Understanding Engagement through Search Behaviour

Evaluating user engagement with search is a critical aspect of understanding how to assess and improve information retrieval systems. While standard techniques for measuring user engagement use questionnaires, these are obtrusive to user interaction, and can only be collected at acceptable intervals. The problem we address is whether there is a less obtrusive and more automatic way to assess how users perceive the search process and outcome. Log files collect behavioural signals (e.g., clicks, queries) from users on a large scale. In this paper, we investigate the potential to predict how users perceive engagement with search by modelling behavioural signals from log files using supervised learning methods. We focus on different engagement dimensions (Perceived Usability, Felt Involvement, Endurability and Novelty) and examine how 37 behavioural features can inform these dimensions. Our results, obtained from 377 in-lab participants undergoing goal-based search tasks, support the connection between perceived engagement and search behaviour. More specifically, we show that time- and query-related features are best suited for predicting user perceived engagement, and suggest that different behavioural features better reflect specific dimensions. We demonstrate the possibility of predicting user-perceived engagement using search behavioural features.

[1]  Mounia Lalmas,et al.  Absence time and user engagement: evaluating ranking functions , 2013, WSDM '13.

[2]  Mark Sanderson,et al.  A review of factors influencing user satisfaction in information retrieval , 2010 .

[3]  Tapas Kanungo,et al.  Model characterization curves for federated search using click-logs: predicting user engagement metrics for the span of feasible operating points , 2011, WWW.

[4]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Modeling dwell time to predict click-level satisfaction , 2014, WSDM.

[5]  Elaine Toms,et al.  Is there a universal instrument for measuring interactive information retrieval?: the case of the user engagement scale , 2010, IIiX.

[6]  Mounia Lalmas,et al.  Models of user engagement , 2012, UMAP.

[7]  Elaine Toms,et al.  Examining the generalizability of the User Engagement Scale (UES) in exploratory search , 2013, Inf. Process. Manag..

[8]  Peter Brusilovsky,et al.  User-controllable personalization: A case study with SetFusion , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[9]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Accessing and Browsing Information and Communication , 2001 .

[10]  Falk Scholer,et al.  User performance versus precision measures for simple search tasks , 2006, SIGIR.

[11]  Richard David Jacques,et al.  The nature of engagement and its role in hypermedia evaluation and design , 1996 .

[12]  Elizabeth F. Churchill,et al.  Mouse tracking: measuring and predicting users' experience of web-based content , 2012, CHI.

[13]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Characterizing and predicting search engine switching behavior , 2009, CIKM.

[14]  Elaine Toms,et al.  The Relationship Between User Perception and User Behaviour in Interactive Information Retrieval Evaluation , 2016, ECIR.

[15]  Elaine Toms,et al.  The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[16]  Eugene Agichtein,et al.  Discovering common motifs in cursor movement data for improving web search , 2014, WSDM.

[17]  Yang Song,et al.  Evaluating and predicting user engagement change with degraded search relevance , 2013, WWW.

[18]  Vasudeva Varma,et al.  Timespent based models for predicting user retention , 2013, WWW.

[19]  Jane Webster,et al.  Audience engagement in multimedia presentations , 1997, DATB.

[20]  Luis A. Leiva,et al.  Predicting User Engagement with Direct Displays Using Mouse Cursor Information , 2016, SIGIR.

[21]  Elaine Toms,et al.  WiIRE: the Web interactive information retrieval experimentation system prototype , 2004, Inf. Process. Manag..

[22]  Joemon M. Jose,et al.  User engagement in online News: Under the scope of sentiment, interest, affect, and gaze , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[23]  Steve Fox,et al.  Evaluating implicit measures to improve web search , 2005, TOIS.

[24]  Paul Thomas,et al.  Measuring Engagement with Online Forms , 2016, CHIIR.

[25]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data , 2002, KDD.

[26]  Whitney Quesenbery,et al.  The Five Dimensions of Usability , 2014 .

[27]  George Valkanas,et al.  Understanding Within-Content Engagement through Pattern Analysis of Mouse Gestures , 2014, CIKM.

[28]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges , 2006, NordiCHI '06.

[29]  Mounia Lalmas,et al.  Measuring User Engagement , 2014, Measuring User Engagement.

[30]  Firdaus Banhawi,et al.  Measuring user engagement attributes in social networking application , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Semantic Technology and Information Retrieval.

[31]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Struggling and Success in Web Search , 2015, CIKM.

[32]  Xiaojun Yuan,et al.  Building the trail best traveled: effects of domain knowledge on web search trailblazing , 2012, CHI.

[33]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  The good, the bad, and the random: an eye-tracking study of ad quality in web search , 2010, SIGIR.

[34]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  Wrappers for Feature Subset Selection , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[35]  Brenda Laurel,et al.  Computers as theatre , 1991 .

[36]  Imed Zitouni,et al.  Predicting User Satisfaction with Intelligent Assistants , 2016, SIGIR.

[37]  Gleb Gusev,et al.  Engagement Periodicity in Search Engine Usage: Analysis and its Application to Search Quality Evaluation , 2015, WSDM.

[38]  Elaine Toms,et al.  What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[39]  Diane Kelly,et al.  Methods for Evaluating Interactive Information Retrieval Systems with Users , 2009, Found. Trends Inf. Retr..

[40]  Elaine Toms,et al.  How is a search system used in work task completion? , 2013, J. Inf. Sci..

[41]  James E. Pitkow,et al.  Characterizing Browsing Strategies in the World-Wide Web , 1995, Comput. Networks ISDN Syst..

[42]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Query length in interactive information retrieval , 2003, SIGIR.