An inertia-capacitance beam substructure formulation based on the bond graph method with application to rotating beams

In this paper, a novel inertia-capacitance (IC) beam substructure formulation based on the IC-field presentation from the bond graph method is developed. The IC beam provides a modular, systematic and graphical approach to beam modeling. These features allow the modeler to focus more on the modeling and less on the mathematics. As such, the IC beam is proposed as an alternative to the many existing types of beam models available in the literature. The IC beam is formulated in the center of mass body fixed coordinate system allowing for easy interfacing in a multibody system setting. This floating frame approach is also computationally cheap. Elastic deformations in the IC beam are assumed to be small and described by modal superposition. The formulation couples rigid body and elastic deformations in a nonlinear fashion. The formulation is also compact and efficient. Detailed derivations for a two-dimensional planar IC beam with bending modes are presented. A modal acceleration method based on the decoupling of bending modes is proposed for use in the IC beam. The rotating beam spin-up maneuver problem is solved. The Karnopp–Margolis method is applied to ensure complete integral causality for an efficient numerical system. Geometric substructuring technique is applied to model large deflections. The IC beam is shown to be capable of solving the rotating beam problem accurately and efficiently.

[1]  J. B. Yang,et al.  Dynamic modelling and control of a rotating Euler–Bernoulli beam , 2004 .

[2]  K. M. Liew,et al.  Non-linear substructure approach for dynamic analysis of rigid-flexible multibody systems , 1994 .

[3]  Christophe Pierre,et al.  Finite-Element-Based Nonlinear Modal Reduction of a Rotating Beam with Large-Amplitude Motion , 2003 .

[4]  Dean Karnopp Lagrange’s Equations for Complex Bond Graph Systems , 1977 .

[5]  Hong Hee Yoo,et al.  VIBRATION ANALYSIS OF ROTATING CANTILEVER BEAMS , 1998 .

[6]  Lawrence F. Shampine,et al.  Solving Index-1 DAEs in MATLAB and Simulink , 1999, SIAM Rev..

[7]  Sung-Soo Kim,et al.  A CRITERION ON INCLUSION OF STRESS STIFFENING EFFECTS IN FLEXIBLE MULTIBODY DYNAMIC SYSTEM SIMULATION , 1997 .

[8]  Lawrence F. Shampine,et al.  The MATLAB ODE Suite , 1997, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[9]  E. Haug,et al.  A substructure technique for dynamics of flexible mechanical systems with contact-impact , 1990 .

[10]  Leonard Meirovitch,et al.  Hybrid state equations of motion for flexible bodies in terms of quasi-coordinates , 1991 .

[11]  Donald Margolis BOND GRAPHS, NORMAL MODES AND VEHICULAR STRUCTURES , 1978 .

[12]  D. Williams,et al.  Dynamic loads in aeroplanes under given impulsive loads with particular reference to landing and gust loads on a large flying boat , 1945 .

[13]  Tamer M. Wasfy,et al.  Computational strategies for flexible multibody systems , 2003 .

[14]  R. Rosenberg,et al.  System Dynamics: Modeling and Simulation of Mechatronic Systems , 2006 .

[15]  Jianlian Cheng,et al.  Frequency Analysis of a Rotating Cantilever Beam Using Assumed Mode Method with Coupling Effect , 2006 .

[16]  A. Zeid,et al.  Bond graph modeling of multibody systems: a library of three-dimensional joints , 1992 .

[17]  Eilif Pedersen Rotordynamics and bond graphs: basic models , 2009 .

[18]  Hong Hee Yoo,et al.  Modal analysis and shape optimization of rotating cantilever beams , 2006 .

[19]  Leonard Meirovitch,et al.  Methods of analytical dynamics , 1970 .

[20]  E. Haug,et al.  Geometric non‐linear substructuring for dynamics of flexible mechanical systems , 1988 .