Simulation study of penetration electric field effects on the low‐ to mid‐latitude ionosphere

[1] The first self-consistent study of the impact of storm-time penetration electric fields on the low- to mid-latitude ionosphere is presented. The inner magnetosphere is described by the Rice Convection Model (RCM) and the ionosphere is described by the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) code SAMI3. The codes are coupled electrodynamically through the electrostatic potential equation, and the storm is modeled via changes in the polar cap potential. Neutral wind driven electric fields are estimated from the Fejer/Scherliess quiet time model. It is found that temporal changes in the polar cap potential produce electric fields that modify the F region equatorial E × B drift velocities: the velocities increase in the daytime and decrease in the nighttime by up to a factor of two. This causes the total electron content (TEC) in the daytime, mid-latitude ionosphere to increase by up to 35%. In addition, the ‘fountain effect’ is enhanced in the post-sunset period.

[1]  R. Hilmer,et al.  A magnetospheric magnetic field model with flexible current systems driven by independent physical parameters , 1995 .

[2]  F. Toffoletto,et al.  Inner magnetospheric modeling with the Rice Convection Model , 2003 .

[3]  S. Sazykin.  Theoretical Studies of Penetration of Magnetospheric Electric Fields to the Ionosphere , 2000 .

[4]  R. Spiro,et al.  Latitudinal variation of perturbation electric fields during magnetically disturbed periods - 1986 Sundial observations and model results , 1990 .

[5]  Timothy Fuller-Rowell,et al.  Interaction between direct penetration and disturbance dynamo electric fields in the storm‐time equatorial ionosphere , 2005 .

[6]  Ludger Scherliess,et al.  Radar and satellite global equatorial F-region vertical drift model , 1999 .

[7]  L. Scherliess,et al.  Time dependent response of equatorial ionospheric electric fields to magnetospheric disturbances , 1995 .

[8]  T. Garner.  Numerical experiments on the inner magnetospheric electric field , 2003 .

[9]  S. Basu,et al.  Ionospheric effects of major magnetic storms during the International Space Weather Period of September and October 1999: GPS observations, VHF/UHF scintillations, and in situ density structures at middle and equatorial latitudes , 2001 .

[10]  B. Fejer,et al.  An explanation for anomalous equatorial ionospheric electric fields associated with a northward turning of the interplanetary magnetic field , 1979 .

[11]  R. Wolf.  Effects of ionospheric conductivity on convective flow of plasma in the magnetosphere , 1970 .

[12]  D. Drob,et al.  Nrlmsise-00 Empirical Model of the Atmosphere: Statistical Comparisons and Scientific Issues , 2002 .

[13]  J. Fedder,et al.  Simulation study of mid‐latitude ionosphere fluctuations observed at Millstone Hill , 2003 .

[14]  R. W. Spiro,et al.  Penetration of high latitude electric fields effects tolow latitude during Sundial 1984 , 1988 .

[15]  Philip J. Erickson,et al.  Ionospheric signatures of plasmaspheric tails , 2002 .

[16]  Philip J. Erickson,et al.  A strong positive phase of ionospheric storms observed by the Millstone Hill incoherent scatter radar and global GPS network , 2005 .

[17]  Richard A. Wolf,et al.  Self‐consistent calculation of the motion of a sheet of ions in the magnetosphere , 1973 .

[18]  Glenn Joyce,et al.  Sami2 is Another Model of the Ionosphere (SAMI2): A new low-latitude ionosphere model , 2000 .

[19]  Y. Chiu.  An improved phenomenological model of ionospheric density , 1975 .

[20]  R. Wolf,et al.  The quasi-static (slow-flow) region of the magnetosphere , 1983 .