMSOFT.

[12]  Luca de Alfaro,et al.  Linear and Branching Metrics for Quantitative Transition Systems , 2004, ICALP.

[13]  Arjan van der Schaft,et al.  Equivalence of dynamical systems by bisimulation , 2004, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[14]  Chris Hankin,et al.  Quantitative Relations and Approximate Process Equivalences , 2003, CONCUR.

[15]  A. J. van der Schaft Equivalence of dynamical systems by bisimulation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[16]  Paulo Tabuada,et al.  Bisimulation relations for dynamical, control, and hybrid systems , 2005, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[17]  George J. Pappas Bisimilar linear systems , 2003, Autom..

[18]  Fernando Paganini,et al.  IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control , 2006 .

[19]  B. Krogh,et al.  Reachability analysis of hybrid control systems using reduced-order models , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference.

[20]  George J. Pappas,et al.  Discrete abstractions of hybrid systems , 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[21]  Ashish Tiwari,et al.  Series of Abstractions for Hybrid Automata , 2002, HSCC.

[22]  Bruce H. Krogh,et al.  Verification of Polyhedral-Invariant Hybrid Automata Using Polygonal Flow Pipe Approximations , 1999, HSCC.

[23]  Antoine Girard,et al.  Reachability of Uncertain Linear Systems Using Zonotopes , 2005, HSCC.

[24]  Edmund M. Clarke,et al.  Model Checking , 1999, Handbook of Automated Reasoning.

[25]  George J. Pappas,et al.  Approximate Bisimulations for Nonlinear Dynamical Systems , 2005, Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[26]  Rasmus Ejlers Møgelberg,et al.  Proceedings of the 22nd Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science , 2007 .

[27]  Olivier Bournez,et al.  Approximate Reachability Analysis of Piecewise-Linear Dynamical Systems , 2000, HSCC.

[28]  A. Schaft,et al.  Bisimulation theory for switching linear systems , 2004, 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601).

[29]  Radha Jagadeesan,et al.  Metrics for labelled Markov processes , 2004, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[30]  Eugene Asarin,et al.  Abstraction by Projection and Application to Multi-affine Systems , 2004, HSCC.

[31]  Jean-Pierre Aubin,et al.  Viability theory , 1991 .

[32]  Rajeev Alur,et al.  Reachability Analysis of Hybrid Systems via Predicate Abstraction , 2002, HSCC.

[33]  Nicolas Markey,et al.  Non-deterministic Temporal Logics for General Flow Systems , 2004, HSCC.

[34]  Luca de Alfaro,et al.  Linear and Branching System Metrics , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[35]  Joël Ouaknine,et al.  An Intrinsic Characterization of Approximate Probabilistic Bisimilarity , 2003, FoSSaCS.

[36]  G. Ewald Combinatorial Convexity and Algebraic Geometry , 1996 .

[37]  Ali Jadbabaie,et al.  Safety Verification of Hybrid Systems Using Barrier Certificates , 2004, HSCC.

[38]  D. Sorensen,et al.  A Survey of Model Reduction Methods for Large-Scale Systems , 2000 .

[39]  Scott A. Smolka,et al.  CCS expressions, finite state processes, and three problems of equivalence , 1983, PODC '83.