Stimulation of early bone formation by the combination of an osteopromotive membrane technique and hyperbaric oxygen.

Large bone defects often heal incompletely as a result of ingrowth of connective tissue. By using a mechanical hindrance, a porous expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) membrane, it is possible to prevent fibroblasts and other soft connective tissue cells from entering the defect, thereby allowing osteogenesis to occur unhindered. As evidenced in several investigations, this osteopromotive membrane technique causes a strongly improved bone regeneration of well defined osseous lesions. Hyperbaric oxygen treatment has also been shown to accelerate bone healing. In this study the value of combining the two techniques was investigated. Through-and-through bone defects, 5 mm in diameter, were produced unilaterally in the angular region of the mandibles of adult rats (n = 60); the defects in half the number of animals were covered lingually and buccally with membranes. The animals were then divided into four groups: treatment with membrane alone, treatment with hyperbaric oxygen alone, combined treatment, and no treatment. Histological examination of the defects after 14 days showed that the combination of techniques had resulted in significant improvement in bone healing, compared with hyperbaric oxygen or the membrane technique alone. Synergistic effects can thus be achieved by the use of membranes and stimulatory factors for bone regeneration.

[1]  C. Dahlin,et al.  Bone augmentation at fenestrated implants by an osteopromotive membrane technique. A controlled clinical study. , 1991, Clinical oral implants research.

[2]  P. Alberius,et al.  Osteopromotion for cranioplasty. An experimental study in rats using a membrane technique. , 1991, Journal of neurosurgery.

[3]  N. Lang,et al.  Regeneration and enlargement of jaw bone using guided tissue regeneration. , 1990, Clinical oral implants research.

[4]  S Nyman,et al.  Healing of maxillary and mandibular bone defects using a membrane technique. An experimental study in monkeys. , 1990, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.

[5]  P. A. Lucas Chemotactic response of osteoblast-like cells to transforming growth factor beta. , 1989, Bone.

[6]  S. Nyman,et al.  Healing of Bone Defects by Guided Tissue Regeneration , 1988, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  G. Granström,et al.  Effects of dextrans, heparin and hyperbaric oxygen on mandibular tissue damage after osteotomy in an experimental system. , 1987, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[8]  J O Hollinger,et al.  The critical size defect as an experimental model for craniomandibulofacial nonunions. , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  G. H. Weiss,et al.  Cranioplasty: a review of 1030 cases of penetrating head injury. , 1979, Neurosurgery.

[10]  K. Heiple,et al.  A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE HEALING PROCESS FOLLOWING DIFFERENT TYPES OF BONE TRANSPLANTATION. , 1963, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.