Transforming e‐assessment in American Sign Language: pedagogical and technological enhancements in online language learning and performance assessment

The rapid increase in demand for American Sign Language (ASL) instruction between 1998 and 2002 created pervasive challenges in effectively assessing and documenting ASL learner performance. To address these challenges, we designed and developed the Avenue ASL e‐assessment environment: an integrated, network‐based software system to capture, evaluate, and manage ASL learner performances. In this paper, we present a design overview of the Avenue ASL system and use a lens of design‐based research to examine how the theoretical foundations of the project have been enhanced through an iterative continuation of theory, design, and implementation research. The paper concludes with a discussion of potential further design applications, beyond ASL.

[1]  J Kondo,et al.  [Educational assessment]. , 1968, [Kango kyoiku] Japanese journal of nurses' education.

[2]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[3]  S. Deno,et al.  Curriculum-Based Measurement: The Emerging Alternative , 1985, Exceptional children.

[4]  Stephen Wilbers.  The Case for Recognizing American Sign Language. , 1987 .

[5]  C M Reed,et al.  A study of the tactual and visual reception of fingerspelling. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[6]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Motor Learning in Sign Language Students , 2013 .

[7]  Belita Gordon,et al.  Conceptual issues in equating performance assessments : lessons from writing assessment , 1996 .

[8]  J. K. Caird,et al.  The effect of frame rate and video information redundancy on the perceptual learning of American Sign Language gestures , 1996, CHI Conference Companion.

[9]  Richard I. Brod,et al.  Foreign Language Enrollments in United States Institutions of Higher Education, Fall 1995. , 1997 .

[10]  Mark R. Shinn,et al.  Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement , 1998 .

[11]  Melissa A. Wadell.  Should Western Michigan University Accept American Sign Language as a Foreign Language , 1998 .

[12]  M. Kemp,et al.  Why is Learning American Sign Language a Challenge? , 1998, American annals of the deaf.

[13]  Marc Marschark,et al.  Educating Deaf Students: From Research to Practice , 2001, DECP Debate.

[14]  Design-Based Research: An Emerging Paradigm for Educational Inquiry , 2003 .

[15]  G. Mirus,et al.  American Sign Language in virtual space: Interactions between deaf users of computer-mediated video communication and the impact of technology on language practices , 2003, Language in Society.

[16]  Stanley L. Deno,et al.  Developments in Curriculum-Based Measurement , 2003 .

[17]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  A development research agenda for online collaborative learning , 2004 .

[18]  Noam Tractinsky,et al.  Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites , 2004 .

[19]  W. Sandoval.  Developing Learning Theory by Refining Conjectures Embodied in Educational Designs , 2004 .

[20]  Richard J. Stiggins,et al.  New Assessment Beliefs for a New School Mission , 2004 .

[21]  Susan Rose,et al.  Avenue ASL: Developing an environment for the support of Learning in technology education. , 2005 .

[22]  Susan Rose,et al.  Avenue ASL: Developing an Environment for Assessing American Sign Language Learner Performance , 2005 .

[23]  John L. Luckner,et al.  Assessment Practices of Professionals Serving Students Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: An Initial Investigation , 2006, American annals of the deaf.

[24]  Simon Charles Susan George Hooper,et al.  The Effects of Digital Video Quality on Learner Comprehension in an American Sign Language Assessment Environment , 2007 .

[25]  Susan Rose,et al.  Avenue ASL: Transforming Curriculum through Design and Innovation , 2008 .