Rates of Time Preference and Consumer Valuations of Automobile Safety and Fuel Efficiency

This article estimates hedonic price models for automobiles using a data set on almost 3,000 households from the U.S. Department of Energy Residential Transportation Energy Consumption Survey. The standard hedonic models are generalized to recognize the role of discounting of fuel efficiency and safety, yielding an estimated rate of time preference ranging from 11 to 17 percent. This range includes the prevailing rate of interest for car loans in 1988 and is consequently consistent with market rates. Purchasers exhibit an implicit value of life ranging from $2.6 to $3.7 million, which is within the range found in the labor market as well as other market contexts. The model also estimates a significant price effect for auto injury risks and fuel efficiency.

[1]  Michael J. Moore,et al.  The Quantity-Adjusted Value of Life , 1988 .

[2]  Thomas F. Hogarty,et al.  Price-quality relations for automobiles: a new approach , 1975 .

[3]  Keith Cowling,et al.  Hedonic Price Indexes for United Kingdom Cars , 1972 .

[4]  Scott E. Atkinson,et al.  THE VALUATION OF RISKS TO LIFE : EVIDENCE FROM THE MARKET FOR AUTOMOBILES , 1990 .

[5]  Michael J. Moore,et al.  Discounting environmental health risks: New evidence and policy implications , 1990 .

[6]  L. Boden.  Employment hazards: An investigation of market performance: W. Kip Viscusi. Harvard Economics Studies, Vol. 148. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. 1979. 308 pp. $20.00. , 1981 .

[7]  W. Kip Viscusi,et al.  Employment Hazards: An Investigation of Market Performance , 1979 .

[8]  Jeffrey A. Dubin.  Will Mandatory Conservation Promote Energy Efficiency in the Selection of Household Appliance Stocks? , 1986 .

[9]  James E. McMahon,et al.  The Behavior of the Market for Energy Efficiency in Residential Appliances Including Heating and Cooling Equipment , 1987 .

[10]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Automobile Prices and Quality: Did the Gasoline Price Increases Change Consumer Tastes in the U.S.? , 1986 .

[11]  D. A. Houston,et al.  Implicit Discount Rates and the Purchase of Untried, Energy-Saving Durable Goods , 1983 .

[12]  S. Peltzman.  The Effects of Automobile Safety Regulation , 1975, Journal of Political Economy.

[13]  W. Viscusi.  Fatal Tradeoffs: Public and Private Responsibilities for Risk , 1992 .

[14]  R. Reilly,et al.  Automobile styling as a shift variable: an investigation by firm and by industry , 1984 .

[15]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Price Indexes And Quality Change , 1973 .

[16]  Scott E. Atkinson,et al.  A New Hedonic Technique for Estimating Attribute Demand: An Application to the Demand for Automobile Fuel Efficiency , 1984 .

[17]  Jerry A. Hausman,et al.  Individual Discount Rates and the Purchase and Utilization of Energy-Using Durables , 1979 .

[18]  Michael J. Moore,et al.  Rates of time preference and valuations of the duration of life , 1989 .

[19]  A. Goodman.  WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR CAR EFFICIENCY. A HEDONIC PRICE APPROACH , 1983 .

[20]  S. Rosen.  Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition , 1974, Journal of Political Economy.

[21]  Michael J. Moore,et al.  Models for estimating discount rates for long-term health risks using labor market data , 1990 .

[22]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Automobile Prices Revisited: Extensions of the Hedonic Hypothesis , 1976 .

[23]  J. Triplett.  Automobiles and Hedonic Quality Measurement , 1969, Journal of Political Economy.

[24]  Dermot Gately,et al.  Individual Discount Rates and the Purchase and Utilization of Energy-Using Durables: Comment , 1980 .