Bedside autonomic risk stratification after myocardial infarction by means of short-term deceleration capacity of heart rate.

Aims Twenty-four-hour deceleration capacity (DC24h) of heart rate is a strong predictor of mortality after myocardial infarction (MI). Assessment of DC from short-term recordings (DCst) would be of practical use in everyday clinical practice but its predictive value is unknown. Here, we test the usefulness of DCst for autonomic bedside risk stratification after MI. Methods and results We included 908 patients after acute MI enrolled in Munich and 478 patients with acute (n = 232) and chronic MI (n = 246) enrolled in Tuebingen, both in Germany. We assessed DCst from high-resolution resting electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings (<30 min) performed under standardized conditions in supine position. In the Munich cohort, we also assessed DC24h from 24-h Holter recordings. Deceleration capacity was dichotomized at the established cut-off value of ≤ 2.5 ms. Primary endpoint was 3-year mortality. Secondary endpoint was 3-year cardiovascular mortality. In addition to DC, multivariable analyses included the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events score >140 and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35%. During follow-up, 48 (5.3%) and 48 (10.0%) patients died in the Munich and Tuebingen cohorts, respectively. On multivariable analyses, DCst ≤ 2.5 ms was the strongest predictor of mortality, yielding hazard ratios of 5.04 (2.68-9.49; P < 0.001) and 3.19 (1.70-6.02; P < 0.001) in the Munich and Tuebingen cohorts, respectively. Deceleration capacity assessed from short-term recordings ≤ 2.5 ms was also an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality in both cohorts. Implementation of DCst ≤ 2.5 ms into the multivariable models led to a significant increase of C-statistics and integrated discrimination improvement score. Conclusion Deceleration capacity assessed from short-term recordings is a strong and independent predictor of mortality and cardiovascular mortality after MI, which is complementary to existing risk stratification strategies.

[1]  J. Miller,et al.  Decreased heart rate variability and its association with increased mortality after acute myocardial infarction. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[2]  R. Prescott,et al.  Prospective study of heart rate variability and mortality in chronic heart failure: results of the United Kingdom heart failure evaluation and assessment of risk trial (UK-heart). , 1998, Circulation.

[3]  Andrea Mazzanti,et al.  2015 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death. , 2016, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[4]  D. Nunan,et al.  A Quantitative Systematic Review of Normal Values for Short‐Term Heart Rate Variability in Healthy Adults , 2010, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[5]  M. Malik,et al.  Phase-rectified signal averaging detects quasi-periodicities in non-stationary data , 2006 .

[6]  A L Goldberger,et al.  Fractal correlation properties of R-R interval dynamics and mortality in patients with depressed left ventricular function after an acute myocardial infarction. , 2000, Circulation.

[7]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Frequency Domain Measures of Heart Period Variability and Mortality After Myocardial Infarction , 1992, Circulation.

[8]  H. Huikuri,et al.  Sudden death due to cardiac arrhythmias. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  M. Malik,et al.  Improved Stratification of Autonomic Regulation for risk prediction in post-infarction patients with preserved left ventricular function (ISAR-Risk) , 2008, European heart journal.

[10]  A. Buxton.  Risk stratification for sudden death: do we need anything more than ejection fraction? , 2003, Cardiac electrophysiology review.

[11]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. , 1996 .

[12]  T. Lehtimäki,et al.  Sympathetic activity-associated periodic repolarization dynamics predict mortality following myocardial infarction. , 2014, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[13]  A. Camm,et al.  Heart-rate turbulence after ventricular premature beats as a predictor of mortality after acute myocardial infarction , 1999, The Lancet.

[14]  M Malik,et al.  Short- and long-term assessment of heart rate variability for risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  M. Malik,et al.  Deceleration capacity of heart rate as a predictor of mortality after myocardial infarction: cohort study , 2006, The Lancet.

[16]  M. Gawaz,et al.  Severe autonomic failure as a predictor of mortality in aortic valve stenosis. , 2014, International journal of cardiology.

[17]  A. Malliani,et al.  Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use , 1996 .

[18]  D. Levy,et al.  Impact of reduced heart rate variability on risk for cardiac events. The Framingham Heart Study. , 1996, Circulation.

[19]  J. Bigger,et al.  Baroreflex sensitivity and heart-rate variability in prediction of total cardiac mortality after myocardial infarction , 1998, The Lancet.

[20]  Wolfgang Hamm,et al.  Autonomic Nervous System Activity as Risk Predictor in the Medical Emergency Department: A Prospective Cohort Study , 2015, Critical care medicine.

[21]  Á. Avezum,et al.  Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events. , 2003, Archives of internal medicine.

[22]  Andrea Mazzanti,et al.  [2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death]. , 2015, Kardiologia polska.