Multimodal field data entry:performance and usability issues

Mobile technologies have yet to be widely adopted by the Architectural, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) industry despite being one of the major growth areas in computing in recent years. This lack of uptake in the AEC industry is likely due, in large part, to the combination of small screen size and inappropriate interaction demands of current mobile technologies. This paper discusses the scope for multimodal interaction design with a specific focus on speech-based interaction to enhance the suitability of mobile technology use within the AEC industry by broadening the field data input capabilities of such technologies. To investigate the appropriateness of using multimodal technology for field data collection in the AEC industry, we have developed a prototype Multimodal Field Data Entry (MFDE) application. This application, which allows concrete testing technicians to record quality control data in the field, has been designed to support two different modalities of data input speech-based data entry and stylus-based data entry. To compare the effectiveness or usability of, and user preference for, the different input options, we have designed a comprehensive lab-based evaluation of the application. To appropriately reflect the anticipated context of use within the study design, careful consideration had to be given to the key elements of a construction site that would potentially influence a test technician's ability to use the input techniques. These considerations and the resultant evaluation design are discussed in detail in this paper.

[1]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  Making the Case for Mobile IT in Construction , 2005 .

[2]  Connor Graham,et al.  A Review of Mobile HCI Research Methods , 2003, Mobile HCI.

[3]  Sylvain Giroux,et al.  Mobile Lessons: Lessons Based on Geo-Referenced Information. , 2002 .

[4]  Irina Kondratova Voice and multimodal technology for the mobile worker , 2004, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[5]  Kamel S. Saidi,et al.  The Value of Handheld Computers in Construction , 2002 .

[6]  E N Allouche,et al.  Prediction and mitigation of construction noise in an urban environment , 2003 .

[7]  I. L. Kondratova Speech — Enabled Handheld Computing for Fieldwork , 2005 .

[8]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Workload Assessment and Prediction , 1990 .

[9]  Jan Stage,et al.  New techniques for usability evaluation of mobile systems , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[10]  Jesper Kjeldskov,et al.  Is It Worth the Hassle? Exploring the Added Value of Evaluating the Usability of Context-Aware Mobile Systems in the Field , 2004, Mobile HCI.

[11]  Binh Pham,et al.  Handheld devices for applications using dynamic multimedia data , 2004, GRAPHITE '04.

[12]  Martin Keller,et al.  Issues of context sensitivity in mobile computing: restrictions and challenges in the construction sector , 2004 .

[13]  Joanna Lumsden The future of M-interaction , 2005 .

[14]  Harold R. Booher,et al.  Manprint: An Approach to Systems Integration , 1990 .

[15]  Isto Huvila,et al.  Encyclopedia of Multimedia Technology and Networking , 2008 .

[16]  C. Burgy,et al.  Situation-Aware Interface Design: An Interaction Constraints Model for Finding the Right Interaction for Mobile and Wearable Computer Systems , 2002 .