Multi-factor decision-making strategy for better coronary plaque burden increase prediction: a patient-specific 3D FSI study using IVUS follow-up data

Plaque progression and vulnerability are influenced by many risk factors. Our goal is to find a simple method to combine multiple risk factors for better plaque development prediction. Intravascular ultrasound data at baseline and follow-up were acquired from nine patients, and fluid–structure interaction models were constructed to obtain plaque wall stress/strain (PWS/PWSn) and wall shear stress (WSS). Two hundred fifty-four slices with noticeable change in plaque burden were selected for analyses. Data of six key morphological and biomechanical factors were extracted from each slice at baseline to predict plaque development measured by plaque burden increase (PBI) from baseline to follow-up. A multi-factor decision-making strategy was proposed to assign a binary predictive outcome YW (W represents any combination of these six factors) based on simple “threshold value” idea to predict the ground truth YPBI: YPBI = 1 if PBI > 0; YPBI = 0 otherwise. A fivefold cross-validation procedure was employed to identify the optimal predictor among all possible combinations. The results showed that PWS was the best single-factor predictor for PBI with a prediction accuracy of 63.0%. Among all 63 combinations, combining lipid percent, PWS and WSS gave the optimal predictor, achieving a prediction accuracy of 68.1%. This demonstrated that compared to single factor alone, integrating morphological and biomechanical factors would lead to higher prediction accuracy. The simple method could be extended to combine factors from different sources to improve prediction accuracy. Efforts in mechanical analysis and modeling automation are needed to bring this strategy closer to potential clinical applications.

[1]  R. Detrano,et al.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  Dalin Tang,et al.  Planar biaxial characterization of diseased human coronary and carotid arteries for computational modeling. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  R. Ogden,et al.  A New Constitutive Framework for Arterial Wall Mechanics and a Comparative Study of Material Models , 2000 .

[4]  Dalin Tang,et al.  Fluid-structure interaction models based on patient-specific IVUS at baseline and follow-up for prediction of coronary plaque progression by morphological and biomechanical factors: A preliminary study. , 2018, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  R D Kamm,et al.  Effects of fibrous cap thickness on peak circumferential stress in model atherosclerotic vessels. , 1992, Circulation research.

[6]  C. Zarins,et al.  Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Juan F Granada,et al.  Unreliable Assessment of Necrotic Core by Virtual Histology Intravascular Ultrasound in Porcine Coronary Artery Disease , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[8]  J. David Spence,et al.  Carotid Plaque Area: A Tool for Targeting and Evaluating Vascular Preventive Therapy , 2002, Stroke.

[9]  Dalin Tang,et al.  Morphological and Stress Vulnerability Indices for Human Coronary Plaques and Their Correlations with Cap Thickness and Lipid Percent: An IVUS-Based Fluid-Structure Interaction Multi-patient Study , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[10]  R. D. Groot,et al.  The electronic structure and magnetism of the Al/Fe interfaces , 2000 .

[11]  Jorge Tiago,et al.  Numerical simulations of a 3D fluid-structure interaction model for blood flow in an atherosclerotic artery. , 2016, Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE.

[12]  R. Kamm,et al.  Distribution of Circumferential Stress in Ruptured and Stable Atherosclerotic Lesions A Structural Analysis With Histopathological Correlation , 1993, Circulation.

[13]  D. Ku,et al.  Pulsatile Flow and Atherosclerosis in the Human Carotid Bifurcation: Positive Correlation between Plaque Location and Low and Oscillating Shear Stress , 1985, Arteriosclerosis.

[14]  Y. Fung,et al.  Strain distribution in small blood vessels with zero-stress state taken into consideration. , 1992, The American journal of physiology.

[15]  Dalin Tang,et al.  In Vivo IVUS-Based 3-D Fluid–Structure Interaction Models With Cyclic Bending and Anisotropic Vessel Properties for Human Atherosclerotic Coronary Plaque Mechanical Analysis , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  R. Virmani,et al.  Lessons from sudden coronary death: a comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. , 2000, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[17]  Michael C. McDaniel,et al.  Coronary Artery Wall Shear Stress Is Associated With Progression and Transformation of Atherosclerotic Plaque and Arterial Remodeling in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease , 2011, Circulation.

[18]  Dalin Tang,et al.  Image-based modeling for better understanding and assessment of atherosclerotic plaque progression and vulnerability: data, modeling, validation, uncertainty and predictions. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  Gary S Mintz,et al.  Intravascular imaging of coronary calcification and its clinical implications. , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[20]  W D Wagner,et al.  A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. , 1995, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[21]  K. Bathe Finite Element Procedures , 1995 .

[22]  S Glagov,et al.  The role of fluid mechanics in the localization and detection of atherosclerosis. , 1993, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[23]  Gary S. Mintz,et al.  Clinical utility of intravascular imaging and physiology in coronary artery disease. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  Jacques Ohayon,et al.  Necrotic core thickness and positive arterial remodeling index: emergent biomechanical factors for evaluating the risk of plaque rupture. , 2008, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[25]  S. Einav,et al.  Influence of microcalcifications on vulnerable plaque mechanics using FSI modeling. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  Sheldon Weinbaum,et al.  Revised microcalcification hypothesis for fibrous cap rupture in human coronary arteries , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Nan Zhang,et al.  Prediction of coronary plaque progression using biomechanical factors and vascular characteristics based on computed tomography angiography , 2017, Computer assisted surgery.

[28]  Xiaoya Guo,et al.  Combining IVUS and Optical Coherence Tomography for More Accurate Coronary Cap Thickness Quantification and Stress/Strain Calculations: A Patient-Specific Three-Dimensional Fluid-Structure Interaction Modeling Approach. , 2018, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[29]  Aldons J. Lusis,et al.  Atherosclerosis : Vascular biology , 2000 .

[30]  D G Vince,et al.  Arterial remodeling and coronary artery disease: the concept of "dilated" versus "obstructive" coronary atherosclerosis. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[31]  Gregg W Stone,et al.  Letter by Stone and Mintz regarding article, "unreliable assessment of necrotic core by virtual histology intravascular ultrasound in porcine coronary artery disease". , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[32]  Michail I. Papafaklis,et al.  Prediction of Progression of Coronary Artery Disease and Clinical Outcomes Using Vascular Profiling of Endothelial Shear Stress and Arterial Plaque Characteristics: The PREDICTION Study , 2012, Circulation.

[33]  Jonathan H. Gillard,et al.  Material properties of components in human carotid atherosclerotic plaques: A uniaxial extension study , 2014, Acta biomaterialia.

[34]  G Pasterkamp,et al.  Arterial Remodeling: Mechanisms and Clinical Implications , 2000 .

[35]  Renu Virmani,et al.  Histopathology of Carotid Atherosclerotic Disease , 2006, Neurosurgery.

[36]  G. V. R. Born,et al.  INFLUENCE OF PLAQUE CONFIGURATION AND STRESS DISTRIBUTION ON FISSURING OF CORONARY ATHEROSCLEROTIC PLAQUES , 1989, The Lancet.

[37]  Martin J. Graves,et al.  Arterial Luminal Curvature and Fibrous-Cap Thickness Affect Critical Stress Conditions Within Atherosclerotic Plaque: An In Vivo MRI-Based 2D Finite-Element Study , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[38]  Dalin Tang,et al.  In Vivo/Ex Vivo MRI-Based 3D Non-Newtonian FSI Models for Human Atherosclerotic Plaques Compared with Fluid/Wall-Only Models. , 2007, Computer modeling in engineering & sciences : CMES.

[39]  Jacques Ohayon,et al.  Influence of residual stress/strain on the biomechanical stability of vulnerable coronary plaques: potential impact for evaluating the risk of plaque rupture. , 2007, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[40]  V. Fuster,et al.  Coronary plaque disruption. , 1995, Circulation.

[41]  Xiaoya Guo,et al.  Quantify patient-specific coronary material property and its impact on stress/strain calculations using in vivo IVUS data and 3D FSI models: a pilot study , 2017, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[42]  Harm A Nieuwstadt,et al.  Carotid Plaque Morphological Classification Compared With Biomechanical Cap Stress: Implications for a Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Based Assessment , 2015, Stroke.

[43]  Dalin Tang,et al.  Local critical stress correlates better than global maximum stress with plaque morphological features linked to atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability: an in vivo multi-patient study , 2009, Biomedical engineering online.

[44]  Akiko Maehara,et al.  A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.