Recruiting patients into a primary care based study of palliative care: why is it so difficult?

In the UK, researchers' access to study populations and control over selection of participants is becoming increasingly constrained by data protection and research governance legislation. Intervening stages placed between researchers and the population they wish to study can have serious effects on recruitment and ultimately on the validity of studies. In this paper we describe our experiences of gaining access to patients for a study of palliative care in primary care. Despite considerable time and resources dedicated to recruitment, a smaller than anticipated study sample was achieved. We found that gatekeeping by ethics committees and practitioner control over sample selection were significant hurdles in accessing patients for the study. Gatekeeping responsibilities represent considerable challenges for researchers seeking to obtain a representative study sample, not just in palliative care, but for research in general in health care.

[1]  P. Kline.  Handbook of Psychological Testing , 2013 .

[2]  M. Dixon-Woods,et al.  Participating in primary care research. , 2002, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[3]  S. Eckstein.  Governance arrangements for NHS research ethics committees , 2003 .

[4]  R. Sanson-Fisher,et al.  Reducing systematic bias in studies of general practitioners: the use of a medical peer in the recruitment of general practitioners in research. , 1995, Family practice.

[5]  A. Kinmonth,et al.  'Will you help me with my research?' Gaining access to primary care settings and subjects. , 1992, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[6]  A. Cook,et al.  Recruiting into palliative care trials: lessons learnt from a feasibility study , 2002, Palliative medicine.

[7]  B. Delaney,et al.  General practice Randomised controlled trials in primary care : case study , 2022 .

[8]  Simon Moulton,et al.  The data protection act , 1989 .

[9]  E. Kaner,et al.  General practice postal surveys: a questionnaire too far? , 1996, BMJ.

[10]  C. Woodward,et al.  Recruiting family physicians and patients for a clinical trial: lessons learned. , 2002, Family practice.

[11]  S. Barclay,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of a hospital at home service for the terminally ill , 2000, Palliative medicine.

[12]  S. Barclay,et al.  Developing the Cambridge palliative audit schedule (CAMPAS): a palliative care audit for primary health care teams. , 1998, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[13]  S. Kaasa,et al.  Challenges in palliative care research; recruitment, attrition and compliance: experience from a randomized controlled trial , 1999, Palliative medicine.

[14]  A. Deehan,et al.  The effect of cash and other financial inducements on the response rate of general practitioners in a national postal study. , 1997, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[15]  A. Donner,et al.  Evaluation of a palliative care service: problems and pitfalls , 1994, BMJ.

[16]  Michael Billig,et al.  Ideological Dilemmas: A Social Psychology of Everyday Thinking , 1988 .

[17]  William M. K. Trochim,et al.  Research methods knowledge base , 2001 .

[18]  G. Bettelli,et al.  Randomised clinical trials in general practice: lessons from a failure. , 1991, BMJ.

[19]  J. Williams,et al.  Recruiting family physicians as participants in research. , 1989, Family practice.

[20]  E. Freidson.  Claims Examined. (Book Reviews: Profession of Medicine. A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge) , 1970 .

[21]  A. Guerrero.  will you help me , 1981 .

[22]  A. Richardson,et al.  Eliciting views of patients with head and neck cancer and carers on professionally derived standards for care. , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[23]  I. Higginson.  4 Palliative and Terminal Care , 1997 .

[24]  S. Barclay,et al.  Validation of a symptom measure suitable for use among palliative care patients in the community: CAMPAS-R. , 2004, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[25]  J. Ward.  General practitioners' experience of research. , 1994, Family Practice.

[26]  Herbert Burkert,et al.  Some Preliminary Comments on the DIRECTIVE 95/46/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. , 1996 .

[27]  R. Foy,et al.  Clinical trials in primary care , 1998, BMJ.

[28]  Marc Taylor,et al.  Research governance framework for health and social care. , 2002, Health & social care in the community.

[29]  T. Walley,et al.  Data protection legislation: interpretation and barriers to research , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[30]  D. Saunders.  Why are trials in palliative care so difficult? , 2000, Palliative medicine.

[31]  M. Whitehouse,et al.  A policy framework for commissioning cancer services , 1995, BMJ.

[32]  S. Barclay,et al.  Does hospital at home for palliative care facilitate death at home? Randomised controlled trial , 1999, BMJ.

[33]  A Bond,et al.  Factors affecting general practitioners' recruitment of patients into a prospective study. , 1993, Family practice.

[34]  F. Cheater,et al.  The Data Protection Act (1998): implications for health researchers. , 2001, Journal of advanced nursing.

[35]  D. Lawlor,et al.  Public health and data protection: an inevitable collision or potential for a meeting of minds? , 2001, International journal of epidemiology.