Identifying Subclinical Hearing Loss: Extended Audiometry and Word Recognition in Noise

Introduction: Normal-hearing people often have complaints about the ability to recognize speech in noise. Such disabilities are not typically assessed with conventional audiometry. Suprathreshold temporal deficits might contribute to reduced word recognition in noise as well as reduced temporally based binaural release of masking for speech. Extended high-frequency audibility (>8 kHz) has also been shown to contribute to speech perception in noise. The primary aim of this study was to compare conventional audiometric measures with measures that could reveal subclinical deficits. Methods: Conventional and extended high-frequency audiometry was done with 119 normal-hearing people ranging in age from 18 to 72. The ability to recognize words in noise was evaluated with and without differences in temporally based spatial cues. A low-uncertainty, closed-set word recognition task was used to limit cognitive influences. Results: In normal-hearing listeners, word recognition in noise ability decreases significantly with increasing pure-tone average (PTA). On average, signal-to-noise ratios worsened by 5.7 and 6.0 dB over the normal range, for the diotic and dichotic conditions, respectively. When controlling for age, a significant relationship remained in the diotic condition. Measurement error was estimated at 1.4 and 1.6 dB for the diotic and dichotic conditions, respectively. Controlling for both PTA and age, EHF-PTAs showed significant partial correlations with SNR50 in both conditions (ρ = 0.30 and 0.23). Temporally based binaural release of masking worsened with age by 1.94 dB from 18 to 72 years old but showed no significant relationship with either PTA. Conclusions: All three assessments in this study demonstrated hearing problems independently of those observed in conventional audiometry. Considerable degradations in word recognition in noise abilities were observed as PTAs increased within the normal range. The use of an efficient words-in-noise measure might help identify functional hearing problems for individuals that are traditionally normal hearing. Extended audiometry provided additional predictive power for word recognition in noise independent of both the PTA and age. Temporally based binaural release of masking for word recognition decreased with age independent of PTAs within the normal range, indicating multiple mechanisms of age-related decline with potential clinical impact.

[1]  J. Wouters,et al.  The digit triplet test: a scoping review , 2021, International journal of audiology.

[2]  Lina Motlagh Zadeh,et al.  Extended high frequency hearing and speech perception implications in adults and children , 2020, Hearing Research.

[3]  Sharon G. Kujawa,et al.  Noise-induced Cochlear Synaptopathy with and Without Sensory Cell Loss , 2019, Neuroscience.

[4]  D. Moore,et al.  Extended high-frequency hearing enhances speech perception in noise , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  M. Liberman,et al.  Primary Neural Degeneration in the Human Cochlea: Evidence for Hidden Hearing Loss in the Aging Ear , 2019, Neuroscience.

[6]  C. Trahiotis,et al.  No more than "slight" hearing loss and degradations in binaural processing. , 2019, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Deanna K Meinke,et al.  Conventional audiometry, extended high-frequency audiometry, and DPOAEs in youth recreational firearm users , 2019, International journal of audiology.

[8]  Erol J. Ozmeral,et al.  How aging impacts the encoding of binaural cues and the perception of auditory space , 2018, Hearing Research.

[9]  B. Moore,et al.  The Association Between the Processing of Binaural Temporal-Fine-Structure Information and Audiometric Threshold and Age: A Meta-Analysis , 2018, Trends in hearing.

[10]  D. Eddins,et al.  Cortical Correlates of Binaural Temporal Processing Deficits in Older Adults , 2017, Ear and hearing.

[11]  Jane A. Burton,et al.  Noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) , 2017, Hearing Research.

[12]  Poornima Kumar,et al.  Extended high frequency audiometry in users of personal listening devices. , 2017, American journal of otolaryngology.

[13]  Frederick J. Gallun,et al.  The role of interaural differences on speech intelligibility in complex multi-talker environments. , 2017, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Frederick J. Gallun,et al.  Release from masking for small spatial separations: Effects of age and hearing loss. , 2016, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  J. Wouters,et al.  Speech-in-noise testing as a marker for noise-induced hearing loss and tinnitus. , 2016, B-ENT.

[16]  M. Liberman,et al.  Synaptopathy in the noise-exposed and aging cochlea: Primary neural degeneration in acquired sensorineural hearing loss , 2015, Hearing Research.

[17]  Leslie D. Liberman,et al.  Cochlear neuropathy in human presbycusis: Confocal analysis of hidden hearing loss in post-mortem tissue , 2015, Hearing Research.

[18]  Sunil Puria,et al.  Extended High-Frequency Bandwidth Improves Speech Reception in the Presence of Spatially Separated Masking Speech , 2015, Ear and hearing.

[19]  Ruby Husain,et al.  Hearing Risk among Young Personal Listening Device Users: Effects at High-Frequency and Extended High-Frequency Audiogram Thresholds. , 2015, The journal of international advanced otology.

[20]  Hari M. Bharadwaj,et al.  Individual Differences Reveal Correlates of Hidden Hearing Deficits , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  S. Maso,et al.  High-frequency hearing thresholds: effects of age, occupational ultrasound and noise exposure , 2015, International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health.

[22]  D. Šuta,et al.  Reference hearing thresholds in an extended frequency range as a function of age. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Christopher J. Plack,et al.  Perceptual Consequences of “Hidden” Hearing Loss , 2014, Trends in hearing.

[24]  A. Rodríguez Valiente,et al.  Extended high-frequency (9–20 kHz) audiometry reference thresholds in 645 healthy subjects , 2014, International journal of audiology.

[25]  Hari M. Bharadwaj,et al.  Cochlear neuropathy and the coding of supra-threshold sound , 2014, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[26]  Frederick J. Gallun,et al.  Independent impacts of age and hearing loss on spatial release in a complex auditory environment , 2013, Front. Neurosci..

[27]  M. Liberman,et al.  Noise-induced cochlear neuropathy is selective for fibers with low spontaneous rates. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  Rik J. Otte,et al.  Age-related Hearing Loss and Ear Morphology Affect Vertical but not Horizontal Sound-Localization Performance , 2013, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[29]  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Normal hearing is not enough to guarantee robust encoding of suprathreshold features important in everyday communication , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  M. Liberman,et al.  Primary Neural Degeneration in the Guinea Pig Cochlea After Reversible Noise-Induced Threshold Shift , 2011, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[31]  Beverly A Wright,et al.  Auditory filter shapes and high-frequency hearing in adults who have impaired speech in noise performance despite clinically normal audiograms. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  M. Liberman,et al.  Adding Insult to Injury: Cochlear Nerve Degeneration after “Temporary” Noise-Induced Hearing Loss , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  Gerald Kidd,et al.  The effects of hearing loss and age on the benefit of spatial separation between multiple talkers in reverberant rooms. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  Jong Ho Won,et al.  Spectral-Ripple Resolution Correlates with Speech Reception in Noise in Cochlear Implant Users , 2007, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[35]  K. Knight,et al.  Early changes in auditory function as a result of platinum chemotherapy: use of extended high-frequency audiometry and evoked distortion product otoacoustic emissions. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[36]  Tammo Houtgast,et al.  Recognition of digits in different types of noise by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners , 2007, International journal of audiology.

[37]  Judy R Dubno,et al.  Longitudinal Study of Pure-Tone Thresholds in Older Persons , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[38]  M. Killion,et al.  Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  Jacek Smurzynski,et al.  Test-Retest Reliability of Pure-Tone Thresholds from 0.5 to 16 kHz using Sennheiser HDA 200 and Etymotic Research ER-2 Earphones , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[40]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  Tammo Houtgast,et al.  Development and validation of an automatic speech-in-noise screening test by telephone , 2004, International journal of audiology.

[42]  M. Hildesheimer,et al.  Mapping lateralization of click trains in younger and older populations , 2002, Hearing Research.

[43]  Y. Li,et al.  [Application of extended high frequency audiometry in the early diagnosis of noise--induced hearing loss]. , 2000, Zhonghua er bi yan hou ke za zhi.

[44]  W. T. Nelson,et al.  A speech corpus for multitalker communications research. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  R. Klein,et al.  Aging and high-frequency hearing sensitivity. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[46]  B. Schneider,et al.  Masking-level differences in older adults: The effect of the level of the masking noise , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[47]  J. Mills,et al.  Extended high-frequency thresholds in older adults. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[48]  D M Green,et al.  Reliability of pure-tone thresholds at high frequencies. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  R H Wilson,et al.  High‐Frequency Audiometric Monitoring Strategies for Early Detection of Ototoxicity , 1994, Ear and hearing.

[50]  J. C. Middlebrooks Narrow-band sound localization related to external ear acoustics. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[51]  R. Peters,et al.  Masking level differences for tones and speech in elderly listeners with relatively normal audiograms. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[52]  B A Schneider,et al.  The effect of interaural delay of the masker on masking-level differences in young and old adults. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[53]  D. M. Green,et al.  Sound localization by human listeners. , 1991, Annual review of psychology.

[54]  P G Stelmachowicz,et al.  Normative thresholds in the 8- to 20-kHz range as a function of age. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[55]  R Plomp,et al.  The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[56]  J. Dubno,et al.  Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[57]  S. Holm A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[58]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.