Digital Tools for Algebra Education: Criteria and Evaluation

In the Netherlands, as in many other countries, the algebraic expertise of students graduating from secondary education is an issue. The use of digital tools for algebra education is expected to change epistemologies, activity structures and student achievement. Therefore, a study was set up to investigate in what way the use of ICT in upper secondary education might enhance the algebraic expertise of students. One of the first decisions to be made concerned the choice of appropriate digital tools. This paper describes the process of designing and using an instrument for evaluating digital tools. The conceptual framework guiding this process includes notions on symbol sense, instrumental genesis and formative assessment. The evaluation instrument is designed through a Delphi method and provides a blueprint of tool features that are relevant for the purpose of this study. The results show that such an evaluation instrument is valuable both for choosing appropriate digital tools and for making concrete the aims and expectations that researchers have on the issue of integrating technology in algebra education. The final instrument is presented and illustrated through examples implemented in different digital algebra tools.

[1]  Paul Drijvers Context, abstractie en vaardigheid in schoolalgebra , 2006 .

[2]  A. Schoenfeld The Math Wars , 2004 .

[3]  Paul Zorn Algebra, Computer Algebra, and Mathematical Thinking , .

[4]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[5]  Jean-François Nicaud,et al.  Mixing Microworld and Cas Features in Building Computer Systems that Help Students Learn Algebra , 2004, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[6]  Larry Ambrose,et al.  The power of feedback. , 2002, Healthcare executive.

[7]  J. Hattie,et al.  The Power of Feedback , 2007 .

[8]  Luc Trouche,et al.  The didactical challenge of symbolic calculators : turning a computational device into a mathematical instrument , 2005 .

[9]  G. Gibbs,et al.  Conditions Under Which Assessment Supports Students’ Learning , 2005 .

[10]  André Heck,et al.  Using SCORM to monitor student performance: experiences from secondary school practice , 2006 .

[11]  L. Vygotsky Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[12]  Tommy Dreyfus,et al.  STRUCTURE SENSE IN HIGH SCHOOL ALGEBRA: THE EFFECT OF BRACKETS , 2005 .

[13]  Dirk T. Tempelaar Onderwijzen of bijspijkeren , 2007 .

[14]  A Lewis,et al.  The Role of Technology , 2005, Literacy and Augmentative and Alternative Communication.

[15]  P. Black,et al.  Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment , 2010 .

[16]  Anno Van Streun Representations in applying functions , 2000 .

[17]  Pierre Vérillon,et al.  Cognition and artifacts: A contribution to the study of though in relation to instrumented activity , 1995 .

[18]  Claude Dee Moran,et al.  Keeping the faith? , 1990 .

[19]  Y. Chevallard L'analyse des pratiques enseignantes en théorie anthropologique du didactique , 1999 .

[20]  Paul Drijvers,et al.  The Co-Emergence of Machine Techniques, Paper-and-Pencil Techniques, and Theoretical Reflection: A Study of Cas use in Secondary School Algebra , 2006, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[21]  Michèle Artigue,et al.  Learning Mathematics in a CAS Environment: The Genesis of a Reflection about Instrumentation and the Dialectics between Technical and Conceptual Work , 2002, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[22]  Erich Kaltofen,et al.  Computers and Mathematics , 1989, Springer US.

[23]  Discussion Document for the Twelfth ICMI Study The Future of the Teaching and Learning of Algebra , 2000 .

[24]  Joan Bliss,et al.  Tools for Exploratory Learning , 1989 .

[25]  A. Arcavi Symbol Sense: Informal Sense-Making in Formal Mathematics. , 1994 .

[26]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[27]  Francine M Cheater,et al.  Expert consensus on the desirable characteristics of review criteria for improvement of health care quality , 2001 .

[28]  Jana Trgalova,et al.  Developing Interactive Learning Environments that can be used by all the classes having access to computers. The case of Aplusix for algebra , 2006 .

[29]  David Klein,et al.  A quarter century of US ‘math wars’ and political partisanship , 2007 .

[30]  D. Nicol,et al.  Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice , 2006 .

[31]  André Heck,et al.  Mathematics on the threshold , 2006 .

[32]  Michael Beeson,et al.  Logic and Computation in MATHPERT: An Expert System for Learning Mathematics , 1989, Computers and Mathematics.

[33]  Michael Grove,et al.  STACK: addressing the needs of the "neglected learners" , 2005 .

[34]  A. Arcavi,et al.  DEVELOPING AND USING SYMBOL SENSE IN MATHEMATICS , 2005 .

[35]  Chris DiGiano,et al.  IDEA: Identifying design principles in educational applets , 2005 .