Analysis of the Copenhagen Accord pledges and its global climatic impacts—a snapshot of dissonant ambitions

This analysis of the Copenhagen Accord evaluates emission reduction pledges by individual countries against the Accord's climate-related objectives. Probabilistic estimates of the climatic consequences for a set of resulting multi-gas scenarios over the 21st century are calculated with a reduced complexity climate model, yielding global temperature increase and atmospheric CO2 and CO2-equivalent concentrations. Provisions for banked surplus emission allowances and credits from land use, land-use change and forestry are assessed and are shown to have the potential to lead to significant deterioration of the ambition levels implied by the pledges in 2020. This analysis demonstrates that the Copenhagen Accord and the pledges made under it represent a set of dissonant ambitions. The ambition level of the current pledges for 2020 and the lack of commonly agreed goals for 2050 place in peril the Accord's own ambition: to limit global warming to below 2 °C, and even more so for 1.5 °C, which is referenced in the Accord in association with potentially strengthening the long-term temperature goal in 2015. Due to the limited level of ambition by 2020, the ability to limit emissions afterwards to pathways consistent with either the 2 or 1.5 °C goal is likely to become less feasible.

[1]  Pushpam Kumar.  Agriculture (Chapter8) in IPCC, 2007: Climate change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[2]  P. Lucas,et al.  Downscaling drivers of global environmental change Enabling use of global SRES scenarios at the national and grid levels , 2007 .

[3]  David S. Lee,et al.  Flying into the future: aviation emissions scenarios to 2050. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  J. Fuglestvedt,et al.  Contributions of individual countries’ emissions to climate change and their uncertainty , 2011 .

[5]  Tom M. L. Wigley,et al.  Multi-Gas Forcing Stabilization with Minicam , 2006 .

[6]  A. Bowen,et al.  Mitigating climate change through reductions in greenhouse gas emissions: the science and economics of future paths for global annual emissions , 2009 .

[7]  Joeri Rogelj,et al.  Copenhagen Accord pledges are paltry , 2010, Nature.

[8]  Ken Caldeira,et al.  Coral reefs may start dissolving when atmospheric CO2 doubles , 2009 .

[9]  J. Edmonds,et al.  Scenarios of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Atmospheric Concentrations , 2007 .

[10]  Michel G.J. den Elzen,et al.  Multi-gas Emissions Pathways to Meet Climate Targets , 2006 .

[11]  J. Edmonds,et al.  Implications of Limiting CO2 Concentrations for Land Use and Energy , 2009, Science.

[12]  Tom M. L. Wigley,et al.  Emulating IPCC AR4 atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models for projecting global-mean, hemispheric and land/ocean temperatures: MAGICC 6.0 , 2008 .

[13]  Francis W. Zwiers,et al.  Guidance Note for Lead Authors of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report on Consistent Treatment of Uncertainties , 2010 .

[14]  P. Jones,et al.  Uncertainty estimates in regional and global observed temperature changes: A new data set from 1850 , 2006 .

[15]  N. Meinshausen,et al.  Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C , 2009, Nature.

[16]  T. Lenton,et al.  The coral reef crisis: the critical importance of<350 ppm CO2. , 2009, Marine pollution bulletin.

[17]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  Scenarios of long-term socio-economic and environmental development under climate stabilization , 2007 .

[18]  F. Joos,et al.  Imminent ocean acidification in the Arctic projected with the NCAR global coupled carbon cycle-climate model , 2009 .

[19]  Vincent R. Gray.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers , 2007 .

[20]  N. Höhne,et al.  Sharing the reduction effort to limit global warming to 2°C , 2010 .

[21]  Michel G.J. den Elzen,et al.  Postponing emission reductions from 2020 to 2030 increases climate risks and long-term costs , 2010 .

[22]  Joeri Rogelj,et al.  Decision support for international climate policy - The PRIMAP emission module , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[23]  Richard J. Matear,et al.  Southern Ocean acidification: A tipping point at 450-ppm atmospheric CO2 , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  J. Randerson,et al.  Global fire emissions and the contribution of deforestation, savanna, forest, agricultural, and peat fires (1997-2009) , 2010 .

[25]  M. Thring.  World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[26]  Scott C. Doney,et al.  Ocean acidification: the other CO2 problem. , 2009, Annual review of marine science.

[27]  J. Bruno,et al.  The Impact of Climate Change on the World’s Marine Ecosystems , 2010, Science.

[28]  N. Höhne,et al.  Reductions of greenhouse gas emissions in Annex I and non-Annex I countries for meeting concentration stabilisation targets , 2008 .

[29]  Andrew Macintosh,et al.  Keeping warming within the 2 °C limit after Copenhagen , 2010 .

[30]  Josep G. Canadell,et al.  Current and future CO 2 emissions from drained peatlands in Southeast Asia , 2009 .

[31]  R. Feely,et al.  Ocean acidification: the other CO2 problem. , 2009, Annual review of marine science.

[32]  D. P. Vuuren,et al.  Evaluation of the Copenhagen Accord. Chances and risks for the 2C climate goal , 2010 .