Improved Prediction and Mapping of Soil Copper by Kriging with Auxiliary Data for Cation-Exchange Capacity

Measurements of Cu or other trace elements in soils are rarely available in sufficient abundance to permit accurate mapping of large areas. In contrast, information is more widely available for major soil characteristics, such as cation-exchange capacity (CEC). Using data for soils of northern North Dakota, we compared four geostatistical methods as predictors of soil Cu: ordinary kriging (OK), ordinary kriging combined with regression (OKR), ordinary cokriging (OCK), and standardized ordinary cokriging (SCK). Ordinary kriging utilized data for soil Cu only, whereas the other three methods made use of CEC, which served as a secondary variable to improve the prediction and mapping of soil Cu. Quantitative predictions of soil Cu were tested by partitioning 619 sites of Cu into a training set of 310 sites, which was used to build models, and a testing set of 309 sites, which was reserved to test predictions derived from the training set. All three of the methods utilizing CEC data improved predictions substantially in comparison to OK. A larger data set containing data for soil Cu, CEC, or both was compiled from several comparable sources to prepare maps of Cu in soils of the 18 counties of northern North Dakota. These maps, based on data for 1002 sites within northern North Dakota, were quite similar for the three kriging methods which used data for both Cu and CEC, but different from the map derived from OK. Thus, the differences among the maps for soil Cu were consistent with our conclusion that the prediction of soil Cu was substantially improved by the use of CEC as an auxiliary variable.

[1]  A. Warrick,et al.  Estimating Soil Water Content Using Cokriging1 , 1987 .

[2]  R. Webster,et al.  Geostatistical analysis of soil contamination in the Swiss Jura. , 1994, Environmental pollution.

[3]  Donald E. Myers,et al.  Estimation of the Spatial Distribution of Soil Chemicals Using Pseudo-Cross-Variograms , 1992 .

[4]  D. R. Nielsen,et al.  The Use of Cokriging with Limited Field Soil Observations 1 , 1983 .

[5]  P. Goovaerts Ordinary Cokriging Revisited , 1998 .

[6]  D. Brus,et al.  A comparison of kriging, co-kriging and kriging combined with regression for spatial interpolation of horizon depth with censored observations , 1995 .

[7]  Ross M. Welch Micronutrient Nutrition of Plants , 1995 .

[8]  D. Corwin,et al.  Water Content Effect on Soil Salinity Prediction: A Geostatistical Study Using Cokriging , 1995 .

[9]  K. Juang,et al.  A Comparison of Three Kriging Methods Using Auxiliary Variables in Heavy-Metal Contaminated Soils , 1998 .

[10]  Timothy C. Coburn,et al.  Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation , 2000, Technometrics.

[11]  Rufus L. Chaney,et al.  Cadmium, Lead, Zinc, Copper, and Nickel in Agricultural Soils of the United States of America , 1993 .

[12]  D. Mulla Estimating Spatial Patterns in Water Content, Matric Suction, and Hydraulic Conductivity , 1988 .

[13]  H. T. Shacklette,et al.  Element concentrations in soils and other surficial materials of the conterminous United States , 1984 .

[14]  J. Mortvedt Micronutrients in agriculture , 1991 .

[15]  Ross M. Welch,et al.  Spatial Variability of Grain Cadmium and Soil Characteristics in a Durum Wheat Field , 2002 .

[16]  G. Marsily,et al.  Comparison of geostatistical methods for estimating transmissivity using data on transmissivity and specific capacity , 1987 .