SnugDock: Paratope Structural Optimization during Antibody-Antigen Docking Compensates for Errors in Antibody Homology Models

High resolution structures of antibody-antigen complexes are useful for analyzing the binding interface and to make rational choices for antibody engineering. When a crystallographic structure of a complex is unavailable, the structure must be predicted using computational tools. In this work, we illustrate a novel approach, named SnugDock, to predict high-resolution antibody-antigen complex structures by simultaneously structurally optimizing the antibody-antigen rigid-body positions, the relative orientation of the antibody light and heavy chains, and the conformations of the six complementarity determining region loops. This approach is especially useful when the crystal structure of the antibody is not available, requiring allowances for inaccuracies in an antibody homology model which would otherwise frustrate rigid-backbone docking predictions. Local docking using SnugDock with the lowest-energy RosettaAntibody homology model produced more accurate predictions than standard rigid-body docking. SnugDock can be combined with ensemble docking to mimic conformer selection and induced fit resulting in increased sampling of diverse antibody conformations. The combined algorithm produced four medium (Critical Assessment of PRediction of Interactions-CAPRI rating) and seven acceptable lowest-interface-energy predictions in a test set of fifteen complexes. Structural analysis shows that diverse paratope conformations are sampled, but docked paratope backbones are not necessarily closer to the crystal structure conformations than the starting homology models. The accuracy of SnugDock predictions suggests a new genre of general docking algorithms with flexible binding interfaces targeted towards making homology models useful for further high-resolution predictions.

[1]  Yang Zhang Protein structure prediction: when is it useful? , 2009, Current opinion in structural biology.

[2]  C. Dominguez,et al.  HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[3]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  RosettaAntibody: antibody variable region homology modeling server , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[4]  A. Pavlou,et al.  Monoclonal antibodies market , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[5]  Alexandre M J J Bonvin,et al.  Flexible protein-protein docking. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[6]  T. Oliphant,et al.  Structural basis of West Nile virus neutralization by a therapeutic antibody , 2005, Nature.

[7]  J. Engler,et al.  Expressed murine and human CDR-H3 intervals of equal length exhibit distinct repertoires that differ in their amino acid composition and predicted range of structures. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  G. A. Lazar,et al.  A molecular immunology approach to antibody humanization and functional optimization. , 2007, Molecular immunology.

[10]  O Noivirt,et al.  Docking to single‐domain and multiple‐domain proteins: Old and new challenges , 2005, Proteins.

[11]  P. Griffin,et al.  Rapid analysis of protein structure and dynamics by hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry. , 2003, Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT.

[12]  J Navaza,et al.  Three-dimensional structures of the free and the antigen-complexed Fab from monoclonal anti-lysozyme antibody D44.1. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  A R Rees,et al.  WAM: an improved algorithm for modelling antibodies on the WEB. , 2000, Protein engineering.

[14]  W G Laver,et al.  Refined crystal structure of the influenza virus N9 neuraminidase-NC41 Fab complex. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  J. Janin The targets of CAPRI rounds 3–5 , 2005, Proteins.

[16]  A. Lesk,et al.  Standard conformations for the canonical structures of immunoglobulins. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  Conformer selection and induced fit in flexible backbone protein-protein docking using computational and NMR ensembles. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  M. Nilges,et al.  Complementarity of structure ensembles in protein-protein binding. , 2004, Structure.

[19]  B. Kuhlman,et al.  Computational design of affinity and specificity at protein-protein interfaces. , 2009, Current opinion in structural biology.

[20]  Enrique Vargas‐Madrazo,et al.  An improved model of association for VH–VL immunoglobulin domains: Asymmetries between VH and VL in the packing of some interface residues , 2003, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[21]  Juan Fernández-Recio,et al.  Pushing Structural Information into the Yeast Interactome by High-Throughput Protein Docking Experiments , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[22]  E. Padlan,et al.  Antibody-antigen complexes. , 1988, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[23]  D. Baker,et al.  Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  B. Honig,et al.  A hierarchical approach to all‐atom protein loop prediction , 2004, Proteins.

[25]  J. Janin The targets of CAPRI rounds 6–12 , 2007, Proteins.

[26]  Jens Meiler,et al.  Using the natural evolution of a rotavirus-specific human monoclonal antibody to predict the complex topography of a viral antigenic site , 2007, Immunome research.

[27]  R. Stevens,et al.  Structure-based epitope and PEGylation sites mapping of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase for enzyme substitution treatment of phenylketonuria. , 2007, Molecular genetics and metabolism.

[28]  P. Bradley,et al.  Toward High-Resolution de Novo Structure Prediction for Small Proteins , 2005, Science.

[29]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Structural classification of CDR‐H3 in antibodies , 1996, FEBS letters.

[30]  David Baker,et al.  Protein Structure Prediction Using Rosetta , 2004, Numerical Computer Methods, Part D.

[31]  Sandor Vajda,et al.  Modeling of protein interactions in genomes , 2002, Proteins.

[32]  Ilya A Vakser,et al.  Docking of protein models , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[33]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Geometry‐based flexible and symmetric protein docking , 2005, Proteins.

[34]  Sandor Vajda,et al.  CAPRI: A Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions , 2003, Proteins.

[35]  Michael J E Sternberg,et al.  Evaluation of the 3D‐Dock protein docking suite in rounds 1 and 2 of the CAPRI blind trial , 2003, Proteins.

[36]  S. Wodak,et al.  Assessment of CAPRI predictions in rounds 3–5 shows progress in docking procedures , 2005, Proteins.

[37]  Bruce Tidor,et al.  Computational design of antibody-affinity improvement beyond in vivo maturation , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[38]  Roland L Dunbrack,et al.  Outcome of a workshop on applications of protein models in biomedical research. , 2009, Structure.

[39]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  Incorporating biochemical information and backbone flexibility in RosettaDock for CAPRI rounds 6–12 , 2007, Proteins.

[40]  Janice M Reichert,et al.  Handbook of therapeutic antibodies , 2007 .

[41]  H. V. van Vlijmen,et al.  Structure activity relationships of monocyte chemoattractant proteins in complex with a blocking antibody. , 2006, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[42]  O. Schueler‐Furman,et al.  Improved side‐chain modeling for protein–protein docking , 2005, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[43]  A. Lesk,et al.  Canonical structures for the hypervariable regions of immunoglobulins. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[44]  A. Plückthun,et al.  Fully synthetic human combinatorial antibody libraries (HuCAL) based on modular consensus frameworks and CDRs randomized with trinucleotides. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[45]  I D Kuntz,et al.  Macromolecular docking of a three‐body system: The recognition of human growth hormone by its receptor , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[46]  A Tramontano,et al.  Conformations of the third hypervariable region in the VH domain of immunoglobulins. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[47]  Adrian A Canutescu,et al.  Cyclic coordinate descent: A robotics algorithm for protein loop closure , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[48]  A. Warshel,et al.  What are the dielectric “constants” of proteins and how to validate electrostatic models? , 2001, Proteins.

[49]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  H3‐rules: identification of CDR‐H3 structures in antibodies , 1999, FEBS letters.

[50]  David E. Kim,et al.  Computational Alanine Scanning of Protein-Protein Interfaces , 2004, Science's STKE.

[51]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  Toward high‐resolution homology modeling of antibody Fv regions and application to antibody–antigen docking , 2009, Proteins.

[52]  Benjamin D. Sellers,et al.  Energy-based analysis and prediction of the orientation between light- and heavy-chain antibody variable domains. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[53]  David Baker,et al.  Protein-protein docking with backbone flexibility. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[54]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  High-resolution protein-protein docking. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[55]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  A Method for Biomolecular Structural Recognition and Docking Allowing Conformational Flexibility , 1998, J. Comput. Biol..

[56]  R Nussinov,et al.  Flexible docking allowing induced fit in proteins: Insights from an open to closed conformational isomers , 1998, Proteins.

[57]  D. Svergun,et al.  Dissecting NGF interactions with TrkA and p75 receptors by structural and functional studies of an anti-NGF neutralizing antibody. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[58]  Gary Walsh,et al.  Biopharmaceutical benchmarks 2006 , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.