A molecular correlate to the Gleason grading system for prostate adenocarcinoma.

Adenocarcinomas of the prostate can be categorized into tumor grades based on the extent to which the cancers histologically resemble normal prostate glands. Because grades are surrogates of intrinsic tumor behavior, characterizing the molecular phenotype of grade is of potential clinical importance. To identify molecular alterations underlying prostate cancer grades, we used microdissection to obtain specific cohorts of cancer cells corresponding to the most common Gleason patterns (patterns 3, 4, and 5) from 29 radical prostatectomy samples. We paired each cancer sample with matched benign lumenal prostate epithelial cells and profiled transcript abundance levels by microarray analysis. We identified an 86-gene model capable of distinguishing low-grade (pattern 3) from high-grade (patterns 4 and 5) cancers. This model performed with 76% accuracy when applied to an independent set of 30 primary prostate carcinomas. Using tissue microarrays comprising >800 prostate samples, we confirmed a significant association between high levels of monoamine oxidase A expression and poorly differentiated cancers by immunohistochemistry. We also confirmed grade-associated levels of defender against death (DAD1) protein and HSD17 beta4 transcripts by immunohistochemistry and quantitative RT-PCR, respectively. The altered expression of these genes provides functional insights into grade-associated features of therapy resistance and tissue invasion. Furthermore, in identifying a profile of 86 genes that distinguish high- from low-grade carcinomas, we have generated a set of potential targets for modulating the development and progression of the lethal prostate cancer phenotype.

[1]  L. Bubendorf,et al.  Tissue microarray analysis reveals prognostic significance of syndecan‐1 expression in prostate cancer , 2003, The Prostate.

[2]  G. Mills,et al.  The RAB25 small GTPase determines aggressiveness of ovarian and breast cancers , 2004, Nature Medicine.

[3]  A W Partin,et al.  Prognostic significance of Gleason score 3+4 versus Gleason score 4+3 tumor at radical prostatectomy. , 2000, Urology.

[4]  D. Fryback,et al.  Long-term survival among men with conservatively treated localized prostate cancer. , 1995, JAMA.

[5]  T. Wheeler,et al.  Growth and Survival Mechanisms Associated with Perineural Invasion in Prostate Cancer , 2004, Cancer Research.

[6]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Gene expression profiling identifies clinically relevant subtypes of prostate cancer. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  A. Vitiello,et al.  Elevated expression of inhibitor of apoptosis proteins in prostate cancer. , 2003, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[8]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Diagnosis of multiple cancer types by shrunken centroids of gene expression , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  E Helene Sage,et al.  Enhanced expression of SPARC/osteonectin in the tumor-associated stroma of non-small cell lung cancer is correlated with markers of hypoxia/acidity and with poor prognosis of patients. , 2003, Cancer research.

[10]  S. Hayward,et al.  Role of stroma in carcinogenesis of the prostate. , 2002, Differentiation; research in biological diversity.

[11]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: urologic pathologists. , 2001, Human pathology.

[12]  M. Gleave,et al.  YB‐1 is upregulated during prostate cancer tumor progression and increases P‐glycoprotein activity , 2004, The Prostate.

[13]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1992 .

[14]  L. Egevad,et al.  The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma , 2005, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[15]  S. Chetyrkin,et al.  Characterization of a novel type of human microsomal 3alpha -hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase: unique tissue distribution and catalytic properties. , 2001, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[16]  Pierre I Karakiewicz,et al.  International validation of a preoperative nomogram for prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  E. Lander,et al.  Gene expression correlates of clinical prostate cancer behavior. , 2002, Cancer cell.

[18]  A W Partin,et al.  Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional update. , 1997, JAMA.

[19]  J. Epstein,et al.  Gleason score 2-4 adenocarcinoma of the prostate on needle biopsy: a diagnosis that should not be made. , 2000, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[20]  Tapio Visakorpi,et al.  Amplification and Overexpression of Elongin C Gene Discovered in Prostate Cancer by cDNA Microarrays , 2002, Laboratory Investigation.

[21]  R. Sutherland,et al.  Prognostic significance of Gleason pattern in patients with Gleason score 7 prostate carcinoma , 2003, Cancer.

[22]  A. Partin,et al.  Neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate cancer: enhanced prediction of progression after radical prostatectomy. , 1996, Human pathology.

[23]  R. Hruban,et al.  SPARC/osteonectin is a frequent target for aberrant methylation in pancreatic adenocarcinoma and a mediator of tumor–stromal interactions , 2003, Oncogene.

[24]  N. Tonks Redox Redux: Revisiting PTPs and the Control of Cell Signaling , 2005, Cell.

[25]  W. Isaacs,et al.  Peroxisomal branched chain fatty acid β‐oxidation pathway is upregulated in prostate cancer , 2005, The Prostate.

[26]  P. Nelson,et al.  Digital expression profiles of the prostate androgen-response program , 2002, The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[27]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  S. Dhanasekaran,et al.  Delineation of prognostic biomarkers in prostate cancer , 2001, Nature.

[29]  P. Abrahamsson Neuroendocrine differentiation in prostatic carcinoma , 1999, The Prostate.

[30]  B. Mondovì,et al.  Amine oxidases and tumors. , 2004, Neurotoxicology.

[31]  H. Lilja,et al.  Expression and immunolocalisation of neutral endopeptidase in prostate cancer. , 2003, European urology.

[32]  James A Hanley,et al.  Prostate cancer and the Will Rogers phenomenon. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[33]  E. Yorida,et al.  Akt phosphorylates the Y-box binding protein 1 at Ser102 located in the cold shock domain and affects the anchorage-independent growth of breast cancer cells , 2005, Oncogene.

[34]  E. Bergstralh,et al.  Clinical significance of alterations of chromosome 8 detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis in pathologic organ‐confined prostate cancer , 2002, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[35]  Sang Won Kang,et al.  Peroxiredoxins in breast carcinoma. , 2003, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[36]  C. Supuran,et al.  Skewing towards neuroendocrine phenotype in high grade or high stage androgen-responsive primary prostate cancer. , 2005, European urology.

[37]  M. Kattan,et al.  Assessment of the biologic markers p53, ki‐67, and apoptotic index as predictive indicators of prostate carcinoma recurrence after surgery , 1998 .

[38]  G. Sledge,et al.  Paclitaxel sensitivity of breast cancer cells with constitutively active NF-κB is enhanced by IκBα super-repressor and parthenolide , 2000, Oncogene.

[39]  Jeffrey A. Magee,et al.  Expression profiling reveals hepsin overexpression in prostate cancer. , 2001, Cancer research.

[40]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 2002, Technometrics.