The complex search process of invention

We inductively develop a process model of individual search in the context of technological invention, an important aspect of economic development that is also fundamental to the success of many organizations. Using an extensive archival content analysis of notable inventors we find that the search and discovery process of invention is inherently complex, non-linear, and disjointed. Successful inventors are skilled at managing these complex systems, receptive to feedback, and able to revisit and change course. Our search model includes a stimulus, net casting for information, categorizing that information, linking unrelated ideas, and discovery. Our findings articulate the search process as a complex progression through a series of simple stages. As such, the study contributes to our understanding of complexity and the complex systems view of the invention process.

[1]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  The World is Not Small for Everyone: Inequity in Searching for Knowledge in Organizations , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[2]  Steven A. Lippman,et al.  The Economics of Job Search: A Survey: Part I , 1976 .

[3]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .

[4]  Jennifer F. Reinganum.  Strategic Search Theory , 1982 .

[5]  S. Lippman,et al.  THE ECONOMICS OF JOB SEARCH: A SURVEY* , 1976 .

[6]  R. Katila,et al.  Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction , 2002 .

[7]  Tobias Kötter,et al.  Supporting Creativity: Towards Associative Discovery of New Insights , 2008, PAKDD.

[8]  R. Baron.  The cognitive perspective: a valuable tool for answering entrepreneurship's basic “why” questions , 2004 .

[9]  C. Bernard.  Medical Classic. (Book Reviews: An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine) , 1957 .

[10]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  Handbook of Entrepreneurship , 2001 .

[11]  K. Brown.  Inventors at work , 1988 .

[12]  H. Simon,et al.  Organizations, 2nd ed. , 1993 .

[13]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  Innovations as Catalysts for Organizational Change: Shifts in Organizational Cognition and Search , 2000 .

[14]  M. Lorenzen.  Creativity in context : Content, cost, chance and collection in the organization of the film industry , 2009 .

[15]  Kira Fabrizio.  Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation , 2009 .

[16]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[17]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  H. Greve.  A Behavioral Theory of R&D Expenditures and Innovations: Evidence from Shipbuilding , 2003 .

[19]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .

[20]  Don E. Kash,et al.  The Complexity Challenge: Technological Innovation for the 21st Century , 1999 .

[21]  G. Wallas.  The art of thought , 1926 .

[22]  Riitta Katila,et al.  Effects of Search Timing on Product Innovation: The Value of Not Being in Sync , 2009 .

[23]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[24]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Optimal Structure, Market Dynamism, and the Strategy of Simple Rules , 2009 .

[25]  Riitta Katila,et al.  Life in the Fast Lane: Origins of Competitive Interaction in New vs. Established Markets , 2009 .

[26]  Elizabeth Cowley,et al.  The Moderating Effect of Product Knowledge on the Learning and Organization of Product Information , 2003 .

[27]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[28]  H. Miller.  Consumer Search and Retail Analysis , 1993 .

[29]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  A model of adaptive organizational search , 1981 .

[30]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[31]  W. Brian Arthur,et al.  The Nature of Technology: What it Is and How it Evolves , 2009 .

[32]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Opportunity Spaces in Innovation: Empirical Analysis of Large Samples of Ideas , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[33]  R. Katila,et al.  Effects of Search Timing on Innovation: The Value of Not Being in Sync with Rivals , 2008 .

[34]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Categorization theory and research in consumer psychology: category representation and category-based inference , 2008 .

[35]  M. Uhl‐Bien,et al.  Complexity Leadership in Bureaucratic Forms of Organizing: A Meso Model , 2009 .

[36]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Social cognition, 2nd ed. , 1991 .

[37]  Vibha Gaba,et al.  Organizing Far from Equilibrium: Nonlinear Change in Organizational Fields , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[38]  S. Rangan.  The Problem of Search and Deliberation in Economic Action: When Social Networks Really Matter , 2000 .

[39]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  WHO'S BUILDING ON WHOM? OVERCOMING LOCALIZATION BIASES THROUGH ALLIANCES AND MOBILITY. , 2001 .

[40]  Curtis M. Grimm,et al.  The Red Queen Effect: Competitive Actions And Firm Performance , 2008 .

[41]  A. Koestler.  The Act of Creation , 1964 .

[42]  R. Jensen,et al.  Adoption and diffusion of an innovation of uncertain profitability , 1982 .

[43]  G. Huber.  Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[44]  B. Loken,et al.  Alternative Approaches to Understanding the Determinants of Typicality , 1990 .

[45]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[46]  L. Barsalou.  Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[47]  E. Johnsen.  Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .

[48]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science , 1999, Organization Science.

[49]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Looking Forward and Looking Backward: Cognitive and Experiential Search , 2000 .

[50]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Patterned Interactions in Complex Systems , 2007 .

[51]  J. Dewey,et al.  How We Think , 2009 .

[52]  Jing Dong,et al.  Managing Complexity and Unforeseeable Uncertainty in Startup Companies: An Empirical Study , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[53]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Evolutionary trajectories in petroleum firm R&D , 1994 .

[54]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[55]  Sidney G. Winter,et al.  Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological Regimes , 1983 .

[56]  Atul Nerkar,et al.  Evolution of R&D Capabilities: The Role of Knowledge Networks Within a Firm , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[57]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[58]  Charles P. Smith.  Content analysis and narrative analysis. , 2000 .

[59]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention , 1996 .

[60]  Andrew Hargadon,et al.  When Innovations Meet Institutions: Edison and the Design of the Electric Light , 2001 .

[61]  M. Bazerman.  Judgment in Managerial Decision Making , 1990 .

[62]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Patterned Interactions in Complex Systems: Implications for Exploration , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[63]  W A Altemeier,et al.  Information search and decision making in the selection of family health care. , 1989, Journal of health care marketing.

[64]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[65]  L. M. Capella,et al.  An examination of perceived risk, information search and behavioral intentions in search, experience and credence services , 1999 .

[66]  Christen Rose-Anderssen,et al.  New Product Development as a Complex Adaptive System of Decisions , 2006 .

[67]  R. Meyer,et al.  The Effect of Set Composition on Stopping Behavior in a Finite Search Among Assortments , 1997 .

[68]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Relationships and Unethical Behavior: A Social Network Perspective , 1998 .

[69]  Donald A. Schön.  Invention and the Evolution of Ideas , 1969 .

[70]  W. Sofka,et al.  Search patterns and absorptive capacity: Low- and high-technology sectors in European countries , 2009 .

[71]  June E. Downey,et al.  The Psychology of the Inventor. , 1933 .