Data-driven ion-independent relative biological effectiveness modeling using the beam quality Q

Beam quality Q = Z2/E (Z = ion charge, E = energy), an alternative to the conventionally used linear energy transfer (LET), enables ion-independent modeling of the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of ions. Therefore, the Q concept, i.e. different ions with similar Q have similar RBE values, could help to transfer clinical RBE knowledge from better-studied ion types (e.g. carbon) to other ions. However, the validity of the Q concept has so far only been demonstrated for low LET values. In this work, the Q concept was explored in a broad LET range, including the so-called overkilling region. The particle irradiation data ensemble (PIDE) was used as experimental in vitro dataset. Data-driven models, i.e. neural network (NN) models with low complexity, were built to predict RBE values for H, He, C and Ne ions at different in vitro endpoints taking different combinations of clinically available candidate inputs: LET, Q and linear-quadratic photon parameter α x/β x. Models were compared in terms of prediction power and ion dependence. The optimal model was compared to published model data using the local effect model (LEM IV). The NN models performed best for the prediction of RBE at reference photon doses between 2 and 4 Gy or RBE near 10% cell survival, using only α x/β x and Q instead of LET as input. The Q model was not significantly ion dependent (p > 0.5) and its prediction power was comparable to that of LEM IV. In conclusion, the validity of the Q concept was demonstrated in a clinically relevant LET range including overkilling. A data-driven Q model was proposed and observed to have an RBE prediction power comparable to a mechanistic model regardless of particle type. The Q concept provides the possibility of reducing RBE uncertainty in treatment planning for protons and ions in the future by transferring clinical RBE knowledge between ions.

[1]  A. Lühr,et al.  Increased relative biological effectiveness and periventricular radiosensitivity in proton therapy of glioma patients. , 2022, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  C. Bäumer,et al.  Comparing biological effectiveness guided plan optimization strategies for cranial proton therapy: potential and challenges , 2022, Radiation Oncology.

[3]  J. Haviland,et al.  A systematic review of clinical studies on variable proton Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE). , 2022, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[4]  Liheng Tian,et al.  An ion-independent phenomenological relative biological effectiveness (RBE) model for proton therapy. , 2022, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[5]  B. S. Sørensen,et al.  Clinical use and future requirements of relative biological effectiveness: survey among all european proton therapy centres. , 2022, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  M. Scholz,et al.  Update of the particle irradiation data ensemble (PIDE) for cell survival , 2021, Journal of radiation research.

[7]  T. Shirai,et al.  The Emerging Potential of Multi-Ion Radiotherapy , 2021, Frontiers in Oncology.

[8]  S. McMahon Proton RBE models: commonalities and differences , 2021, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  A. Lühr,et al.  Predicting late magnetic resonance image changes in glioma patients after proton therapy , 2019, Acta oncologica.

[10]  J. Debus,et al.  Biophysical modeling and experimental validation of relative biological effectiveness (RBE) for 4He ion beam therapy , 2019, Radiation oncology.

[11]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Report of the AAPM TG-256 on the relative biological effectiveness of proton beams in radiation therapy. , 2019, Medical physics.

[12]  Johannes A Langendijk,et al.  Radiation dose constraints for organs at risk in neuro-oncology; the European Particle Therapy Network consensus. , 2018, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[13]  C. Karger,et al.  RBE and related modeling in carbon-ion therapy , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  K. Shirai,et al.  Dose-volume histogram analysis of brainstem necrosis in head and neck tumors treated using carbon-ion radiotherapy. , 2017, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  A. Lühr,et al.  Modeling in vivo relative biological effectiveness in particle therapy for clinically relevant endpoints , 2017, Acta oncologica.

[16]  A. Dale,et al.  Regional susceptibility to dose-dependent white matter damage after brain radiotherapy. , 2017, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[17]  K Parodi,et al.  A phenomenological relative biological effectiveness approach for proton therapy based on an improved description of the mixed radiation field , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  Aimee L. McNamara,et al.  A phenomenological relative biological effectiveness (RBE) model for proton therapy based on all published in vitro cell survival data , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  H. Tsujii,et al.  Risk factors for brain injury after carbon ion radiotherapy for skull base tumors. , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[20]  I. Das,et al.  Oxygen Effect, Relative Biological Effectiveness and Linear Energy Transfer , 2014 .

[21]  Bengt K Lind,et al.  A model for the relative biological effectiveness of protons: The tissue specific parameter α/β of photons is a predictor for the sensitivity to LET changes , 2013, Acta oncologica.

[22]  Tadashi Kamada,et al.  Results of carbon ion radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[23]  A. Lühr,et al.  Stopping power for particle therapy: The generic library libdEdx and clinically relevant stopping-power ratios for light ions , 2012, International journal of radiation biology.

[24]  Michael Scholz,et al.  Calculation of the biological effects of ion beams based on the microscopic spatial damage distribution pattern , 2012, International journal of radiation biology.

[25]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[26]  Michael Scholz,et al.  Quantification of the relative biological effectiveness for ion beam radiotherapy: direct experimental comparison of proton and carbon ion beams and a novel approach for treatment planning. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  KOICHI ANDO,et al.  Biological characteristics of carbon-ion therapy , 2009, International journal of radiation biology.

[28]  Michael Scholz,et al.  Biophysical calculation of cell survival probabilities using amorphous track structure models for heavy-ion irradiation , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  B. Jones,et al.  The incorporation of the concept of minimum RBE (RBEmin) into the linear-quadratic model and the potential for improved radiobiological analysis of high-LET treatments , 2007, International journal of radiation biology.

[30]  U. Isacsson,et al.  The influence of RBE variations in a clinical proton treatment plan for a hypopharynx cancer , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  R. Bimbot,et al.  Experimental studies of heavy-ion slowing down in matter , 2002 .

[32]  M. Cavinato,et al.  Relative biological effectiveness of light ions in human tumoural cell lines: role of protein p53. , 2002, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[33]  T. Kanai,et al.  Inactivation of Aerobic and Hypoxic Cells from Three Different Cell Lines by Accelerated 3He-, 12C- and 20Ne-Ion Beams , 2000, Radiation research.

[34]  R. Hawkins A microdosimetric-kinetic theory of the dependence of the RBE for cell death on LET. , 1998, Medical physics.

[35]  M. Scholz,et al.  Computation of cell survival in heavy ion beams for therapy , 1997, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[36]  R. Hawkins,et al.  A microdosimetric-kinetic model of cell death from exposure to ionizing radiation of any LET, with experimental and clinical applications. , 1996, International journal of radiation biology.

[37]  M R Raju,et al.  A heavy particle comparative study. Part IV: acute and late reactions. , 1978, The British journal of radiology.