A test of a pattern recognition system for identification of spiders

Growing interest in biodiversity and conservation has increased the demand for accurate and consistent identification of arthropods. Unfortunately, professional taxonomists are already overburdened and underfunded and their numbers are not increasing with significant speed to meet the demand. In an effort to bridge the gap between professional taxonomists and non-specialists by making the results of taxonomic research more accessible, we present a partially automated pattern recognition system utilizing artificial neural networks (ANNs). Various artificial neural networks were trained to identify spider species using only digital images of female genitalia, from which key shape information had been extracted by wavelet transform. Three different sized networks were evaluated based on their ability to discriminate a test set of six species to either the genus or the species level. The species represented three genera of the wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae). The largest network achieved the highest accuracy, identifying specimens to the correct genus 100% of the time and to the correct species an average of 81% of the time. In addition, the networks were most accurate when identifying specimens in a hierarchical system, first to genus and then to species. This test system was surprisingly accurate considering the small size of our training set.

[1]  Scott E. Fahlman,et al.  An empirical study of learning speed in back-propagation networks , 1988 .

[2]  Christian Lebiere,et al.  The Cascade-Correlation Learning Architecture , 1989, NIPS.

[3]  Phil F. Culverhouse,et al.  Biological pattern recognition by neural networks , 1991 .

[4]  Ciamac C. Moallemi,et al.  Classifying cells for cancer diagnosis using neural networks , 1991, IEEE Expert.

[5]  G. B. Schaalje,et al.  Identification of ichneumonid wasps using image analysis of wings , 1992 .

[6]  C. W. Morris,et al.  Neural network analysis of flow cytometric data for 40 marine phytoplankton species. , 1994, Cytometry.

[7]  M. Edwards,et al.  The potential for computer-aided identification in biodiversity research. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  G. Davis Systematics and Public HealthThousands of disease organisms and their vectors need to be identified and distinguished accurately , 1995 .

[9]  Amara Lynn Graps,et al.  An introduction to wavelets , 1995 .

[10]  Douglass R. Miller,et al.  Systematics, Biodiversity, and AgricultureSystematic analyses of small but important organisms provide crucial information for improvement of agriculture , 1995 .

[11]  Lynne Boddy,et al.  A comparison of some neural and non-neural methods for identification of phytoplankton from flow cytometry data , 1996, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[12]  Kevin N. Gurney,et al.  An introduction to neural networks , 2018 .

[13]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Automating the identification of insects: a new solution to an old problem , 1997 .