Stiffness Characteristics of High-Speed Railway Turnout and the Effect on the Dynamic Train-Turnout Interaction

Track stiffness in railway turnouts is variable due to differences in structural composition along the longitudinal direction, which will lead to severe dynamic interaction between train and turnout. In this paper, a transient analysis model is presented to investigate the stiffness characteristics of high-speed railway turnouts based on the finite element method and is applied to optimise the stiffness of railway turnouts. Furthermore, the effect of the stiffness variations on the dynamic train-turnout interaction is analysed. The calculation results show that the track stiffness characteristics are similar in the main and diverging line of railway turnout, except for the check rail sections. Due to the existence of shared baseplates and spacer blocks between different rails, the stiffness variations in the crossing panel are most severe in high-speed railway turnouts. The stiffness differences (calculated as the ratio of the maximum and minimum stiffness) of the longitudinal and lateral direction for Chinese number 18 ballasted turnout are 216% and 229%, respectively. The graded stiffness of the tie pads has been redesigned to optimise the stiffness of railway turnout based on the transient analysis model and the stiffness differences of the turnout are decreased. Altogether, the dynamic train-turnout interaction is enhanced remarkably by considering the turnout’s stiffness characteristics.

[1]  Kevin Barraclough,et al.  I and i , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  Elias Kassa,et al.  Simulation of train–turnout interaction and plastic deformation of rail profiles , 2006 .

[3]  Jens C. O. Nielsen,et al.  Simulation of dynamic interaction between train and railway turnout , 2006 .

[4]  Xiaohong Zhu,et al.  Cloud point extraction for speciation analysis of inorganic tin in water samples by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry , 2006 .

[5]  J Y Zhu.  On the effect of varying stiffness under the switch rail on the wheel—rail dynamic characteristics of a high-speed turnout , 2006 .

[6]  Michel Sebes,et al.  Application of a semi-Hertzian method to the simulation of vehicles in high-speed switches , 2006 .

[7]  Stefano Bruni,et al.  Effects of train impacts on urban turnouts: Modelling and validation through measurements , 2009 .

[8]  Stefano Bruni,et al.  Mathematical modelling of train–turnout interaction , 2009 .

[9]  Colin Cole,et al.  The Calculation of Wheel Impact Force Due to the Interaction between Vehicle and a Turnout , 2010 .

[10]  Jianyue Zhu,et al.  Characterization of forces, dynamic response, and sound radiation from an articulated switch sleeper in a turnout system , 2010 .

[11]  V. Markine,et al.  Combatting RCF on switch points by tuning elastic track properties , 2011 .

[12]  J. N. Varandas,et al.  Dynamic behaviour of railway tracks on transitions zones , 2011 .

[13]  W. Marsden.  I and J , 2012 .

[14]  Jens C. O. Nielsen,et al.  Track gauge optimisation of railway switches using a genetic algorithm , 2012 .

[15]  Asier Alonso,et al.  Rail vehicle passing through a turnout: analysis of different turnout designs and wheel profiles , 2012 .

[16]  Xin Li,et al.  Simulation of track settlement in railway turnouts , 2014 .

[17]  D. Connolly,et al.  Study of railway track stiffness modification by polyurethane reinforcement of the ballast , 2014 .

[18]  I. Y. Shevtsov,et al.  Analysis of train/turnout vertical interaction using a fast numerical model and validation of that model , 2014 .

[19]  Rolf Dollevoet,et al.  An investigation into the modeling of railway fastening , 2015 .

[20]  Georges Kouroussis,et al.  The effect of railway local irregularities on ground vibration , 2015 .

[21]  Georges Kouroussis,et al.  Railway ground vibrations induced by wheel and rail singular defects , 2015 .

[22]  Jens C. O. Nielsen,et al.  Dynamic vehicle–track interaction in switches and crossings and the influence of rail pad stiffness – field measurements and validation of a simulation model , 2015 .

[23]  Geert Lombaert,et al.  A hybrid model for prediction of ground-borne vibration due to discrete wheel/rail irregularities , 2015 .

[24]  Georges Kouroussis,et al.  Modelling the Environmental Effects of Railway Vibrations from Different Types of Rolling Stock: A Numerical Study , 2015 .

[25]  Rong Chen,et al.  Overview and outlook on railway track stiffness measurement , 2016 .

[26]  L. Fradet,et al.  Geometrical variations in white and gray matter affect the biomechanics of spinal cord injuries more than the arachnoid space , 2016 .

[27]  Ping Wang,et al.  Comparison of calculation methods for wheel–switch rail normal and tangential contact , 2017 .

[28]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.