A prospective randomized pilot study to evaluate predictors of response in serial core biopsies to single agent neoadjuvant doxorubicin or paclitaxel for patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer can be correlated with long-term outcomes. Surrogate end-point biomarkers may be used to assess response to the treatment. Most reported studies assessed the effects of combination chemotherapy. We assessed the feasibility of obtaining serial core breast biopsies, and correlated rates of apoptosis, proliferation, and expression of related proteins at baseline, during, and after neoadjuvant single agent chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer with response. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Women with a histologically confirmed unresected T(3) or T(4) infiltrating carcinoma of the breast were eligible. The first 20 patients received three cycles of doxorubicin 90 mg/m(2) followed by three cycles of paclitaxel 250 mg/m(2), or the reverse. Nine women received four cycles of each (doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2)). Cycles were administered 14 days apart with filgastrim. End points included: (a). clinical and pathological response; (b). serial apoptotic [terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (Tdt)-mediated nick end labeling] and proliferation (immunohistochemistry, IHC) rates; and (c). expression (IHC) of estrogen receptor, HER2, bcl2, and p53. RESULTS From April 1997 to June 2001, 29 women were randomized. Twelve patients (42%) had a clinical complete response (cCR), and 16 (55%) had a clinical partial response. Five women (17%) had a pathological complete response, 7 (24%) had microscopic residual disease, and 17 (58%) had macroscopic residual disease. Higher baseline apoptosis and proliferation were associated with an improved pathological response (P = 0.006 and 0.003, respectively). Among 14 evaluable patients, apoptosis increased in women who had a cCR to the first agent but not in women without a cCR. Estrogen receptor-positive patients had a worse pathological response (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS The selected regimen is efficacious. It is feasible to obtain serial core biopsies that are informative for studies of apoptosis and IHC. This clinical design can serve as a model for combining standard chemotherapy and novel agents.

[1]  M. Untch,et al.  Her-2/neu gene amplification and response to paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  D. Berry,et al.  Failure of higher-dose paclitaxel to improve outcome in patients with metastatic breast cancer: cancer and leukemia group B trial 9342. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  Dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin and paclitaxel versus the combination, as first-line chemotherapy, in advanced breast cancer: a randomized study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  D. Hayes,et al.  When is a tumor marker ready for prime time? A case study of c-erbB-2 as a predictive factor in breast cancer. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  W. Symmans,et al.  Paclitaxel-induced apoptosis and mitotic arrest assessed by serial fine-needle aspiration: implications for early prediction of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant treatment. , 2000, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[6]  A. Goldhirsch,et al.  Response to primary chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with tumors not expressing estrogen and progesterone receptors. , 2000, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[7]  Mike Clarke,et al.  UK and USA breast cancer deaths down 25% in year 2000 at ages 20–69 years , 2000, The Lancet.

[8]  D. Wickerham,et al.  Further evaluation of intensified and increased total dose of cyclophosphamide for the treatment of primary breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-25. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  C. Osborne,et al.  Biologic markers as predictors of clinical outcome from systemic therapy for primary operable breast cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  C. Hudis,et al.  5-year results of dose-intensive sequential adjuvant chemotherapy for women with high-risk node-positive breast cancer: A phase II study. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  T. Powles,et al.  Clinical studies of apoptosis and proliferation in breast cancer. , 1999, Endocrine-related cancer.

[12]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  Anna L. Brown,et al.  Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  Mike Clarke,et al.  Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials , 1998, The Lancet.

[15]  Terry L. Smith,et al.  Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. , 1998, Lancet.

[16]  C. Osborne,et al.  bcl-2, p53, and response to tamoxifen in estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  M. Dowsett,et al.  Preoperative chemotherapy induces apoptosis in early breast cancer , 1997, The Lancet.

[18]  C. Hudis,et al.  Paclitaxel as second and subsequent therapy for metastatic breast cancer: activity independent of prior anthracycline response. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  E. Mamounas,et al.  Preoperative chemotherapy: a model for studying the biology and therapy of primary breast cancer. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  U. Chetty,et al.  Primary systemic therapy for operable breast cancer. , 1991, British Journal of Cancer.

[21]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Pathological assessment of response to induction chemotherapy in breast cancer. , 1986, Cancer research.

[22]  R. Simon,et al.  The relation between estrogen receptors and response rate to cytotoxic chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. , 1978, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  Philip H. Ramsey Nonparametric Statistical Methods , 1974, Technometrics.

[24]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[25]  T. Powles,et al.  Quantitative changes in cytological molecular markers during primary medical treatment of breast cancer: A pilot study , 2004, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[26]  M. Gnant,et al.  TP53 mutation and p53 overexpression for prediction of response to neoadjuvant treatment in breast cancer patients. , 2000, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[27]  R. Wittes,et al.  Evaluation of the Cancer Patient and the Response to Treatment , 1987 .

[28]  D. Morton,et al.  Treatment of metastatic disease. , 1979, Advances in surgery.

[29]  C. Haagensen Diseases of the Breast , 1971 .