Reducing and exaggerating escalation of commitment by option partitioning.

Options under escalation situations can be presented as a general class (e.g., investing in electronic products) or be partitioned into disjunctive suboptions within that class (e.g., investing in MP3 players, portable TV game consoles, and other electronic products). Drawing from the theoretical bases of partition priming and mental accounting, this research found support from 4 experiments that (a) a decision maker's commitment to a failing course of action is exaggerated when the escalation options are partitioned into multiple suboptions, whereas such commitment is reduced when the alternative options are portioned into suboptions, and (b) these partitioning effects are mediated by the subjective utility, including subjective values and probability, of the escalation option.

[1]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[2]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Knee-deep in the Big Muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. , 1976 .

[3]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Factors affecting withdrawal from an escalating conflict: Quitting before it's too late , 1979 .

[4]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[5]  B. M. Staw.  The Escalation of Commitment To a Course of Action , 1981 .

[6]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[7]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[8]  Mary Lloyd,et al.  Toward the Reduction of Entrapment , 1982 .

[9]  H. Arkes,et al.  The Psychology of Sunk Cost , 1985 .

[10]  Glen Whyte,et al.  Escalating Commitment to a Course of Action: A Reinterpretation , 1986 .

[11]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Escalation of Commitment to an Ineffective Course of Action: The Effect of Feedback Having Negative Implications for Self-Identity. , 1986 .

[13]  Edward J. Conlon,et al.  Information Requests in the Context of Escalation , 1986 .

[14]  Charles H. Schwenk.  Information, Cognitive Biases, and Commitment to a Course of Action , 1986 .

[15]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Behavior in escalation situations: Antecedents, prototypes, and solutions. , 1987 .

[16]  K. Eisenhardt.  Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[17]  I. Simonson.  The Effect of Purchase Quantity and Timing on Variety-Seeking Behavior , 1990 .

[18]  A. Tversky,et al.  Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model , 1991 .

[19]  Itamar Simonson,et al.  Deescalation Strategies: A Comparison of Techniques for Reducing Commitment to Losing Courses of Action , 1992 .

[20]  J. Brockner.  The Escalation of Commitment to a Failing Course of Action: Toward Theoretical Progress , 1992 .

[21]  Max H. Bazerman,et al.  Reversals of preference in allocation decisions: Judging an alternative versus choosing among alternatives , 1992 .

[22]  Donald E. Conlon,et al.  The Role of Project Completion Information in Resource Allocation Decisions , 1993 .

[23]  A. Tversky,et al.  Context-dependent preferences , 1993 .

[24]  David M. Messick,et al.  Equality as a decision heuristic. , 1993 .

[25]  A. Tversky,et al.  Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability. , 1994 .

[26]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Diversification bias: Explaining the discrepancy in variety seeking between combined and separated choices , 1995 .

[27]  Jeffrey R. Edwards,et al.  Alternatives to difference scores as dependent variables in the study of congruence in organizational research. , 1995 .

[28]  Daniel Read,et al.  The diversification bias: Explaining the difference between prospective and real-time taste for variety , 1995 .

[29]  Hun-Tong Tan,et al.  Sunk Cost Effects: The Influences of Instruction and Future Return Estimates , 1995 .

[30]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Organizational decision making: The escalation of commitment: An update and appraisal , 1996 .

[31]  F D Schoorman,et al.  Psychological antecedents of escalation behavior: effects of choice, responsibility, and decision consequences. , 1996, The Journal of applied psychology.

[32]  S. Epstein,et al.  Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  Scott Highhouse,et al.  Context-Dependent Selection: The Effects of Decoy and Phantom Job Candidates , 1996 .

[34]  Patricia J. Holahan,et al.  Psychological antecedents of escalation behavior: effects of choice, responsibility, and decision consequences. , 1996, The Journal of applied psychology.

[35]  A. Tversky,et al.  Unpacking, repacking, and anchoring: advances in support theory. , 1997 .

[36]  Schneider,et al.  All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[37]  Mark A. Davis,et al.  A study of escalating commitment in principal–agent relationships: Effects of monitoring and personal responsibility. , 1998 .

[38]  Seymour Epstein,et al.  The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. , 1999 .

[39]  Scott Highhouse,et al.  Decoy effects and attribute-level inferences. , 1999 .

[40]  S Epstein,et al.  The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  R. Thaler.  Mental accounting matters , 1999 .

[42]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Options: A Review and Theoretical Analysis , 1999 .

[43]  Hal R. Arkes,et al.  The role of probability of success estimates in the sunk cost effect , 2000 .

[44]  Scott Highhouse.  Judgment and Decision-Making Research: Relevance to Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2001 .

[45]  R. Thaler,et al.  Naive Diversification Strategies in Defined Contribution Saving Plans , 2001 .

[46]  Henry Moon,et al.  Looking forward and looking back: integrating completion and sunk-cost effects within an escalation-of-commitment progress decision. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[47]  Hun-Tong Tan,et al.  Financial Budgets and Escalation Effects , 2002 .

[48]  Craig R. Fox,et al.  Partition Priming in Judgment Under Uncertainty , 2003, Psychological science.

[49]  I. W. Zartman.  Looking forward and looking backward on negotiation theory , 2005 .

[50]  Kin Fai Ellick Wong.  The role of risk in making decisions under escalation situations , 2005 .

[51]  Kin Fai Ellick Wong,et al.  When thinking rationally increases biases: The role of rational thinking style in escalation of commitment , 2008 .

[52]  Rebecca K. Ratner,et al.  How subjective grouping of options influences choice and allocation: diversification bias and the phenomenon of partition dependence. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[53]  Kin Fai Ellick Wong,et al.  Between-individual comparisons in performance evaluation: a perspective from prospect theory. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[54]  Jessica Y.Y. Kwong,et al.  Comparing two tiny giants or two huge dwarfs? Preference reversals owing to number size framing , 2005 .

[55]  Kin Fai Ellick Wong,et al.  Understanding the emotional aspects of escalation of commitment: the role of negative affect. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[56]  Kin Fai Ellick Wong,et al.  The role of ratio differences in the framing of numerical information , 2006 .

[57]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[58]  Kin Fai Ellick Wong,et al.  The role of anticipated regret in escalation of commitment. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[59]  Richard H. Thaler,et al.  Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice , 1985, Mark. Sci..

[60]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[61]  Francis J. Flynn,et al.  9 The Case for Behavioral Decision Research in Organizational Behavior , 2008 .

[62]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  What If Industrial–Organizational Psychology Decided to Take Workplace Decisions Seriously? , 2010, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[63]  Kristine M. Kuhn.  Can Managers Be Trained to Make Better Decisions? , 2010, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[64]  Integrating IOOB and JDM Through Process-Oriented Research , 2010, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[65]  Marissa L. Shuffler,et al.  How Experts Make Decisions: Beyond the JDM Paradigm , 2010, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[66]  M. Zeelenberg,et al.  Who throws good money after bad? Action vs. state orientation moderates the sunk cost fallacy , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.

[67]  S. Bonaccio,et al.  Taking Workplace Decisions Seriously: This Conversation Has Been Fruitful! , 2010, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[68]  Kin Fai Ellick Wong,et al.  The Effect of Managerial Bias on Employees' Specific Human Capital Investments , 2012 .

[69]  Dustin J. Sleesman,et al.  CLEANING UP THE BIG MUDDY: A META-ANALYTIC REVIEW OF THE DETERMINANTS OF ESCALATION OF COMMITMENT , 2012 .