The VLAB OER Experience: Modeling Potential-Adopter Student Acceptance

Virtual Labs (VLAB) is a multi-institutional Open Educational Resources (OER) initiative, exclusively focused on lab experiments for engineering education. This project envisages building a large OER repository, containing over 1650 virtual experiments mapped to the engineering curriculum. The introduction of VLAB is a paradigm shift in an educational system that is slow to change. Treating VLAB OER as an educational technology innovation, its adoption by potential-adopter engineering students (N=131) is modeled based on Roger's theory of perceived attributes. Regression and factor analysis were used to analyze the data. Results indicate that the attributes of Compatibility, Ease of Use, Relative Advantage, and Trialability significantly influence potential-adopter students' intention to adopt an innovation like VLAB. The study also observed that using OER (such as VLAB) on desktops and low-cost tablets had similar effects in student performance to using physical labs. This has interesting implications for education policy-makers who are looking to reduce the digital divide.

[1]  Barney Dalgarno,et al.  Effectiveness of a Virtual Laboratory as a preparatory resource for Distance Education chemistry students , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[2]  Rory McGreal,et al.  Open Education Resources (OER) for assessment and credit for students project: Towards a logic model and plan for action , 2011 .

[3]  Shyam Diwakar,et al.  Biotechnology Virtual Labs: Facilitating Laboratory Access Anytime-Anywhere for Classroom Education , 2012 .

[4]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Comparing the effects of representational tools in collaborative and individual inquiry learning , 2011, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[5]  Noah S. Podolefsky,et al.  When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment , 2005 .

[6]  Harold Abelson,et al.  MIT's Strategy for Educational Technology Innovation, 1999–2003 , 2008, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[7]  A. Ray Helsel,et al.  Teachers' Acceptance of Innovation and Innovation Characteristics. , 1972 .

[8]  Raghu Raman,et al.  The VALUE @ Amrita Virtual Labs Project: Using Web Technology to Provide Virtual Laboratory Access to Students , 2011, 2011 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference.

[9]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[10]  Ulf-Daniel Ehlers,et al.  Extending the Territory: From Open Educational Resources to Open Educational Practices. , 2011 .

[11]  P. Eckel,et al.  The Effect of Institutional Culture on Change Strategies in Higher Education , 2002 .

[12]  M. Linn,et al.  Investigations of a complex, realistic task: Intentional, unsystematic, and exhaustive experimenters , 2011 .

[13]  Maura Borrego,et al.  Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations: A Survey of Awareness and Adoption Rates in U.S. Engineering Departments , 2010 .

[14]  Raghu Raman,et al.  Integrating Collaboration and Accessibility for Deploying Virtual Labs using VLCAP , 2011 .

[15]  Z. C. Zacharia,et al.  Comparing and combining real and virtual experimentation: an effort to enhance students' conceptual understanding of electric circuits , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[16]  Brenda Gourley,et al.  Re‐invigorating openness at The Open University: the role of Open Educational Resources , 2009 .

[17]  Jens Josephsen,et al.  Simulation of laboratory assignments to support students’ learning of introductory inorganic chemistry , 2006 .

[18]  Constantinos P. Constantinou,et al.  Comparing the influence of physical and virtual manipulatives in the context of the Physics by Inquiry curriculum: The case of undergraduate students’ conceptual understanding of heat and temperature , 2008 .