The overlap model: a model of letter position coding.

Recent research has shown that letter identity and letter position are not integral perceptual dimensions (e.g., jugde primes judge in word-recognition experiments). Most comprehensive computational models of visual word recognition (e.g., the interactive activation model, J. L. McClelland & D. E. Rumelhart, 1981, and its successors) assume that the position of each letter within a word is perfectly encoded. Thus, these models are unable to explain the presence of effects of letter transposition (trial-trail), letter migration (beard-bread), repeated letters (moose-mouse), or subset/superset effects (faulty-faculty). The authors extend R. Ratcliff's (1981) theory of order relations for encoding of letter positions and show that the model can successfully deal with these effects. The basic assumption is that letters in the visual stimulus have distributions over positions so that the representation of one letter will extend into adjacent letter positions. To test the model, the authors conducted a series of forced-choice perceptual identification experiments. The overlap model produced very good fits to the empirical data, and even a simplified 2-parameter model was capable of producing fits for 104 observed data points with a correlation coefficient of .91.

[1]  M. Sigman,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.9 No.7 July 2005 The neural code for written words: a proposal , 2022 .

[2]  S. Andrews Lexical Retrieval and Selection Processes: Effects of Transposed-Letter Confusability , 1996 .

[3]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[4]  Manuel Perea,et al.  European Journal of Cognitive Psychology Transposed-letter Similarity Effects in Naming Pseudowords: Evidence from Children and Adults , 2022 .

[5]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. , 1997, Psychological review.

[6]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Transposed-Letter Confusability Effects in Masked Form Priming , 2003 .

[7]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Neighborhood-frequency effects when primes and targets are of different lengths , 2000, Psychological research.

[8]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. , 1998, Psychological review.

[9]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  A study of relative-position priming with superset primes. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  Chris Davis,et al.  Word recognition development in children: Insights from masked priming , 2003 .

[11]  R Ratcliff,et al.  A bias interpretation of facilitation in perceptual identification. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye Movement Control during Reading: Evidence for Direct Control , 1981, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[13]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception , 2004 .

[14]  N. Friedmann,et al.  Letter Position Dyslexia , 2001, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[15]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Do transposed-letter effects occur across lexeme boundaries? , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[16]  R Ivry,et al.  A formal theory of feature binding in object perception. , 1996, Psychological review.

[17]  W. Estes The Locus of Inferential and Perceptual Processes in Letter Identification. , 1975 .

[18]  R Ratcliff,et al.  A counter model for implicit priming in perceptual word identification. , 1997, Psychological review.

[19]  W. Estes,et al.  Serial position functions for letter identification at brief and extended exposure durations , 1976 .

[20]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A model of the go/no-go task. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[21]  K. Forster,et al.  Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[22]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .

[23]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Do Transposed-Letter Similarity Effects Occur at a Prelexical Phonological Level? , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  R S Berndt,et al.  A new model of letter string encoding: simulating right neglect dyslexia. , 1999, Progress in brain research.

[25]  Rebecca L. Johnson,et al.  The flexibility of letter coding: Nonadjacent letter transposition effects in the parafovea , 2007 .

[26]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions , 1998 .

[27]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Masked priming effects with syllabic neighbors in a lexical decision task. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  Manuel Perea,et al.  The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers. , 2008, British journal of psychology.

[29]  G. Logan,et al.  Evaluating a computational model of perceptual grouping by proximity , 1993, Perception & Psychophysics.

[30]  Naama Friedmann,et al.  Letter Form as a Constraint for Errors in Neglect Dyslexia and Letter Position Dyslexia , 2006, Behavioural neurology.

[31]  J. Hoffmann,et al.  The European Society for Cognitive Psychology , 1999 .

[32]  Robin L. Hill,et al.  Eye movements : a window on mind and brain , 2007 .

[33]  K. Forster,et al.  Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? , 1987 .

[34]  J. Bowers Masked priming: State of the Art , 2003 .

[35]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. , 1982, Psychological review.

[36]  M. Mozer Letter migration in word perception. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  R W Proctor,et al.  Order-relevant and order-irrelevant decision rules in multiletter matching. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[38]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Transposed-letter effects in reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[40]  J. Bowers,et al.  Automatic semantic activation of embedded words: Is there a hat in that? , 2005 .

[41]  P. G. Vos,et al.  Configurational effects on the enumeration of dots: Counting by groups , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[42]  L E Krueger,et al.  A theory of perceptual matching. , 1978, Psychological review.

[43]  J. H. Bertera,et al.  Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Effects of Syllable Frequency and Syllable Neighborhood Frequency in Visual Word Recognition , 1998 .

[45]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[46]  K. Forster,et al.  REPETITION PRIMING AND FREQUENCY ATTENUATION IN LEXICAL ACCESS , 1984 .

[47]  A. Treisman,et al.  Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[48]  G. Logan The CODE theory of visual attention: an integration of space-based and object-based attention. , 1996, Psychological review.

[49]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[50]  Jeffrey S Bowers,et al.  Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: evidence from orthographic similarity effects. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Eye movements when reading transposed text: the importance of word-beginning letters. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[52]  Manuel Perea,et al.  The frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[53]  V. M. Holmes,et al.  Word-Specific Knowledge, Word-Recognition Strategies, and Spelling Ability , 1993 .

[54]  Mozer,et al.  Early parallel processing in reading: a connectionist approach. Technical report, April-November 1986 , 1986 .

[55]  Colin J. Davis,et al.  The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. , 2001 .

[56]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks , 2008, Neural Computation.

[57]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[58]  Timothy R. Jordan,et al.  Presenting words without interior letters: Superiority over single letters and influence of postmask boundaries. , 1990 .

[59]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Statistical Models in S , 1991 .

[60]  Dennis Norris,et al.  The Bayesian reader: explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. , 2006, Psychological review.

[61]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging on letter discrimination. , 2003, Psychology and aging.

[62]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition , 1998 .

[63]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction , 2008 .

[64]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: the CDP+ model of reading aloud. , 2007, Psychological review.

[65]  M. Coltheart Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading , 1987 .

[66]  Michiel P. van Oeffelen,et al.  An algorithm for pattern description on the level of relative proximity , 1983, Pattern Recognit..

[67]  Sarah J. White,et al.  Raeding Wrods With Jubmled Lettres , 2006, Psychological science.

[68]  R. Ratcliff Theoretical interpretations of the speed and accuracy of positive and negative responses. , 1985, Psychological review.

[69]  J. Grainger,et al.  Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters , 2004 .

[70]  Patrick Bonin,et al.  Mental lexicon : "some words to talk about words" , 2004 .

[71]  R. Ivry,et al.  A probabilistic multidimensional model of location information , 1994, Psychological research.

[72]  A. Healy,et al.  Task-specific serial position effects in comparisons of multiletter strings , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[73]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Reading Disappearing Text , 2003, Psychological science.

[74]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Orthographic Neighbours are not all Equal: Evidence using an Identification Technique , 1998, Language and Cognitive Processes.

[75]  Jeffrey S Bowers,et al.  What do letter migration errors reveal about letter position coding in visual word recognition? , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[76]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Speed and accuracy of same and different responses in perceptual matching , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[77]  Carol Whitney,et al.  Comparison of the SERIOL and SOLAR theories of letter-position encoding , 2008, Brain and Language.

[78]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. , 2004, Psychological review.

[79]  S. Lupker,et al.  Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[80]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[81]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Lexical competition is enhanced in the left hemisphere: Evidence from different types of orthographic neighbors , 2008, Brain and Language.

[82]  C. Whitney How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[83]  Michal Lavidor,et al.  Facilitative orthographic neighborhood effects: The SERIOL model account , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[84]  S. M. Chambers Letter and order information in lexical access , 1979 .

[85]  R. Ratcliff A theory of order relations in perceptual matching. , 1981 .

[86]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[87]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. , 1999, Psychological review.

[88]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  A diffusion model account of masking in two-choice letter identification. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[89]  S. Lupker,et al.  Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions ☆ , 2004 .

[90]  Jerome S. Bruner,et al.  A Note on the Informativeness of Parts of Words , 1958 .

[91]  Jon Andoni Duñabeitia,et al.  Transposed-letter priming effects for close versus distant transpositions. , 2008, Experimental psychology.

[92]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and Performance VI , 1978 .

[93]  W. Estes,et al.  Order and position in primary memory for letter strings , 1977 .

[94]  Manuel Perea,et al.  The effect of neighborhood frequency in reading: Evidence with transposed-letter neighbors , 2008, Cognition.

[95]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Letter position information and printed word perception: the relative-position priming constraint. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[96]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[97]  Kenneth I. Forster,et al.  Masked form priming with extreme transposition , 2008 .