Passive or Active: Understanding Consumers' Behavioral Responses to Online Advertising

Approach and avoidance are two major types of behavioral responses when consumers encounter interferences caused by online advertising. This paper argues that approach-avoidance is not the only dimension from which researchers can examine behavioral responses toward online advertising. The inclusion of the active-passive behaviors dimension enriches the understanding of consumers’ coping strategies. Active and passive behaviors differ from each other by the intensity of coping efforts. Active behavioral responses imply that consumers act upon online ads and make efforts to approach or avoid them. Passive behavioral responses indicate that consumers make little efforts to change the current status, and would rather approach or avoid in a passive way. Data was collected through an online survey by asking participants to recall their experiences with online ads and their behavioral responses. We found that the effects of ad design characteristics (content, form, and behavior) on consumers’ behavioral responses differ across two-dimensions: Approach-Avoidance and Active-Passive. In addition, these effects also vary when consumers have different views (negative vs. positive) of the online ads. The contribution of this study lies in suggesting the two-dimensional view of studying consumers’ responses toward online ads and in deepening our understanding of consumer behavior in dealing with digital artefacts in general.

[1]  S. Folkman,et al.  Stress: Appraisal and Coping , 2020, Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine.

[2]  Jae-Eun Kim,et al.  Human factors in retail environments: a review , 2012 .

[3]  Charles F. Hofacker,et al.  The Influence of Personality on Active and Passive Use of Social Networking Sites , 2011 .

[4]  Gerald Häubl,et al.  Freedom of Choice, Ease of Use, and the Formation of Interface Preferences , 2010, MIS Q..

[5]  Ying Wang,et al.  Examining the role of beliefs and attitudes in online advertising , 2010 .

[6]  Nathan R. Prestopnik,et al.  Coping with Nuisance on the Web , 2010 .

[7]  Jeremy D. Ezell,et al.  Stay or leave: Applying Approach–Avoidance Theory to virtual environments , 2009 .

[8]  Won Jun Lee,et al.  Psychological reactance to online recommendation services , 2009, Inf. Manag..

[9]  Heshan Sun,et al.  Two Types of Attitudes in ICT Acceptance and Use , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[10]  Louisa Ha,et al.  Online Advertising Research in Advertising Journals: A Review , 2008 .

[11]  Ping Zhang,et al.  Web Advertising: What do We Know about its Acceptance and Impacts? - a Meta-Analysis of the literature , 2008, PACIS.

[12]  Andrea Everard,et al.  The effects of online advertising , 2007, Commun. ACM.

[13]  Mariko Morimoto,et al.  Consumers’ Attitudes Toward Unsolicited Commercial E-mail and Postal Direct Mail Marketing Methods , 2006 .

[14]  A. Elliot The Hierarchical Model of Approach-Avoidance Motivation , 2006 .

[15]  R. Lutz,et al.  THE FUNCTION OF FORMAT: Consumer Responses to Six On-line Advertising Formats , 2006 .

[16]  Ping Zhang,et al.  Pop-Up Animations: Impacts and Implications for Website Design and Online Advertising , 2006 .

[17]  Anne Beaudry,et al.  Understanding User Responses to Information Technology: A Coping Model of User Adaption , 2005, MIS Q..

[18]  Lynn Dailey Navigational web atmospherics Explaining the influence of restrictive navigation cues , 2004 .

[19]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Does Animation Attract Online Users' Attention? The Effects of Flash on Information Search Performance and Perceptions , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  Naveen Donthu,et al.  The Impact Of Content And Design Elements On Banner Advertising Click-Through Rates , 2003, Journal of Advertising Research.

[21]  E. Skinner,et al.  Searching for the structure of coping: a review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  Lenita M. Davis,et al.  Empirical testing of a model of online store atmospherics and shopper responses , 2003 .

[23]  Hairong Li,et al.  Forced Exposure and Psychological Reactance: Antecedents and Consequences of the Perceived Intrusiveness of Pop-Up Ads , 2002 .

[24]  Lenita M. Davis,et al.  Atmospheric qualities of online retailing: A conceptual model and implications , 2001 .

[25]  Ping Zhang,et al.  The Effects of Animation on Information Seeking Performance on the World Wide Web: Securing Attention or Interfering with Primary Tasks? , 2000, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Paul A. Bell,et al.  Effects of Environmental Odor and Coping Style on Negative Affect, Anger, Arousal, and Escape1 , 1999 .

[27]  Stevan E. Hobfoll,et al.  Gender and coping: The dual-axis model of coping , 1994, American journal of community psychology.

[28]  Sung-Mook Hong,et al.  A Psychological Reactance Scale: Development, Factor Structure and Reliability , 1989 .

[29]  S Roth,et al.  Approach, avoidance, and coping with stress. , 1986, The American psychologist.

[30]  J. Brehm A theory of psychological reactance. , 1981 .

[31]  J. Brehm,et al.  Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control , 1981 .

[32]  R. A. Wicklund,et al.  Consumer Behavior and Psychological Reactance , 1980 .

[33]  J. Russell,et al.  An approach to environmental psychology , 1974 .