LOW-Al TOURMALINES OF THE SCHORL–DRAVITE – POVONDRAITE SERIES IN REDEPOSITED TOURMALINITES FROM THE WESTERN CARPATHIANS, SLOVAKIA

Tourmalines of the schorl–dravite – povondraite series were studied in three samples of tourmalinite pebbles from Lower Triassic Lužna Formation in the Tatric Unit (Bratislava, Devinska Kobyla hill) and the Upper Cretaceous Upohlav conglomerates of the Pieniny Klippen Belt (Orlove), in the western Carpathians, Slovakia. A combination of analytical techniques was used to analyze for major elements (electron microprobe), Fe 3+ and Fe 2+ (Mossbauer spectroscopy). The tourmaline-group minerals studied belong to the schorl–dravite subgroup; they attain the composition of povondraite by virtue of an obvious dravite–schorl – povondraite trend, partially overlapped by a schorl – feruvite trend. A significant amount of Fe 3+ in the tourmaline was determined directly by Mossbauer spectroscopy (at least 59.1% of iron is Fe 3+ ) and indirectly by the cation charge-deficiency (Fe 3+ up to 3.7 apfu ). The Al 3+ content is less than 5.0 apfu , locally reaching below 3.0 (2.86) apfu in sample TQ6. A decreasing Al 3+ content can be charge-balanced by two different mechanisms of substitution: (1) feruvite–uvite substitution [CaMg(NaAl) −1 ], and (2) povondraite substitution (Fe 3+ Al −1 ). The feruvite–uvite substitution saturates the X site with Ca 2+ and the octahedral sites with Mg 2+ to balance Al 3+ below 6.0 apfu . Subsequent decreases in Al content below 5.0 apfu cannot be compensated by the input of divalent cations, but by Fe 3+ using a povondraite substitution. Enlargement of the tourmaline structure in Al-poor povondraitic tourmaline due to Fe 3+ Al −1 substitution allows introduction of K into the X site (up to 0.03 apfu ). The genetic environment of the tourmalines studied remains obscure, but their high Fe 3+ contents and K-enrichment suggest highly oxidized conditions in association with evaporitic processes.

[1]  L. Reznitskii,et al.  Crystal chemistry of the dravite-chromdravite series , 2004 .

[2]  V. Žáček,et al.  Tourmalines of the povondraite - (oxy)dravite series from the cap rock of meta-evaporite in Alto Chapare, Cochabamba, Bolivia , 2000 .

[3]  D. Henry,et al.  Sector-zoned tourmaline from the cap rock of a salt dome , 1999 .

[4]  Frank C. Hawthorne,et al.  Classification of the minerals of the tourmaline group , 1999 .

[5]  M. Dyar,et al.  Inclusive chemical characterization of tourmaline: Mössbauer study of Fe valence and site occupancy , 1998 .

[6]  V. Žáček,et al.  Chemistry and origin of povondraite-bearing rocks from Alto Chapare, Cochabamba, Bolivia , 1998 .

[7]  A. Pieczka,et al.  Mossbauer spectra of Fe3+-poor schorls: reinterpretation on the basis of the ordered structure model , 1998 .

[8]  R. Frietsch,et al.  Early proterozoic Cu(Au) and Fe ore deposits associated with regional NaCl metasomatism in northern Fennoscandia , 1997 .

[9]  J. Grice,et al.  Povondraite, a redefinition of the tourmaline ferridravite , 1993 .

[10]  G. Cavarretta,et al.  Schorl-dravite-ferridravite tourmalines deposited by hydrothermal magmatic fluids during early evolution of the Larderello geothermal field, Italy , 1990 .

[11]  Barbara L. Dutrow,et al.  Ca substitution in Li-poor aluminous tourmaline , 1990 .

[12]  Franklin F. Foit Crystal chemistry of alkali-deficient schorl and tourmaline structural relationships , 1989 .

[13]  R. Gunawardane,et al.  Mössbauer effect study on the mixed valence state of iron in tourmaline , 1988, Mineralogical Magazine.

[14]  D. Henry,et al.  Tourmaline as a petrogenetic indicator mineral - An example from the staurolite-grade metapelites of NW Maine , 1985 .

[15]  P. Dunn,et al.  Ferridravite, a new mineral of the tourmaline group from Bolivia , 1979 .

[16]  P. E. Rosenberg,et al.  Coupled substitutions in the tourmaline group , 1977 .

[17]  S. Fortier,et al.  Schorl refinement showing composition dependence of the tourmaline structure , 1975 .