A framework for understanding managerial responses to supply chain complexity

The purpose of this paper is to examine the nature of supply chain complexity and extend this with literature developed within the project domain. The authors use the lens of ambidexterity (the ability both to exploit and explore) to analyse responses to complexity, since this enables the authors to understand the application of known solutions in conjunction with innovative ones to resolve difficulties. This research also seeks to investigate how managers respond to supply chain complexities that can either be operationally deleterious or strategically beneficial.,The authors develop a descriptive framework based on the project management (PM) literature to understand response options to complexity, and then use interviews with supply chain managers in six organisations to examine the utility of this framework in practice. The authors ask the research question “How do managers in supply chains respond to complexities”?,The case study data show first that managers faced with structural, socio-political, or emergent supply chain complexities use a wide range of responses. Second, over a third of the instances of complexity coded were actually accommodated, rather than reduced, by the study firms, suggesting that adapting to supply chain complexity in certain instances may be strategically appropriate. Third, the lens of ambidexterity allows a more explicit assessment of whether existing PM solutions can be considered or if novel methods are required to address supply chain complexities.,The descriptive framework can aid managers in conceptualising and addressing supply chain complexity. Through exploiting current knowledge, managers can lessen the impact of complexity while exploring other innovative approaches to solve new problems and challenges that evolve from complexity growth driven by business strategy.,This study addresses a gap in the literature through the development of a framework which provides a structure on ways to address supply chain complexity. The authors evaluate an existing project complexity concept and demonstrate that it is both applicable and valuable in non-project, ongoing operations. The authors then extend it using the lens of ambidexterity, and develop a framework that can support practitioners in analysing and addressing both strategically necessary supply complexities, together with unwanted, negative complexities within the organisation and across the supply chain.

[1]  Elmar Kutsch,et al.  Towards a conceptualisation of quality in information technology projects , 2011 .

[2]  Ruth Murray-Webster,et al.  Facilitating organizational ambidexterity through the complementary use of projects and programs , 2015 .

[3]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  A conceptual framework for tackling knowable unknown unknowns in project management , 2014 .

[4]  Arnaldo Camuffo,et al.  Rolling out lean production systems: a knowledge-based perspective , 2016 .

[5]  Jack R. Meredith,et al.  Building operations management theory through case and field research , 1998 .

[6]  Ruth Murray-Webster,et al.  How can it be? Actively managing complexity in technology projects , 2014, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[7]  Cecil Bozarth,et al.  The impact of supply chain complexity on manufacturing plant performance , 2009 .

[8]  Filiz Isik,et al.  An entropy-based approach for measuring complexity in supply chains , 2010 .

[9]  Terry Williams,et al.  Assessing and moving on from the dominant project management discourse in the light of project overruns , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[10]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Renaissance of case research as a scientific method , 2014 .

[11]  C. Giménez,et al.  Supply chain integration and performance: the moderating effect of supply complexity , 2012 .

[12]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  The Supply Base and Its Complexity: Implications For Transaction Costs, Risks, Responsiveness, and Innovation , 2006 .

[13]  Constantin Blome,et al.  Ambidextrous Governance in Supply Chains: The Impact on Innovation and Cost Performance , 2013 .

[14]  Maria Nieves Perez-Arostegui,et al.  The impact of ambidexterity on supply chain flexibility fit , 2016 .

[15]  Terry Cooke-Davies,et al.  Exploring the Complexity of Projects: Implications of Complexity Theory for Project Management Practice , 2009 .

[16]  L. Lee-Kelley,et al.  Unpacking the theory on ambidexterity: An illustrative case on the managerial architectures, mechanisms and dynamics , 2013 .

[17]  David Baccarini,et al.  The concept of project complexity—a review , 1996 .

[18]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Green supply chain collaboration and incentives: Current trends and future directions , 2015 .

[19]  A. Shenhar,et al.  The Three Secrets of Megaproject Success: Clear Strategic Vision, Total Alignment, and Adapting to Complexity , 2017 .

[20]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: Control versus emergence , 2001 .

[21]  Denis Royston Towill,et al.  Reducing uncertainty in European supply chains , 2004 .

[22]  Yicheol Han,et al.  Supply chain complexity and risk mitigation – A hybrid optimization–simulation model , 2016 .

[23]  S. Tarba,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity and Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2013 .

[24]  Rick Hoole,et al.  Five ways to simplify your supply chain , 2005 .

[25]  Christopher A. Voss,et al.  Case research in operations management , 2002 .

[26]  Dennis Duchon,et al.  Organizational responses to complexity: the effect on organizational performance , 2000 .

[27]  Samyadip Chakraborty Linking Supply Chain Network Complexity to Interdependence and Risk-Assessment: Scale Development and Empirical Investigation , 2015 .

[28]  E. Schmidt Descubrir -y reducir- los costos reales de la atención de salud , 2011 .

[29]  Weidong Xia,et al.  Complexity of Information Systems Development Projects: Conceptualization and Measurement Development , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Dirk Seifert,et al.  Collaborative Planning, Forecasting, and Replenishment: How to Create a Supply Chain Advantage , 2003 .

[31]  Jay R. Galbraith Organization Design , 1977 .

[32]  F. Sahin,et al.  A model of supply chain and supply chain decision‐making complexity , 2011 .

[33]  J. Wijngaard,et al.  Postponement: an inter-organizational perspective , 2007 .

[34]  Stephan M. Wagner,et al.  Structural drivers of upstream supply chain complexity and the frequency of supply chain disruptions , 2015 .

[35]  E. H. Neilsen,et al.  The subordinate's predicaments. , 1979, Harvard business review.

[36]  Thomas F. Burgess,et al.  Entropic-related complexity for re-engineering a robust supply chain: a case study , 2010 .

[37]  Stephan Vachon,et al.  An exploratory investigation of the effects of supply chain complexity on delivery performance , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[38]  Arun Rai,et al.  Knowledge Sharing Ambidexterity in Long-Term Interorganizational Relationships , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[39]  R. Masson,et al.  Managing complexity in agile global fashion industry supply chains , 2007 .

[40]  Jay R. Galbraith Organization Design: An Information Processing View , 1974 .

[41]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[42]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[43]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Clarifying the Distinctive Contribution of Ambidexterity to the Field of Organization Studies , 2013 .

[44]  Seyda Serdarasan,et al.  A review of supply chain complexity drivers , 2013, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[45]  Li Liu,et al.  Simultaneous Pursuit of Innovation and Efficiency in Complex Engineering Projects—A Study of the Antecedents and Impacts of Ambidexterity in Project Teams , 2012 .

[46]  Tobias Schoenherr,et al.  Revisiting the arcs of integration: Cross-validations and extensions , 2012 .

[47]  Janet Efstathiou,et al.  A method for analysing operational complexity in supply chains , 2013, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[48]  Jack R. Meredith,et al.  Project Management: A Managerial Approach , 1989 .

[49]  K. Johnston,et al.  The influence of business managers' IT competence on IT project success , 2017 .

[50]  M. Fisher What is the Right Supply Chain for Your Product , 1997 .

[51]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[52]  Antônio Márcio Tavares Thomé,et al.  Similarities and contrasts of complexity, uncertainty, risks, and resilience in supply chains and temporary multi-organization projects , 2016 .

[53]  M. Frohlich,et al.  Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies , 2001 .

[54]  Keith Aspinall,et al.  Innovation versus complexity: what is too much of a good thing? , 2005, Harvard business review.

[55]  Dov Dvir,et al.  In search of project classification: a non-universal approach to project success factors , 1998 .

[56]  Cecil C. Bozarth,et al.  To eliminate or absorb supply chain complexity: a conceptual model and case study , 2016 .

[57]  Sander de Leeuw,et al.  Assessing complexity of supply chains: evidence from wholesalers , 2013 .

[58]  Barbara B. Flynn,et al.  The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach , 2010 .

[59]  J. Morse Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed): Mathew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994. Price: $65.00 hardback, $32.00 paperback. 238 pp , 1996 .

[60]  Patrik Jonsson,et al.  When should advanced planning and scheduling systems be used in sales and operations planning , 2014 .

[61]  S. Sarpong,et al.  Traceability and supply chain complexity: confronting the issues and concerns , 2014 .

[62]  Matthew A. Waller,et al.  Can We Stay Ahead of the Obsolescence Curve? On Inflection Points, Proactive Preemption, and the Future of Supply Chain Management , 2014 .

[63]  Dennis E. Blumenfeld,et al.  Product complexity and supply chain design , 2014 .

[64]  J. Swart,et al.  Making it happen: How managerial actions enable project-based ambidexterity , 2016 .

[65]  Harvey Maylor,et al.  Now, let's make it really complex (complicated): A systematic review of the complexities of projects , 2011 .

[66]  A. Jaafari Project Management in the Age of Complexity and Change , 2003 .

[67]  A. Roth,et al.  The effect of an ambidextrous supply chain strategy on combinative competitive capabilities and business performance , 2010 .

[68]  B. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Why Your IT Project May Be Riskier than You Think , 2011 .

[69]  Gregory R. Heim,et al.  Longitudinal Analysis of Inhibitors of Manufacturer Delivery Performance , 2013, Decis. Sci..

[70]  Andrew Davies,et al.  Building Project Capabilities: From Exploratory to Exploitative Learning , 2004 .

[71]  Pankaj C. Patel,et al.  Enhancing effects of manufacturing flexibility through operational absorptive capacity and operational ambidexterity , 2012 .

[72]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  On Uncertainty, Ambiguity, and Complexity in Project Management , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[73]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future , 2013 .

[74]  Tore Dybå,et al.  Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review , 2008, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[75]  Mei Li,et al.  Qualitative case studies in operations management: Trends, research outcomes, and future research implications , 2011 .

[76]  B. McKelvey,et al.  Complexity Leadership Theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era ! , 2007 .

[77]  Giovanni Miragliotta,et al.  Complexity management and supply chain performance assessment. A field study and a conceptual framework , 2004 .

[78]  Harvey Maylor,et al.  Understand, reduce, respond: project complexity management theory and practice , 2017 .

[79]  M. Tushman,et al.  The ambidextrous organization. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[80]  R. Eltantawy The role of supply management resilience in attaining ambidexterity: a dynamic capabilities approach , 2016 .

[81]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[82]  R. Ackoff The Future of Operational Research is Past , 1979 .

[83]  Nigel King,et al.  Using templates in the thematic analysis of text , 2004 .

[84]  J. Swart,et al.  Mechanisms for Managing Ambidexterity: A Review and Research Agenda , 2013 .

[85]  Jun-gi Park,et al.  Knowledge sharing in information systems development projects: Explicating the role of dependence and trust , 2014 .

[86]  Brian Fynes,et al.  The moderating effect of buyer‐supplier relationships on quality practices and performance , 2002 .

[87]  Sang M. Lee,et al.  Ambidextrous supply chain as a dynamic capability: building a resilient supply chain , 2016 .

[88]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Sourcing By Design: Product Complexity and the Supply Chain , 2001, Manag. Sci..