Economic competitiveness of III–V on silicon tandem one‐sun photovoltaic solar modules in favorable future scenarios

Tandem modules combining a III–V top cell with a Si bottom cell offer the potential to increase the solar energy conversion efficiency of one-sun photovoltaic modules beyond 25%, while fully utilizing the global investment that has been made in Si photovoltaics manufacturing. At present, the cost of III–V cells is far too high for this approach to be competitive for one-sun terrestrial power applications. We investigated the system-level economic benefits of both GaAs/Si and InGaP/Si tandem modules in favorable future scenarios where the cost of III–V cells is substantially reduced, perhaps to less than the cost of Si cells. We found, somewhat unexpectedly, that these tandems can reduce installed system cost only when the area-related balance-of-system cost is high, such as for area-constrained residential rooftop systems in the USA. When area-related balance-of-system cost is lower, such as for utility-scale systems, the tandem module offers no benefit. This is because a system using tandem modules is more expensive than one using single-junction Si modules when III–V cells are expensive, and a system using tandem modules is more expensive than one using single-junction III–V modules when III–V cells are inexpensive. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Michael Woodhouse,et al.  Technology advances needed for photovoltaics to achieve widespread grid price parity , 2016 .

[2]  John F. Geisz,et al.  Progress Towards a 30% Efficient GaInP/Si Tandem Solar Cell , 2015 .

[3]  D. M. Powell,et al.  Modeling the Cost and Minimum Sustainable Price of Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Manufacturing in the United States , 2013, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[4]  D. M. Powell,et al.  Assessing the drivers of regional trends in solar photovoltaic manufacturing , 2013 .

[5]  S. A. Ringel,et al.  Epitaxially-grown metamorphic GaAsP/Si dual-junction solar cells , 2013, 2013 IEEE 39th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC).

[6]  R. Margolis,et al.  A wafer-based monocrystalline silicon photovoltaics road map: Utilizing known technology improvement opportunities for further reductions in manufacturing costs , 2013 .

[7]  M. Woodhouse,et al.  Manufacturing Cost Analysis Relevant to Single-and Dual-Junction Photovoltaic Cells Fabricated with III-Vs and III-Vs Grown on Czochralski Silicon (Presentation) , 2014 .

[8]  N. Pan Epitaxial lift-off of large-area GaAs multi-junction solar cells for high efficiency clean and portable energy power generation , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Semiconductor Electronics (ICSE2014).

[9]  Paul A. Basore,et al.  Understanding Manufacturing Cost Influence on Future Trends in Silicon Photovoltaics , 2014, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[10]  Y. Arakawa,et al.  III-V/Si hybrid photonic devices by direct fusion bonding , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[11]  D. A. Clugston,et al.  PC1D version 5: 32-bit solar cell modeling on personal computers , 1997, Conference Record of the Twenty Sixth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 1997.

[12]  Michael Woodhouse,et al.  Techno‐economic analysis of three different substrate removal and reuse strategies for III‐V solar cells , 2016 .

[13]  Tonio Buonassisi,et al.  Crystalline silicon photovoltaics: a cost analysis framework for determining technology pathways to reach baseload electricity costs , 2012 .

[14]  Jccm Boukje Huijben,et al.  26.1% thin-film GaAs solar cell using epitaxial lift-off , 2009 .