Systematic Review of the Application of Lean and Six Sigma Quality Improvement Methodologies in Radiology.

PURPOSE Preventable yet clinically significant rates of medical error remain systemic, while health care spending is at a historic high. Industry-based quality improvement (QI) methodologies show potential for utility in health care and radiology because they use an empirical approach to reduce variability and improve workflow. The aim of this review was to systematically assess the literature with regard to the use and efficacy of Lean and Six Sigma (the most popular of the industrial QI methodologies) within radiology. METHODS MEDLINE, the Allied & Complementary Medicine Database, Embase Classic + Embase, Health and Psychosocial Instruments, and the Ovid HealthStar database, alongside the Cochrane Library databases, were searched on June 2015. Empirical studies in peer-reviewed journals were included if they assessed the use of Lean, Six Sigma, or Lean Six Sigma with regard to their ability to improve a variety of quality metrics in a radiology-centered clinical setting. RESULTS Of the 278 articles returned, 23 studies were suitable for inclusion. Of these, 10 assessed Six Sigma, 7 assessed Lean, and 6 assessed Lean Six Sigma. The diverse range of measured outcomes can be organized into 7 common aims: cost savings, reducing appointment wait time, reducing in-department wait time, increasing patient volume, reducing cycle time, reducing defects, and increasing staff and patient safety and satisfaction. All of the included studies demonstrated improvements across a variety of outcomes. However, there were high rates of systematic bias and imprecision as per the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines. CONCLUSIONS Lean and Six Sigma QI methodologies have the potential to reduce error and costs and improve quality within radiology. However, there is a pressing need to conduct high-quality studies in order to realize the true potential of these QI methodologies in health care and radiology. Recommendations on how to improve the quality of the literature are proposed.

[1]  J. Lancaster,et al.  Rates of disagreement in imaging interpretation in a group of community hospitals. , 1998, Academic radiology.

[2]  Yan-Kwang Chen,et al.  Taiwan: Improving Radiography Through Application of Six Sigma Techniques , 2005, Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality.

[3]  Improving Communication and Documentation Concerning Preliminary and Final Radiology Reports , 2007, Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality.

[4]  J. Kang,et al.  The application of the Six Sigma program for the quality management of the PACS. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  P. Kaboli,et al.  Guiding inpatient quality improvement: a systematic review of Lean and Six Sigma. , 2010, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[6]  M. O’Connor,et al.  Quality initiatives: improving patient flow for a bone densitometry practice: results from a Mayo Clinic radiology quality initiative. , 2010, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[7]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine [serial online].

[8]  Li Zhang,et al.  Enhancing same-day access to magnetic resonance imaging. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[9]  Wen-Ta Chiu,et al.  Applying Six Sigma methodology to maximise magnetic resonance imaging capacity in a hospital , 2005 .

[10]  Ara Darzi,et al.  The use of Lean and Six Sigma methodologies in surgery: a systematic review. , 2015, The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland.

[11]  Catherine C Roberts,et al.  Quality initiatives: developing a radiology quality and safety program: a primer. , 2009, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[12]  Mehmet Tolga Taner,et al.  Application of Six Sigma methodology to a diagnostic imaging process. , 2012, International journal of health care quality assurance.

[13]  J. Vest,et al.  A critical review of the research literature on Six Sigma, Lean and StuderGroup's Hardwiring Excellence in the United States: the need to demonstrate and communicate the effectiveness of transformation strategies in healthcare , 2009, Implementation science : IS.

[14]  A. Darzi,et al.  Systematic review of the application of quality improvement methodologies from the manufacturing industry to surgical healthcare , 2012, The British journal of surgery.

[15]  I. Cowan,et al.  Measuring and managing radiologist workload: Application of lean and constraint theories and production planning principles to planning radiology services in a major tertiary hospital , 2013, Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology.

[16]  Ann Loree,et al.  The path of least resistance: is there a better route? , 2003, Radiology management.

[17]  G. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[18]  M. McInnes,et al.  CT in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of interpretation discrepancy rates. , 2014, Radiology.

[19]  Robert Loose.  A better way to perform portable x-rays. , 2011, Radiology management.

[20]  Y. F. Chen,et al.  The Effectiveness of Service Delivery Initiatives at Improving Patients’ Waiting Times in Clinical Radiology Departments: A Systematic Review , 2014, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[21]  M. Viau,et al.  Six Sigma and Lean concepts, a case study: patient centered care model for a mammography center. , 2007, Radiology management.

[22]  H. Tamim,et al.  Improving Emergency Department radiology transportation time: a successful implementation of lean methodology , 2017, BMC Health Services Research.

[23]  P. Sutphin,et al.  Improving inferior vena cava filter retrieval rates with the define, measure, analyze, improve, control methodology. , 2015, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[24]  C. Landrigan,et al.  Temporal trends in rates of patient harm resulting from medical care. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  J. Bahensky,et al.  Lean sigma--will it work for healthcare? , 2005, Journal of healthcare information management : JHIM.

[26]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Research designs for studies evaluating the effectiveness of change and improvement strategies , 2003, Quality & safety in health care.

[27]  Martha R. Ortiz-Posadas,et al.  Sigma Level Performance of the Innovated Process in the Imaging Department at a Mexican Health Institute , 2012, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[28]  Jens Karstoft,et al.  Is Lean Management implementable in a department of radiology? , 2011, Insights into imaging.

[29]  P. Pronovost,et al.  How to use an article about quality improvement. , 2010, JAMA.

[30]  M. Gonyo,et al.  Practice policy and quality initiatives: using lean principles to improve screening mammography workflow. , 2013, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[31]  Ulf Aasebø,et al.  The Lean method as a clinical pathway facilitator in patients with lung cancer , 2012, The clinical respiratory journal.