A finite element lower extremity and pelvis model for predicting bone injuries due to knee bolster loading

Injuries to the knee-thigh-hip (KTH) complex in frontal motor vehicle crashes are of substantial concern because of their frequency and potential to result in long-term disability. Current frontal impact Anthropometric Test Dummies (ATDs) have been shown to respond differently than human cadavers under frontal knee impact loading and consequently current ATDs (and FE models thereof) may lack the biofidelity needed to predict the incidence of knee, thigh, and hip injuries in frontal crashes. These concerns demand an efficient and biofidelic tool to evaluate the occurrence of injuries as a result of KTH loading in frontal crashes. The MADYMO human finite element (FE) model was therefore adapted to simulate bone deformation, articulating joints and soft tissue behavior in the KTH complex. To validate this model, the knee-femur complex response was compared to results of post-mortem human subject (PMHS) experiments where a distributed load was applied to the knee while the femoral head rested on a fixed acetabular cup. The model was also validated against experimental whole KTH response data, in which the pelvis was fixed at the iliac wings and a distributed load was applied to the knee. These experiments showed that the acetabulum is the weakest structure in typical knee bolster loading, followed by femoral head and femoral shaft. The simulations replicated the experimentally observed force-deflection response and predicted the highest stress at the experimentally observed locations of bony fracture. © 2004 SAE International.

[1]  L. Mockros,et al.  Indentation tests of human articular cartilage. , 1976, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  E. Sedlin,et al.  A rheologic model for cortical bone. A study of the physical properties of human femoral samples. , 1965, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[3]  J. Mcelhaney,et al.  Mechanical properties on cranial bone. , 1970, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Matthew P. Reed,et al.  COMPARISON OF KNEE/FEMUR FORCE-DEFLECTION RESPONSE OF THE THOR, HYBRID III AND HUMAN CADAVER TO DYNAMIC FRONTAL IMPACT KNEE LOADING , 2003 .

[5]  A. Katznelson,et al.  Fractures of the acetabulum. , 1973, The Journal of trauma.

[6]  M Martens,et al.  Aging of bone tissue: mechanical properties. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  S A Ridella,et al.  The development, validation and application of a finite element upper extremity model subjected to air bag loading. , 2003, Stapp car crash journal.

[8]  Benoît Besnault,et al.  A PARAMETRIC FINITE ELEMENT MODEL OF THE HUMAN PELVIS , 1998 .

[9]  S. Robin,et al.  HUMOS: HUMAN MODEL FOR SAFETY - A JOINT EFFORT TOWARDS THE DEVELOPMENT OF REFINED HUMAN-LIKE CAR OCCUPANT MODELS , 2001 .

[10]  W. R. Powell,et al.  Cadaver Femur Responses to Longitudinal Impacts , 1975 .

[11]  J. B. Benson,et al.  IMPACT RESPONSE AND TOLERANCE OF THE LOWER EXTREMITIES , 1975 .

[12]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Development and validation of a three-dimensional finite element model of the pelvic bone. , 1995, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[13]  Matthew P Reed,et al.  The tolerance of the human hip to dynamic knee loading. , 2002, Stapp car crash journal.

[14]  C. Hirsch,et al.  Factors affecting the determination of the physical properties of femoral cortical bone. , 1966, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[15]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  LOWER EXTREMITY INJURIES AND ASSOCIATED INJURY CRITERIA , 2001 .