The interaction of inter-turn silence with prosodic cues in listener perceptions of "trouble" in conversation

The forms, functions, and organization of sounds and utterances are generally the focus of speech communication research; little is known, however, about how the silence between speaker turns shades the meaning of the surrounding talk. We use an experimental protocol to test whether listeners’ perception of trouble in interaction (e.g., disagreement or unwillingness) varies when prosodic cues are manipulated in the context of 2 speech acts (requests and assessments). The prosodic cues investigated were inter-turn silence and the duration, absolute pitch, and pitch contour of affirmative response tokens (‘‘yeah’’ and ‘‘sure’’) that followed the inter-turn silence. Study participants evaluated spoken dialogues simulating telephone calls between friends in which the length of silence following a request/assessment (i.e., the inter-turn silence) was manipulated in Praat as were prosodic features of the responses. Results indicate that with each incremental increase in pause duration (0–600–1200 ms) listeners perceived increasingly less willingness to comply with requests and increasingly weaker agreement with assessments. Inter-turn silence and duration of response token proved to be stronger cues to unwillingness and disagreement than did the response token’s pitch characteristics. However, listeners tend to perceive response token duration as a cue to ‘‘trouble’’ when inter-turn silence cues were, apparently, ambiguous (less than 1 s). � 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  Neil Salkind,et al.  Using SPSS for Windows: Analyzing and Understanding Data with Disk , 1997 .

[2]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[3]  Julia Hirschberg,et al.  Communication and prosody: Functional aspects of prosody , 2002, Speech Commun..

[4]  A. B.,et al.  SPEECH COMMUNICATION , 2001 .

[5]  J. Hart,et al.  Memory and the feeling-of-knowing experience. , 1965, Journal of educational psychology.

[6]  H. H. Clark,et al.  On the Course of Answering Questions , 1993 .

[7]  G. Psathas Everyday language : studies in ethnomethodology , 1981 .

[8]  Judy Davidson Structures of Social Action: Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection , 1985 .

[9]  G. Jefferson Preliminary notes on a possible metric which provides for a 'standard maximum' silence of approximately one second in conversation. , 1989 .

[10]  Yasuhiro Katagiri,et al.  Informational and dialogue-coordinating functions of prosodic features of Japanese echoic responses , 2002, Speech Commun..

[11]  T. O. Nelson Metacognition : core readings , 1992 .

[12]  Peter Bull,et al.  Conversation : an interdisciplinary perspective , 1989 .

[13]  木村 和夫 Pragmatics , 1997, Language Teaching.

[14]  Elmar Nöth,et al.  How to find trouble in communication , 2003, Speech Commun..

[15]  Julia Hirschberg,et al.  The Influence of Pitch Range, Duration, Amplitude and Spectral Features on the Interpretation of the Rise-Fall-Rise Intonation Contour in English , 1992 .

[16]  M. Selting Prosody in conversation: Prosody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation: the case of so-called ‘astonished’ questions in repair initiation , 1996 .

[17]  John J. Gumperz,et al.  Discourse strategies: Prosody in conversation , 1982 .

[18]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[19]  M. Swerts,et al.  Audiovisual prosody and feeling of knowing , 2005 .

[20]  D. Zimmerman,et al.  The structure of silence between turns in two‐party conversation , 1986 .

[21]  Jeffrey D. Robinson,et al.  Interobserver Agreement on First-Stage Conversation Analytic Transcription , 2004 .

[22]  Emiel Krahmer,et al.  The dual of denial: Two uses of disconfirmations in dialogue and their prosodic correlates , 2002, Speech Commun..

[23]  B. Repp Phonetic trading relations and context effects: new experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception. , 1982, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  S. Brennan,et al.  THE FEELING OF ANOTHER'S KNOWING : PROSODY AND FILLED PAUSES AS CUES TO LISTENERS ABOUT THE METACOGNITIVE STATES OF SPEAKERS , 1995 .

[25]  P. Andersen Nonverbal Communication: Forms and Functions , 1998 .

[26]  M. McCloskey,et al.  Decisions about Ignorance: Knowing That You Don't Know. , 1981 .

[27]  J. M. Atkinson Structures of Social Action: Contents , 1985 .

[28]  J. Holmes,et al.  The handbook of language and gender , 2003 .

[29]  Anita M. Pomerantz Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes , 1984 .

[30]  P. Boersma ACCURATE SHORT-TERM ANALYSIS OF THE FUNDAMENTAL FREQUENCY AND THE HARMONICS-TO-NOISE RATIO OF A SAMPLED SOUND , 1993 .

[31]  Douglas D. O'Shaughnessy,et al.  Interacting with computers by voice: automatic speech recognition and synthesis , 2003, Proc. IEEE.