Susceptibility quantification in MRI using modified conjugate gradient least square method

MR susceptometry provides a new approach to enhance contrast in MR imaging and quantify substances such as iron, calcium, blood oxygenation in various organs for the clinical diagnosis of many diseases. Susceptibility is closely related to the magnetic field inhomogeneity in MRI, and calculation of susceptibility from the measured magnetic field is an ill-posed inverse problem. Conjugate gradient least square (CGLS) method with Tikhonov regularization is a powerful tool to solve the inverse problems. However, the estimated quantity in CGLS method is usually in one-dimensional (e.g., a column vector) while the most of MR data are in the form of three dimensions. In this work, the least square problem is modified to enable the calculation of susceptibility directly from three-dimensional MR phase maps, which has the benefit of reducing the size of associated matrices and usage of computer memories. Numerical simulations were used to find the proper regularization parameters and study the influence of different noise levels of the magnetic field on the regularization parameters. Experiments of superparamagnetic iron oxide phantom were also conducted. Both of the results demonstrate the validation and accuracy of this method.

[1]  Yi Wang,et al.  Quantitative susceptibility map reconstruction from MR phase data using bayesian regularization: Validation and application to brain imaging , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  C. Moonen,et al.  A fast calculation method for magnetic field inhomogeneity due to an arbitrary distribution of bulk susceptibility , 2003 .

[3]  E Mark Haacke,et al.  Reliability in detection of hemorrhage in acute stroke by a new three‐dimensional gradient recalled echo susceptibility‐weighted imaging technique compared to computed tomography: A retrospective study , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  Jaladhar Neelavalli,et al.  Clinical applications of neuroimaging with susceptibility‐weighted imaging , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  D. A. Dunnett Classical Electrodynamics , 2020, Nature.

[6]  Jaladhar Neelavalli,et al.  Removing background phase variations in susceptibility‐weighted imaging using a fast, forward‐field calculation , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  R. Bowtell,et al.  Application of a Fourier‐based method for rapid calculation of field inhomogeneity due to spatial variation of magnetic susceptibility , 2005 .

[8]  Z. Wu,et al.  Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging: Technical Aspects and Clinical Applications, Part 2 , 2008, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[9]  M A Moerland,et al.  Numerical analysis of the magnetic field for arbitrary magnetic susceptibility distributions in 2D. , 1992, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[10]  Zhiyue J. Wang,et al.  Magnetic susceptibility quantitation with MRI by solving boundary value problems. , 2003, Medical physics.

[11]  Yi Wang,et al.  Calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling (COSMOS): A method for conditioning the inverse problem from measured magnetic field map to susceptibility source image in MRI , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  E. Haacke,et al.  Imaging iron stores in the brain using magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[13]  J C Haselgrove,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging measurement of volume magnetic susceptibility using a boundary condition. , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[14]  J. Duyn,et al.  Magnetic susceptibility mapping of brain tissue in vivo using MRI phase data , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Lin Li,et al.  Magnetic susceptibility quantification for arbitrarily shaped objects in inhomogeneous fields , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  Raja Muthupillai,et al.  MRI measurement of hepatic magnetic susceptibility—Phantom validation and normal subject studies , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  Jaladhar Neelavalli,et al.  Susceptibility‐weighted imaging to visualize blood products and improve tumor contrast in the study of brain masses , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  Ernest Beutler,et al.  Iron deficiency and overload. , 2003, Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program.

[19]  Clifford H. Thurber,et al.  Parameter estimation and inverse problems , 2005 .

[20]  M. Hestenes,et al.  Methods of conjugate gradients for solving linear systems , 1952 .

[21]  Yi Wang,et al.  Quantitative MR susceptibility mapping using piece‐wise constant regularized inversion of the magnetic field , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  Karen M Rodrigue,et al.  Brain Aging and Its Modifiers , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[23]  P J Diaz,et al.  MR susceptometry: an external‐phantom method for measuring bulk susceptibility from field‐echo phase reconstruction maps , 1994, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[24]  M A Moerland,et al.  Numerical analysis of the magnetic field for arbitrary magnetic susceptibility distributions in 3D. , 1994, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[25]  J R Reichenbach,et al.  Small vessels in the human brain: MR venography with deoxyhemoglobin as an intrinsic contrast agent. , 1997, Radiology.

[26]  Qun Zhao,et al.  A model-based 3D phase unwrapping algorithm using Gegenbauer polynomials , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  P. Jacobs,et al.  Physical and chemical properties of superparamagnetic iron oxide MR contrast agents: ferumoxides, ferumoxtran, ferumoxsil. , 1995, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[28]  E. Haacke,et al.  Susceptibility-Weighted MR Imaging: A Review of Clinical Applications in Children , 2008, American Journal of Neuroradiology.