Climate, clothing and body-part nomenclature

Several recent studies describe polysemous relationships that occur widely in languages. For example, approximately two-thirds of the languages of the world use a single term to designate both "wood" and "tree" (Witkowski, Brown, and Chase 1981), and almost one-half merge "eye" and "face" under a single term (Brown and Witkowski 1983). This paper documents occurrences of widespread polysemy involving terms for parts of human limbs.1 For instance, many geographically and genetically unrelated languages use a single term to denote "hand" and "arm" (hand/arm polysemy) and many equate "foot" and "leg" (foot/leg polysemy). Polysemy plays an important role in lexical change. The development of polysemy is a common means whereby languages encode new referents or alter the encoding of existing ones (Brown and Witkowski 1983). Typically this involves expanding a word for one referent to another when both referents bear a common "meaning relation" to one another (cf. Casagrande and Hale 1967; Lyons 1963, 1977). For example, hand is related to arm, and foot to leg, through physical connection or spatial contiguity. These limb parts are also components of the upper and lower limb respectively. In addition to these meaning relations, others such as class inclusion and likeness/resemblance often mediate polysemy development (Brown 1979a; Brown and Witkowski 1983). Development of polysemy typically involves extending a term for a high salience referent to one of low salience (Brown and Witkowski 1983). Referents may be high in salience for humans due to intrinsic properties that make them perceptually very distinct (Berlin, Boster, and O'Neill 1981; Hunn 1977) or because they are culturally very important (Witkowski and Brown 1983) or because of both of these factors. Labels associated with high salience referents tend strongly to be "unmarked" in languages; i.e., they are more frequent in use, simpler in form, and acquired earlier by children learning language than "marked" labels associated with low salience referents (Greenberg 1966, 1975). Evidence presented here indicates that hand and foot are regularly of high salience for humans compared to arm and leg respectively. Similarly, terms for the former are typically unmarked in languages compared to terms for the latter. Hence, polysemy development has commonly involved expansion of "hand" terms to arm and "foot" terms to leg rather than the reverse direction. The existence?and consequent cultural importance?of extensive wearing apparel in a society negatively influences the occurrence of limb polysemy. The presence of elaborate tailored clothing covering the limbs greatly increases the distinctiveness of limb parts and renders more likely their labeling by separate terms. In addition, ancillary apparel such as gloves, mittens, socks, shoes, and

[1]  Raoul Naroll,et al.  What Have We Learned from Cross‐Cultural Surveys?1 , 1970 .

[2]  George Kingsley Zipf,et al.  Human behavior and the principle of least effort , 1949 .

[3]  James Owen Dorsey,et al.  A dictionary of the Biloxi and Ofo languages, accompanied with thirty-one Biloxi texts and numerous Biloxi phrases , 1912 .

[4]  Cecil H. Brown,et al.  MARKING-REVERSALS AND CULTURAL IMPORTANCE , 1983 .

[5]  English-Armenian and Armenian-English concise dictionary , 1944 .

[6]  E. Bowden.  Standardization of an Index of Sociocultural Development for Precivilized Societies , 1972 .

[7]  An English Albanian Dictionary , 1957 .

[8]  Oswald Werner,et al.  A Lexemic Typology of Navajo Anatomical Terms I: The Foot , 1970, International Journal of American Linguistics.

[9]  Ernest E. Heimbach.  White Meo - English dictionary , 1971, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[10]  Mary R. Haas,et al.  THAI-ENGLISH, STUDENT'S DICTIONARY. , 1964 .

[11]  Andrés Lionnet.  Los elementos de la lengua Tarahumara , 1972 .

[12]  Gordon Innes,et al.  A Mende-English Dictionary , 1969 .

[13]  Aileen A. Reid,et al.  Diccionario totonaco de Papantla, Veracruz: totonaco-espanol, espanol-totonaco@@@Diccionario totonaco de Xicotepec de Juarez, Puebla: totonaco-castellano, castellano-totonaco , 1977 .

[14]  Cecil H. Brown,et al.  An Explanation of Color Nomenclature Universale , 1977 .

[15]  Malcolm W. Mintz.  Bikol Dictionary. PALI Language Texts: Philippines. , 1971 .

[16]  David B. Kronenfeld,et al.  sibling typology: beyond Nerlove and Romney1 , 1974 .

[17]  Carl Darling Buck.  A dictionary of selected synonyms in the principal Indo-European languages , 1949 .

[18]  W. Shipley.  Maidu texts and dictionary , 1963 .

[19]  G. Murdock,et al.  Measurement of cultural complexity , 1973 .

[20]  C. Doke,et al.  English-Zulu dictionary , 1958 .

[21]  Alphonse G. Juilland,et al.  Frequency dictionary of French words , 1971 .

[22]  R. Naroll,et al.  Maximum Settlement Size: A Compilation , 1974 .

[23]  泉井 久之助.  Buck,Carl D.:A Dictionary of selected synonyms in the principal Indo-European languages.Chicago,1949. , 1951 .

[24]  Ho-min Sohn,et al.  Woleaian-English Dictionary , 1976 .

[25]  G. Zipf,et al.  The Psycho-Biology of Language , 1936 .

[26]  E. Hunn,et al.  Tzeltal folk zoology : the classification of discontinuities in nature , 1979 .

[27]  C. Callaghan.  Lake Miwok Dictionary , 1965 .

[28]  Concise Amharic dictionary : Amharic-English, English-Amharic , 1978 .

[29]  Palauan-English dictionary , 1977 .

[30]  Alphonse G. Juilland,et al.  Frequency Dictionary of Italian Words , 1973 .

[31]  Stairs Kreger,et al.  Diccionario Huave de San Mateo del Mar , 1981 .

[32]  Howard P. McKaughan,et al.  A Maranao dictionary , 1967 .

[33]  Margaret Langdon,et al.  Dictionary of Mesa Grande Diegueño : 'Iipay Aa-English/English-'Iipay Aa , 1973 .

[34]  Cecil H. Brown.  general principles of human anatomical partonomy and speculations on the growth of partonomic nomenclature1 , 1976 .

[35]  C. Bell.  English - Tibetan colloquial dictionary , 1920 .

[36]  Cecil H. Brown,et al.  figurative language In a universalist perspective , 1981 .

[37]  Yapese-English dictionary , 1977 .

[38]  Eric Shen Liu.  Frequency Dictionary of Chinese Words , 1974 .

[39]  J. O. Sawyer.  English-Wappo Vocabulary , 1965 .

[40]  English-Maori Dictionary , 1966 .

[41]  Cecil H. Brown,et al.  WHERE DO TREE TERMS COME FROM , 1981 .

[42]  Harry Hirsch Josselson.  The Russian word count and frequency analysis of grammatical categories of standard literary Russian , 1967 .

[43]  Morris Swadesh.  Elementos del tarasco antiguo , 1969 .

[44]  ethnoanatomy in a multilingual community: an analysis of semantic change1 , 1976 .

[45]  Vocabulario aguaruna de Amazonas , 1966 .

[46]  Cecil H. Brown,et al.  Polysemy, Lexical Change and Cultural Importance , 1983 .

[47]  Stuart A. Schlegel.  Tiruray-English lexicon , 1971 .

[48]  J. M. Schaefer.  A Comparison of Three Measures of Social Complexity1 , 1969 .

[49]  Takaji Abo,et al.  Marshallese-English Dictionary , 1977 .

[50]  Prick van Wely,et al.  Cassell's English-Dutch, Dutch-English dictionary , 1957 .

[51]  S. Elbert,et al.  Hawaiian Dictionary: Hawaiian-English, English-Hawaiian , 1986 .

[52]  Melvin Ember,et al.  Size of Color Lexicon: Interaction of Cultural and Biological Factors , 1978 .

[53]  C. M. Doke,et al.  Zulu-English dictionary, , 1972 .

[54]  W. Leslau.  A dictionary of Moča (Southwestern Ethiopia) , 1959 .