A Reanalysis of the Hypocentral Location and Related Observations for the Great 1906 California Earthquake

We determine probabilistic hypocentral locations for the foreshock and mainshock of the Great 1906 California earthquake through reanalysis of arrival-time observations in conjunction with modern velocity models and advanced event-location techniques. We obtain two additional observations for the mainshock and one for the foreshock that were not used in previous location studies. Using a robust likelihood function for event location, we generate a usable subset of the predominantly unreliable teleseismic readings and determine new wave-type identifications for some of the local and teleseismic readings. Our locations are much better constrained than those of earlier studies, even though we do not assume that the epicenter lies on the San Andreas fault, as did previous authors. We confirm the conclusions of earlier studies that the local and teleseismic arrival-time observations can be explained by a single foreshock focus and a single mainshock focus on the San Andreas fault, and that there is no single, unique hypocenter that satisfies all available local observations. The maximum-likelihood point (Latitude, 37.78° N; Longitude, 122.51° W) for our “preferred” mainshock location indicates a hypocenter to the west of San Francisco, close to the San Andreas fault zone. This hypocenter has a 68% confidence error of about ±8 km parallel to the San Andreas fault and about ±24 km perpendicular to the fault, and a depth in the midcrust of about 12 ± 7 km. The closest point on the San Andreas fault to this hypocenter lies about 10 km to the northwest of the widely accepted mainshock epicenter of Bolt (1968). Our mainshock location is consistent with the association of initial rupture of the 1906 mainshock with a dilatational right-bend or step-over in the submerged San Andreas fault system offshore of the Golden Gate. Our foreshock location is less well constrained than our mainshock location but is consistent with the foreshock hypocenter being at the same location as the mainshock hypocenter. Online material: Visualization of 3D probabilistic hypocentral locations associated with the 1906 earthquake.

[1]  Thomas J. Owens,et al.  The TauP Toolkit: Flexible Seismic Travel-Time and Raypath Utilities , 1999 .

[2]  E. R. Engdahl,et al.  Constraints on seismic velocities in the Earth from traveltimes , 1995 .

[3]  William Hung Kan Lee,et al.  International handbook of earthquake and engineering seismology , 2002 .

[4]  Harry Fielding Reid,et al.  The California Earthquake of April 18, 1906: Report of the State Earthquake Investigation Commission ... , 2010 .

[5]  John Milne,et al.  Earthquakes and other Earth Movements , 1913, Nature.

[6]  Thomas H. Heaton,et al.  Source study of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake , 1993, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[7]  Peter M. Shearer,et al.  Introduction to Seismology , 2019 .

[8]  Harry Fielding Reid,et al.  The mechanics of the earthquake , 1910 .

[9]  G. Lepage A new algorithm for adaptive multidimensional integration , 1978 .

[10]  M. Zoback,et al.  ANALYSIS OF THE TSUNAMI GENERATED BY THE MW 7.8 1906 SAN FRANCISCO EARTHQUAKE , 1999 .

[11]  P. Somerville,et al.  The influence of critical Moho Reflections on strong ground motions recorded in San Francisco and Oakland during the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake , 1990 .

[12]  D. Wald,et al.  Aftershocks and Triggered Events of the Great 1906 California Earthquake , 2003 .

[13]  T. Moser,et al.  Hypocenter determination in strongly heterogeneous Earth models using the shortest path method , 1992 .

[14]  M. Zoback,et al.  Abrupt along-strike change in tectonic style: San Andreas fault zone , 1999 .

[15]  F. Amelung,et al.  Large-scale tectonic deformation inferred from small earthquakes , 1997, Nature.

[16]  D. Hill Earthquakes and Carbon Dioxide Beneath Mammoth Mountain, California , 1996 .

[17]  C. Thurber,et al.  Advances in seismic event location , 2000 .

[18]  B. Bolt The focus of the 1906 California earthquake , 1968 .

[19]  David M. Boore,et al.  Strong-motion recordings of the California earthquake of April 18, 1906 , 1977 .

[20]  A. Tarantola,et al.  Inverse problems = Quest for information , 1982 .

[21]  H. Kao,et al.  Hypocentre determination offshore of eastern Taiwan using the Maximum Intersection method , 2004 .

[22]  Jean Virieux,et al.  Precise, absolute earthquake location under Somma–Vesuvius volcano using a new three-dimensional velocity model , 2001 .

[23]  Hua-wei Zhou,et al.  Rapid three‐dimensional hypocentral determination using a master station method , 1994 .

[24]  W. Mooney,et al.  Crustal structure of the Diablo and Gabilan Ranges, central California: A reinterpretation of existing data , 1982 .

[25]  Andrew C. Lawson,et al.  The California Earthquake of April 18, 1906 , 1910 .

[26]  C. Lomnitz,et al.  Seismological evidence on the tectonics of central and northern California and the Mendocino escarpment , 1968 .

[27]  P. Shearer,et al.  Global Stacking of Broadband Seismograms , 1996 .

[28]  J. Hammersley,et al.  Monte Carlo Methods , 1965 .

[29]  G. Wittlinger,et al.  Earthquake location in strongly heterogeneous media , 1993 .

[30]  T. Parsons Crustal structure of the coastal and marine San Francisco Bay region, California , 2002 .