Analytical Models of the Performance of IEEE 802.11p Vehicle to Vehicle Communications

The critical nature of vehicular communications requires their extensive testing and evaluation. Analytical models can represent an attractive and cost-effective approach for such evaluation if they can adequately model all underlying effects that impact the performance of vehicular communications. Several analytical models have been proposed to date to model vehicular communications based on the IEEE 802.11p (or DSRC) standard. However, existing models normally model in detail the MAC (Medium Access Control), and generally simplify the propagation and interference effects. This reduces their value as an alternative to evaluate the performance of vehicular communications. This paper addresses this gap, and presents new analytical models that accurately model the performance of vehicle-to-vehicle communications based on the IEEE 802.11p standard. The models jointly account for a detailed modeling of the propagation and interference effects, as well as the impact of the hidden terminal problem. The model quantifies the PDR (Packet Delivery Ratio) as a function of the distance between transmitter and receiver. The paper also presents new analytical models to quantify the probability of the four different types of packet errors in IEEE 802.11p. In addition, the paper presents the first analytical model capable to accurately estimate the Channel Busy Ratio (CBR) metric even under high channel load levels. All the analytical models are validated by means of simulation for a wide range of parameters, including traffic densities, packet transmission frequencies, transmission power levels, data rates and packet sizes. An implementation of the models is provided openly to facilitate their use by the community.

[1]  Jinsong Zhang,et al.  Reliability Analysis of One-Hop Safety-Critical Broadcast Services in VANETs , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[2]  Barbara M. Masini,et al.  On the Performance of IEEE 802.11p and LTE-V2V for the Cooperative Awareness of Connected Vehicles , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[3]  Sushil Kumar,et al.  Performance Analysis of IEEE 802.11p in the Presence of Hidden Terminals , 2016, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[4]  Yuguang Fang,et al.  Performance Analysis of IEEE 802.11 DCF in Imperfect Channels , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[5]  Tobias J. Oechtering,et al.  Low-Complexity Scalable Iterative Algorithms for IEEE 802.11p Receivers , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[6]  Lin Hu,et al.  Performance Analysis of DSRC-Based Vehicular Safety Communication in Imperfect Channels , 2020, IEEE Access.

[7]  Yevgeni Koucheryavy,et al.  Modeling Broadcasting in IEEE 802.11p/WAVE Vehicular Networks , 2011, IEEE Communications Letters.

[8]  A. F. M. Shahen Shah,et al.  Modeling and performance analysis of the IEEE 802.11P Enhanced Distributed Channel Access function for vehicular network , 2016, 2016 Future Technologies Conference (FTC).

[9]  Miguel Sepulcre,et al.  Analytical Models of the Performance of C-V2X Mode 4 Vehicular Communications , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[10]  Jun Zheng,et al.  Modeling and Performance Analysis of Periodic Broadcast in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference - GLOBECOM 2011.

[11]  Mate Boban,et al.  Impact of Vehicles as Obstacles in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks , 2011, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[12]  Xue Liu,et al.  Delay analysis and study of IEEE 802.11p based DSRC safety communication in a highway environment , 2013, 2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[13]  Sumit Roy,et al.  Efficiency and Reliability of One-Hop Broadcasting in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks , 2011, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[14]  Vladimir Shepelev,et al.  Saturation Throughput Analysis of Steganography in the IEEE 802.11p Protocol in the Presence of Non-Ideal Transmission Channel , 2021, IEEE Access.

[15]  Sven Maerivoet Tml Assessment of Traffic Management Procedures in Transition Areas , 2018 .

[16]  Georg Volk,et al.  Collective Perception: A Safety Perspective † , 2020, Sensors.

[17]  Jo Woon Chong,et al.  Cross-Layer Performance Analysis for CSMA/CA Protocols: Impact of Imperfect Sensing , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[18]  Hai Le Vu,et al.  Performance Analysis of the IEEE 802.11 MAC Protocol for DSRC Safety Applications , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[19]  Ufuk Tureli,et al.  Modeling and Performance Analysis of the IEEE 802.11P MAC for VANETs , 2019, 2019 42nd International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP).

[20]  Hazen Probability An Introduction with , 2017 .

[21]  Fred Daneshgaran,et al.  Unsaturated Throughput Analysis of IEEE 802.11 in Presence of Non Ideal Transmission Channel and Capture Effects , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[22]  Victor C. S. Lee,et al.  An accurate and complete performance modeling of the IEEE 802.11p MAC sublayer for VANET , 2020, Comput. Commun..

[23]  Luca Delgrossi,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of Channel Load in Vehicle Safety Communications , 2011, 2011 IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall).

[24]  Michael Maile,et al.  Vehicle Safety Communications – Applications (VSC-A) Final Report: Appendix Volume 2 Communications and Positioning , 2011 .

[25]  Caixia Song,et al.  Performance Analysis of the IEEE 802.11p Multichannel MAC Protocol in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks , 2017, Sensors.

[26]  Rahim Tafazolli,et al.  Analytical Study of the IEEE 802.11p MAC Sublayer in Vehicular Networks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[27]  Bo Hu,et al.  Modeling and QoS analysis of the IEEE 802.11p broadcast scheme in vehicular ad hoc networks , 2017, Journal of Communications and Networks.

[28]  Abderrahmane Amrouche,et al.  Modeling and performance analysis of the IEEE 802.11p EDCA mechanism for VANET under saturation traffic conditions and error-prone channel , 2019 .

[29]  Xue Liu,et al.  Performance and Reliability Analysis of IEEE 802.11p Safety Communication in a Highway Environment , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[30]  Ignacio Llatser,et al.  Analytical Performance Evaluation of the Collective Perception Service in IEEE 802.11p Networks , 2020, 2020 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).

[31]  Fu-Yi Hung,et al.  Performance analysis of the IEEE 802.11 DCF in the presence of the hidden stations , 2010, Comput. Networks.

[32]  Jun Zheng,et al.  Performance Modeling and Analysis of the IEEE 802.11p EDCA Mechanism for VANET , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[33]  A. Girotra,et al.  Performance Analysis of the IEEE 802 . 11 Distributed Coordination Function , 2005 .