Uncertainty propagation in models driven by remotely sensed data

Often, little importance is given to the problem of how uncertainty propagates in models driven by remotely sensed data, and what the effects of uncertainty might be on the output of these models. In this paper, a general procedure to support a characterisation of uncertainty in the generation of remote sensing (RS) products is proposed. The procedure can be used with models characterised by any degree of complexity and driven by any kind of data. It provides two useful tools to analyse models: uncertainty analysis (UA), which allows the assessment of the uncertainty associated with model output, and sensitivity analysis (SA), which is useful to determine how much each source of uncertainty contributes to model output uncertainty. Uncertainty modelling, i.e. finding suitable tools to represent uncertainty, is a key step in performing UA and SA. A general error model for quantitative raster data is described. Different applications of UA and SA are proposed, and, in the last part of the paper, an example of UA and SA on a model for burned area detection is discussed.

[1]  Knudsen.  Estimation and modelling of the local empirical covariance function using gravity and satellite altimeter data , 1987 .

[2]  Edward M. Mikhail,et al.  Observations And Least Squares , 1983 .

[3]  P. A. Cross,et al.  Lecture notes in Earth sciences: Vol. 12. S. Turner (Editor), Applied Geodesy VIII, Springer, Berlin, F.R.G., 1987, 393pp, DM78.00, ISBN 3 540 182195 , 1989 .

[4]  Didier Tanré,et al.  Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum, 6S: an overview , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[5]  C. Fortuin,et al.  Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients. I Theory , 1973 .

[6]  A. Saltelli,et al.  A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output , 1999 .

[7]  S. Kalluri,et al.  The Pathfinder AVHRR land data set: An improved coarse resolution data set for terrestrial monitoring , 1994 .

[8]  B. Pinty,et al.  A physical model of the bidirectional reflectance of vegetation canopies , 1990 .

[9]  J. C. Price,et al.  Timing of NOAA afternoon passes , 1991 .

[10]  R. Dickinson,et al.  A physical model of the bidirectional reflectance of vegetation canopies: 2. Inversion and validation , 1990 .

[11]  Jose M. Cardoso Pereira,et al.  An assessment of vegetation fire in Africa (1981–1991): Burned areas, burned biomass, and atmospheric emissions , 1999 .

[12]  Gerard B. M. Heuvelink,et al.  Error Propagation in Environmental Modelling with GIS , 1998 .

[13]  H. Rahman,et al.  Coupled surface-atmosphere reflectance (CSAR) model: 2. Semiempirical surface model usable with NOAA advanced very high resolution radiometer data , 1993 .

[14]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Development and test of an error model for categorical data , 1992, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[15]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis: tools for GIS-based model implementation , 2001, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[16]  Larry L. Stowe,et al.  Scientific basis and initial evaluation of the CLAVR-1 global clear cloud classification algorithm f , 1999 .

[17]  F. Sansò,et al.  Statistical methods in physical geodesy , 1986 .

[18]  R. Colwell.  Remote sensing of the environment , 1980, Nature.

[19]  H. Moritz.  Advanced Physical Geodesy , 1980 .

[20]  P. Barbosa,et al.  An Algorithm for Extracting Burned Areas from Time Series of AVHRR GAC Data Applied at a Continental Scale , 1999 .

[21]  J. Townshend,et al.  Global land cover classifications at 8 km spatial resolution: The use of training data derived from Landsat imagery in decision tree classifiers , 1998 .