Adhesive properties of the arolium of a lantern-fly, Lycorma delicatula (Auchenorrhyncha, Fulgoridae).

The arolium in Lycorma delicatula is shaped as a truncated pyramid, tapering proximally. The base or the terminal area is corrugated, forming parasagittal wrinkles (period 1.5-5.0 microm), which are supported from inside by cuticular dendrites. Side faces of the arolium are made up of sclerotized dorsolateral plates. When claws slip on a smooth substrate and pronate, the dorsolateral plates diverge and expand the sticky terminal area. The real contact area with the glass plate was recognized by light reflection on its periphery. This area was measured and shown to be smaller when the leg was pressed perpendicularly to the substrate (0.02 mm(2)) than when it was sheared in a direction parallel to the substrate (0.05 mm(2)). Attachment forces were measured with the aid of dynamometric platforms during pulling of active insects from horizontal or vertical glass surfaces. Normal adhesive force (about 9-12 mN) was much less than friction force during sliding with velocity of 6-17 mm/s (50-100 mN); however, when expressed in tenacity per unit contact area the difference was less pronounced: 170 and 375-625 mN/mm(2), respectively. Sliding of the arolium during shear displacement was shown to be oscillatory in frame-by-frame video analysis. Relaxative oscillations consisted of periodical sticks-slips of the arolium along the glass surface.

[1]  R E Ritzmann,et al.  Effects of aging on behavior and leg kinematics during locomotion in two species of cockroach , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[2]  L. Frantsevich,et al.  Structure and mechanics of the tarsal chain in the hornet, Vespa crabro (Hymenoptera: Vespidae): implications on the attachment mechanism. , 2004, Arthropod structure & development.

[3]  Stanislav Gorb,et al.  Adhesion forces measured at the level of a terminal plate of the fly's seta , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  A Revised Interpretation of the Evolution of Attachment Structures in Hexapoda with Special Emphasis on Mantophasmatodea , 2006 .

[5]  Jim Hardie,et al.  THE ORGANS OF ADHESION IN THE APHID MEGOURA VICIAE , 1988 .

[6]  G. Roder Zur Morphologie des Praetarsus der Diptera und Mecoptera , 1986 .

[7]  Shoziro Ishii,et al.  Adhesion of a Leaf Feeding Ladybird Epilachna vigintioctomaculta (Coleoptera : Coccinellidae) on a Virtically Smooth Surface , 1987 .

[8]  Stanislav Gorb,et al.  Biological microtribology: anisotropy in frictional forces of orthopteran attachment pads reflects the ultrastructure of a highly deformable material , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  Elena Gorb,et al.  Structure and properties of the glandular surface in the digestive zone of the pitcher in the carnivorous plant Nepenthes ventrata and its role in insect trapping and retention , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[10]  W. Barnes,et al.  Adhesion and Detachment of the Toe Pads of Tree Frogs , 1991 .

[11]  Journal of Insect Physiology , 1957, Nature.

[12]  S. Gorb,et al.  Scale effects on the attachment pads and friction forces in syrphid flies (Diptera, Syrphidae). , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[13]  V. B. Wigglesworth How does a Fly Cling to The Under Surface of a Glass Sheet , 1987 .

[14]  Roger D. Quinn,et al.  A Robot that Climbs Walls using Micro-structured Polymer Feet , 2005, CLAWAR.

[15]  B. Hölldobler,et al.  Attachment forces of ants measured with a centrifuge: better 'wax-runners' have a poorer attachment to a smooth surface. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[16]  T. Endlein,et al.  Locomotion and adhesion: dynamic control of adhesive surface contact in ants. , 2004, Arthropod structure & development.

[17]  Scanning electron microscopy of the honeybee, Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) pretarsus , 1989 .

[18]  L. Roth,et al.  Tarsal structure and climbing ability of cockroaches , 1952 .

[19]  Stanislav N Gorb,et al.  Ontogenesis of the attachment ability in the bug Coreus marginatus (Heteroptera, Insecta) , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[20]  K. Kobe The friction and lubrication of solids , 1951 .

[21]  S. Zill,et al.  Elasticity and movements of the cockroach tarsus in walking , 1999, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[22]  B. Heming Functional morphology of the pretarsus in larval Thysanoptera , 1972 .

[23]  R. Full,et al.  Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair , 2000, Nature.

[24]  U. Schwarz,et al.  Chemical composition of the attachment pad secretion of the locust Locusta migratoria. , 2002, Insect biochemistry and molecular biology.

[25]  S. Gorb,et al.  Composite structure of the crystalline epicuticular wax layer of the slippery zone in the pitchers of the carnivorous plant Nepenthes alata and its effect on insect attachment , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[26]  S. Gorb,et al.  Shearing of fibrillar adhesive microstructure: friction and shear-related changes in pull-off force , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[27]  S. Gorb,et al.  From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment devices , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  B S Heming,et al.  Functional morphology of the thysanopteran pretarsus. , 1971, Canadian journal of zoology.

[29]  T. Eisner,et al.  Defense by foot adhesion in a beetle (Hemisphaerota cyanea). , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  A. Liang Seven new species of Kinnara Distant (Hemiptera: Fulgoroidea: Kinnaridae), with notes on antennal sensilla and wax glands , 2002 .

[31]  L. Frantsevich,et al.  Arcus as a tensegrity structure in the arolium of wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). , 2002, Zoology.

[32]  S. Gorb,et al.  WHEN LESS IS MORE: EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FOR TENACITY ENHANCEMENT BY DIVISION OF CONTACT AREA , 2004 .

[33]  Thomas A. McMahon,et al.  Biomechanics of the movable pretarsal adhesive organ in ants and bees , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  Nigel E. Stork,et al.  Experimental Analysis of Adhesion of Chrysolina Polita (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera) on a Variety of Surfaces , 1980 .

[35]  Oliver Betz,et al.  Structure of the tarsi in some stenus species (coleoptera, staphylinidae): External morphology, ultrastructure, and tarsal secretion , 2003, Journal of morphology.

[36]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  Biological Micro- and Nanotribology: Nature’s Solutions , 2010 .

[37]  Eleanor H. Slifer,et al.  Vulnerable Areas on the Surface of the Tarsus and Pretarsus of the Grasshopper (Acrididae, Orthoptera); with Special Reference to the Arolium , 1950 .

[38]  Huajian Gao,et al.  Mechanics of hierarchical adhesion structures of geckos , 2005 .

[39]  W. Godwin Article in Press , 2000 .

[40]  A. F. G. Dixon,et al.  The Mechanism by Which Aphids Adhere to Smooth Surfaces , 1990 .

[41]  G. Walker,et al.  The adhesive organ of the blowfly, Calliphora vomitoria: a functional approach (Diptera: Calliphoridae) , 1985 .

[42]  G. H. C.,et al.  The Anatomy of the Honey Bee , 1910, Nature.

[43]  Oliver Betz,et al.  Performance and adaptive value of tarsal morphology in rove beetles of the genus Stenus (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae). , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[44]  L. Mahadevan,et al.  Peeling from a biomimetically patterned thin elastic film , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[45]  R. Full,et al.  An Integrative Study of Insect Adhesion: Mechanics and Wet Adhesion of Pretarsal Pads in Ants1 , 2002, Integrative and comparative biology.

[46]  Y. Jiao,et al.  Adhesion measured on the attachment pads of Tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera, insecta). , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[47]  K. Kendall Thin-film peeling-the elastic term , 1975 .

[48]  S. Gorb,et al.  Tarsal movements in flies during leg attachment and detachment on a smooth substrate. , 2003, Journal of insect physiology.

[49]  M. Scherge,et al.  Biological micro- and nanotribology , 2001 .

[50]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  The design of the fly adhesive pad: distal tenent setae are adapted to the delivery of an adhesive secretion , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  S. Gorb,et al.  Ultrastructural architecture and mechanical properties of attachment pads in Tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera Tettigoniidae) , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[52]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  Ultrastructure of attachment specializations of hexapods (Arthropoda): evolutionary patterns inferred from a revised ordinal phylogeny , 2001 .

[53]  Marion D. Kendall,et al.  The Anatomy of the Tarsi of Schistocerca gregaria Forskål , 2004, Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie.

[54]  Heinz Schwarz,et al.  Material structure, stiffness, and adhesion: why attachment pads of the grasshopper (Tettigonia viridissima) adhere more strongly than those of the locust (Locusta migratoria) (Insecta: Orthoptera) , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.