The Oil Drop Experiment: A Rational Reconstruction of the Millikan-Ehrenhaft Controversy and Its Implications for Chemistry Textbooks

Research in science education has recognized the importance of history and philosophy of science. Given this perspective, it is important to analyze how general chemistry textbooks interpret Mil- likan's oil drop experiment. This study has the following objectives: (a) elaboration of a history and phi- losophy of science framework based on a rational reconstruction of experimental observations that led to the Millikan-Ehrenhaft controversy; (b) formulation of six criteria based on the framework, which could be useful in the evaluation of chemistry textbooks; and (c) evaluation of 31 chemistry textbooks based on the criteria. Results obtained showed that most textbooks lacked a history and philosophy of science framework and did not deal adequately with the following aspects. (a) The Millikan-Ehrenhaft contro- versy can open a new window for students, demonstrating how two well-trained scientists can interpret the same set of data in two different ways. (b) Millikan's perseverance with his guiding assumption shows how scientists can overcome difficulties with anomalous data. (c) Millikan's methodology illustrates what modern philosophers of science consider important issues of falsification, confirmation, and suspension of disbelief. (d) The experiment is difficult to perform even today, owing to the incidence of a series of variables. (e) Millikan's major contribution consists of discovering the experiment to provide confirma- tion for the elementary electrical charge. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Res Sci Teach, 37: 480-508, 2000.

[1]  I. Lakatos.  Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1976 .

[2]  J. Thomson.  LVII.On the charge of electricity carried by the ions produced by Röntgen rays , 1898 .

[3]  Mansoor Niaz,et al.  Baroque Tower on a Gothic Base: A Lakatosian Reconstruction of Students' and Teachers' Understanding of Structure of the Atom , 1998 .

[4]  R. Millikan.  The Existence of a Subelectron , 1916 .

[5]  M. R. Matthews.  Science teaching : the role of history and philosophy of science , 1994 .

[6]  Sydney B. Newell.  Chemistry: An introduction , 1980 .

[7]  CHEMICAL PRINCIPLES , 1921 .

[8]  T. Kuhn.  The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. , 1996 .

[9]  The Electron: Its Isolation and Measurement and the Determination of Some of its Properties , 1918, Nature.

[10]  P. Lugol.  Annalen der Physik , 1906 .

[11]  L. Laudan,et al.  Scrutinizing Science: Empirical Studies of Scientific Change , 1992 .

[12]  Gerald Holton,et al.  Subelectrons, Presuppositions, and the Millikan-Ehrenhaft Dispute , 1978 .

[13]  Joel H. Hildebrand,et al.  Principles of Chemistry , 1965 .

[14]  E. Board,et al.  CATHODE RAYS , 1966 .

[15]  J. J. Thomson,et al.  XL. Cathode Rays , 1897 .

[16]  L. Rosenfeld,et al.  Theory of electrons , 1951 .

[17]  William F. McComas,et al.  The Nature of Science in Science Education , 2002 .

[18]  Robert A. Millikan,et al.  A new modification of the cloud method of measuring the elementary electrical charge, and the most probable value of that charge , 1910 .

[19]  E. B. Wilson,et al.  The Theory of Electrons , 1911 .

[20]  J. Kennedy,et al.  Chemistry: principles and applications , 1973 .

[21]  R. V. Young,et al.  World of chemistry , 2000 .

[22]  Nicholas C. Burbules,et al.  Science education and philosophy of science: congruence or contradiction? , 1991 .

[23]  R. Dresdner,et al.  Chemistry: A Systematic Approach , 1980 .

[24]  Michael Shortland,et al.  The advancement of science, and its burdens , 1988 .

[25]  Bas C. van Fraassen,et al.  The Scientific Image , 1980 .

[26]  J. Thomson,et al.  Philosophical Magazine , 1945, Nature.

[27]  William Charnock,et al.  The apparent activation energy for serrated yielding , 1969 .

[28]  Robert A. Millikan.  The Autobiography of Robert A. Millikan , 1950 .

[29]  M. Chiarelli,et al.  General Chemistry , 2019, Basic Chemical Concepts and Tables.

[30]  H. Wilson.  XLII. A determination of the charge on the ions produced in air by Röntgen rays , 1903 .

[31]  Ronald G. Gillespie.  Commentary: Reforming the General Chemistry Textbook , 1997 .

[32]  Morris Hein,et al.  Foundations of College Chemistry , 1970 .

[33]  Dorothy L. Gabel,et al.  Chemistry: The Study of Matter , 1982 .

[34]  F. H. Verhoek,et al.  Chemistry: A study of matter , 1977 .

[35]  R. Millikan,et al.  A first course in physics for colleges , 1928 .

[36]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[37]  Physical Review , 1965, Nature.

[38]  Toby F. Block,et al.  Chemistry Science of Change , 1993 .

[39]  L. Huxley.  Electrons (+ and −), Protons, Photons, Neutrons, Mesotrons and Cosmic Rays , 1948, Nature.

[40]  Mansoor Niaz,et al.  A rational reconstruction of the kinetic molecular theory of gases based on history and philosophy of science and its implications for chemistry textbooks , 2000 .

[41]  E. Rutherford,et al.  The Charge and Nature of the $ \alpha $-Particle , 1908 .

[42]  Gerald Holton,et al.  Einstein, History, And Other Passions , 1995 .

[43]  RAFAEL BLANCO,et al.  Epistemological beliefs of students and teachers about the nature of science: from ‘baconian inductive ascent’ to the ‘irrelevance’ of scientific laws , 1997 .

[44]  Theodore L. Brown.  Chemistry: The Central Science , 1981 .

[45]  Joseph J. Schwab.  The Teaching of Science as Inquiry , 1958 .

[46]  M. Silverman.  Raising questions: Philosophical significance of controversy in science , 1992 .

[47]  K. Popper,et al.  Conjectures and refutations;: The growth of scientific knowledge , 1972 .

[48]  Larry Laudan,et al.  Testing Theories of Scientific Change , 1988 .

[49]  Robert A. Millikan,et al.  The Isolation of an Ion, a Precision Measurement of its Charge, and the Correction of Stokes's Law , 1911 .

[50]  Mansoor Niaz.  From cathode rays to alpha particles to quantum of action: A rational reconstruction of structure of the atom and its implications for chemistry textbooks , 1998 .

[51]  Particles and Waves: Historical Essays in the Philosophy of Science , 1991 .

[52]  K. Popper,et al.  Conjectures and refutations;: The growth of scientific knowledge , 1972 .

[53]  Arnold B. Arons,et al.  A Guide to Introductory Physics Teaching , 1990 .

[54]  Max Iklé,et al.  Über die elektrische Elmentarladung und die Avogadrosche Konstante = On the elementary electrical charge and the Avogadro Constant , 1913 .

[55]  Ernest Nagel,et al.  The Structure of Science , 1962 .

[56]  M. Munowitz,et al.  Principles of Chemistry , 1999, Nature.

[57]  I. Lakatos,et al.  Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1970 .

[58]  Larry Laudan,et al.  Beyond Positivism And Relativism , 1996 .

[59]  Mansoor Niaz.  Enhancing thinking skills: Domain specific/ domain general strategies , 1994 .

[60]  Michael P. Clough,et al.  The Nature of Science in Science Education: An Introduction , 1998 .

[61]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  PLACING THE HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE ON THE CURRICULUM : A MODEL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF PEDAGOGY , 1997 .