TUIs vs. GUIs: comparing the learning potential with preschoolers

In an effort to better understand the learning potential of a tangible interface, we conducted a comparison study between a tangible and a traditional graphical user interface for teaching preschoolers (In Portugal, children enter preschool at the age of three and they attend it till entering school, normally at the age of six) about good oral hygiene. The study was carried with two groups of children aged 4 to 5 years. Questionnaires to parents, children’s drawings, and interviews were used for data collection and analysis and revealed important indicators about children’s change of attitude, involvement, and preferences for the interfaces. The questionnaires showed a remarkable change of attitude toward tooth brushing in the children that interacted with the tangible interface; particularly children’s motivation increased significantly. Children’s drawings were used to assess their degree of involvement with the interfaces. The drawings from the children that interacted with the tangible interface were very complete and detailed suggesting that the children felt actively involved with the experience. The results suggest that the tangible interface was capable of promoting a stronger and long-lasting involvement having a greater potential to engage children, therefore potentially promoting learning. Evaluation through drawing seems to be a promising method to work with preliterate children; however, it is advisable to use it together with other methods.

[1]  J. Read,et al.  Endurability, Engagement and Expectations: Measuring Children’s Fun , 2002 .

[2]  Kirsten Risden,et al.  Guidelines for usability testing with children , 1997, INTR.

[3]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[4]  M. Resnick.  Sowing the Seeds for a more Creative Society , 2009, CHI 2009.

[5]  Afke Donker,et al.  Usability testing with young children , 2004, IDC '04.

[6]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[7]  Cristina Sylla,et al.  Storytelling through drawings: evaluating tangible interfaces for children , 2009, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[8]  M. Zurmuehlen,et al.  Creative and mental growth , 1952 .

[9]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Extending tangible interfaces for education: digital montessori-inspired manipulatives , 2005, CHI.

[10]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[11]  J. Piaget.  Play, dreams and imitation in childhood , 1951 .

[12]  Panos Markopoulos,et al.  A comparison of think-aloud, questionnaires and interviews for testing usability with children , 2002 .

[13]  Luc Steels,et al.  A Learning Zone of One's Own: Sharing Representations and Flow in Collaborative Learning Enviroments , 2004 .

[14]  S. Shott,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics , 2018, The Encyclopedia of Archaeological Sciences.

[15]  D. Keats.  Cross-Cultural Studies in Child Development in Asian Contexts , 2000 .

[16]  John Matthews.  Drawing and Painting: Children and Visual Representation , 2003 .

[17]  湯淺 太一,et al.  20世紀の名著名論:Seymour Papert: Mindstorms:Children Computers and Powerful Ideas Basic Books New York 1980 , 2005 .

[18]  Brygg Ullmer,et al.  Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction , 2007 .

[19]  James H. McMillan,et al.  Research in Education: A Conceptual Introduction , 1984 .

[20]  Paul Marshall,et al.  Do tangible interfaces enhance learning? , 2007, TEI.

[21]  Panos Markopoulos,et al.  How to compare usability testing methods with children participants , 2002 .

[22]  Perttu Hämäläinen,et al.  Using peer tutoring in evaluating the usability of a physically interactive computer game with children , 2003, Interact. Comput..

[23]  Janet C. Read,et al.  In search of tangible magic , 2008, BCS HCI.

[24]  W. W. Daniel.  Applied Nonparametric Statistics , 1979 .

[25]  Emanuela Mazzone,et al.  In search for evaluation methods for children's tangible technology , 2006, IDC '06.

[26]  Maria Montessori,et al.  The Montessori method: Scientific pedagogy as applied to child education in "the Children's Houses" , 2012 .

[27]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Digital manipulatives: new toys to think with , 1998, CHI.

[28]  Paul Marshall,et al.  Tangibles for children,: the challenges , 2009, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[29]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms , 1997, CHI.

[30]  Janet C. Read,et al.  Experience it, draw it, rate it: capture children's experiences with their drawings , 2009, IDC.

[31]  Gary W. Moore,et al.  Developing and evaluating educational research , 1983 .

[32]  I. Sigel.  Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. , 1953 .

[33]  I. Lewis,et al.  Acquiring Culture: Cross-cultural Studies in Child Development , 1988 .

[34]  Bieke Zaman,et al.  How to measure the likeability of tangible interaction with preschoolers , 2007 .

[35]  Allison Druin,et al.  Child's play: a comparison of desktop and physical interactive environments , 2005, IDC '05.